【摘要】：本文中,對英國區(qū)際判決承認與執(zhí)行制度從三個部分來闡述,并在最后討論該制度對于中國的借鑒意義。 第一部分是對英國區(qū)際判決承認和執(zhí)行制度的涵義進行介紹。首先,說明區(qū)際判決是一種法律現(xiàn)象,指的是在一個主權(quán)國家內(nèi)由于存在不同法域?qū)е禄ハ嘀g不能對彼此判決直接承認或執(zhí)行。接下來介紹承認與執(zhí)行的涵義、判決執(zhí)行需滿足的條件以及承認和執(zhí)行之間的區(qū)別和聯(lián)系。其次,介紹該制度的生成背景,也即英國三個法域是如何形成的。最后闡述該制度與英國對外國判決的承認與執(zhí)行制度之間的關系。 第二部分主要是對英國區(qū)際判決承認與執(zhí)行制度的法律淵源的介紹。由于英國是傳統(tǒng)的普通法系國家,因此普通法是該制度的法律淵源之一。在英國加入相關國際公約以前,普通法是對外國判決承認與執(zhí)行的重要法律淵源；同時英國是歐洲聯(lián)盟的成員,因此英國加入了很多由歐盟國家共同簽署的國際公約,如本文中介紹的《1968年盧迦諾公約》。由于國際公約在英國不能直接得以適用,因此英國制定了全國統(tǒng)一的成文法,以規(guī)范區(qū)際判決的承認與執(zhí)行制度,例如《1982年民事管轄和判決法令》。 第三部分中將介紹英國區(qū)際判決承認與執(zhí)行制度的具體規(guī)則。由于現(xiàn)行的該制度主要依據(jù)的是1982年制定的《民事管轄和判決法令》中的第18條款以及附表6和附表7中的規(guī)定,因此在這一部分首先將依據(jù)該法令相關規(guī)定首先對這一制度進行總體介紹,然后再分別對金錢判決和非金錢判決兩種類型的判決進行闡述,并對其分別介紹具體的承認與執(zhí)行方式。 最后,是討論英國區(qū)際判決承認與執(zhí)行制度對于中國的借鑒意義。隨著香港、澳門特別行政區(qū)的回歸,中國已經(jīng)成為了一個典型的復合法域國家。本部分首先分別從香港、澳門以及臺灣三個方面闡述中國區(qū)際判決承認與執(zhí)行制度的現(xiàn)狀,并分析該制度在三個法域中實施方式的異同。其次,分析當前中國區(qū)際判決承認與執(zhí)行制度的不足,并討論在英國區(qū)際判決承認與執(zhí)行制度中可供中國借鑒之處。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the system of recognition and enforcement of interregional judgments in Britain is described in three parts, and the significance of the system for China is discussed in the end. The first part introduces the meaning of the system of recognition and enforcement of interregional judgments in Britain. First of all, it shows that inter-regional judgment is a kind of legal phenomenon, which means that in a sovereign state, due to the existence of different jurisdictions, it is impossible for each other to directly recognize or enforce each other's judgments. Then it introduces the meaning of recognition and enforcement, the conditions to be satisfied and the distinction and relation between recognition and enforcement. Secondly, it introduces the background of the formation of the system, that is, how the three jurisdictions of the United Kingdom formed. Finally, the relationship between the system and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Britain is discussed. The second part mainly introduces the legal sources of the system of recognition and enforcement of interregional judgments in Britain. As Britain is a traditional common law country, common law is one of the legal sources of this system. Before Britain joined the relevant international conventions, the common law was an important source of law for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. At the same time, the United Kingdom was a member of the European Union, so Britain acceded to many international conventions signed jointly by the EU countries. As described in this article, the 1968 Lugano Convention. Because international conventions can not be directly applied in Britain, Britain has formulated a unified statute law to regulate the system of recognition and enforcement of inter-regional judgments, such as the Civil jurisdiction and judgment Act 1982. The third part will introduce the specific rules of the system of recognition and enforcement of interregional judgments in Britain. Since the current system is based primarily on article 18 of the Civil jurisdiction and judgments Act, enacted in 1982, and the provisions of schedules 6 and 7, Therefore, in this part, we will first introduce the system as a whole according to the relevant provisions of the Act, and then elaborate on the two types of judgments: monetary judgment and non-pecuniary judgment, respectively. And introduces the specific recognition and enforcement respectively. Finally, the paper discusses the significance of the system of recognition and enforcement of interregional judgments to China. With the return of Hong Kong and Macao, China has become a typical complex jurisdiction. This part first expounds the status quo of China's inter-regional judgment recognition and enforcement system from the three aspects of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, and analyzes the similarities and differences of the implementation of the system in the three jurisdictions. Secondly, it analyzes the deficiencies of the current system of recognition and enforcement of inter-regional judgments in China, and discusses the points that can be used for reference by China in the system of recognition and enforcement of inter-regional judgments in the United Kingdom.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D956.1;D997

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前9條

1 張淑鈿;;英國區(qū)際民事管轄權(quán)沖突的協(xié)調(diào)模式及對我國的啟示[J];北方法學;2009年04期

2 陳力;內(nèi)地與香港民商事判決的相互承認與執(zhí)行:現(xiàn)狀與前瞻[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2000年05期

3 郭玉軍,向在勝;歐盟《民商事管轄權(quán)及判決承認與執(zhí)行條例》介評[J];法學評論;2002年02期

4 黃進;論當代法律的若干發(fā)展趨勢[J];法學評論;1997年04期

5 黃潔;;中國多邊區(qū)際民商事判決承認和執(zhí)行安排——對解決四大難題的建議[J];國際商務研究;2010年06期

6 朱志晟;;論英國的區(qū)際判決承認與執(zhí)行制度[J];河北法學;2011年02期

7 鄧杰;論國際民事訴訟中的協(xié)議管轄制度[J];武漢大學學報(社會科學版);2002年06期

8 李昌盛,徐玉春;英國普通法"程序先于權(quán)利"原則及其借鑒價值[J];皖西學院學報;2004年02期

9 董麗萍;中澳承認與執(zhí)行外國判決的條件[J];中國人民大學學報;1996年02期

，

本文編號：2217095