【摘要】：平行訴訟是國(guó)際民事訴訟中經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題,其產(chǎn)生與各國(guó)管轄權(quán)的積極沖突、當(dāng)事人挑選法院等因素有密切聯(lián)系。平行訴訟的存在雖然有其積極意義,但更多表現(xiàn)出對(duì)當(dāng)事人合法權(quán)益、對(duì)國(guó)際間民商事案件管轄的協(xié)調(diào)等方面的不利影響。從各國(guó)立法和實(shí)踐來(lái)看,大多數(shù)國(guó)家采取了規(guī)范和減少平行訴訟情形的做法。而我國(guó)目前基本采取的是不區(qū)分具體情況而一律放任的態(tài)度,鑒于我國(guó)參與國(guó)際交往的深入發(fā)展,帶有特定歷史痕跡的態(tài)度應(yīng)當(dāng)有所改變。本文在理清概念和研究對(duì)象的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)際上不同國(guó)家的立法和國(guó)際條約中解決平行訴訟問(wèn)題做法的總結(jié)和分析,結(jié)合我國(guó)既有的立法和實(shí)際情況,提出完善我國(guó)平行訴訟問(wèn)題應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制的建議。 具體來(lái)說(shuō),本文共分為四章: 第一章是平行訴訟的發(fā)生。該章從國(guó)際私法上的平行訴訟的概念出發(fā),分析認(rèn)定平行訴訟的三項(xiàng)構(gòu)成要件,指出國(guó)際私法上的平行訴訟分為國(guó)際平行訴訟和區(qū)際平行訴訟,從而準(zhǔn)確地對(duì)研究對(duì)象和領(lǐng)域作出界定。在此基礎(chǔ)上,繼續(xù)總結(jié)和分析了平行訴訟的多發(fā)領(lǐng)域。 第二章是平行訴訟的成因和影響。該章分析了國(guó)際私法上平行訴訟產(chǎn)生的內(nèi)在動(dòng)因包括各國(guó)管轄權(quán)的擴(kuò)展、當(dāng)事人自身追求和國(guó)際法規(guī)范上的“放縱”。同時(shí),還闡明了平行訴訟可能帶來(lái)的消極影響,包括對(duì)司法資源的浪費(fèi)、各國(guó)管轄權(quán)沖突加劇、當(dāng)事人利益受損和對(duì)國(guó)際交往深入發(fā)展造成阻礙。 第三章是對(duì)既有解決國(guó)際私法上平行訴訟問(wèn)題的方法的歸納和評(píng)析。該章將既有方法分為國(guó)內(nèi)法方法和國(guó)際法方法。前者包括“一事不再理規(guī)則”、“不方便法院規(guī)則”、“承認(rèn)預(yù)期規(guī)則”等;后者包括《布魯塞爾公約》、《海牙公約》以及近年來(lái)國(guó)際私法會(huì)議所作的努力。本章具體分析了這些方法和國(guó)際條約中的先進(jìn)之處和存在的問(wèn)題,以期借鑒。 第四章是我國(guó)涉外民商事訴訟問(wèn)題。本章主要致力于解決我國(guó)的問(wèn)題,首先總結(jié)了我國(guó)有關(guān)平行訴訟的既有立法、參加的雙邊或多邊條約以及相應(yīng)的實(shí)踐操作,然后從正反兩個(gè)方面客觀分析我國(guó)既有規(guī)范的合理性和不合理性,在這些努力的基礎(chǔ)上,本章最后提出完善我國(guó)平行訴訟應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制的總體思路和可采用的具體措施,并對(duì)我國(guó)處理內(nèi)地與港澳臺(tái)地區(qū)之間的區(qū)際平行訴訟問(wèn)題作了特別的補(bǔ)充。
[Abstract]:Parallel action is a common problem in international civil action, which is closely related to the active conflict of jurisdiction of various countries and the selection of court by the parties. Although the existence of parallel litigation has its positive significance, it has more adverse effects on the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and on the coordination of international jurisdiction in civil and commercial cases. From the national legislation and practice, most countries have adopted the practice of regulating and reducing parallel proceedings. In view of the deep development of China's participation in international exchanges, the attitude with specific historical traces should be changed. On the basis of clarifying the concept and research object, this paper summarizes and analyzes the practice of solving the problem of parallel litigation in the legislation and international treaties of different countries in the world, combined with the existing legislation and actual situation of our country. Some suggestions on how to improve the mechanism of parallel litigation in China are put forward. Specifically, this paper is divided into four chapters: the first chapter is the occurrence of parallel litigation. Starting from the concept of parallel litigation in private international law, this chapter analyzes the three constitutive elements of parallel litigation, and points out that parallel litigation in private international law can be divided into international parallel litigation and interregional parallel litigation. In order to accurately define the research object and field. On this basis, we continue to summarize and analyze the multiple areas of parallel litigation. The second chapter is the cause and influence of parallel action. This chapter analyzes the inherent causes of parallel litigation in private international law, including the expansion of national jurisdiction, the parties' own pursuit and the "indulgence" in the norms of international law. At the same time, it also expounds the possible negative effects of parallel litigation, including the waste of judicial resources, the intensification of jurisdiction conflicts between countries, the damage to the interests of the parties and the hindrance to the further development of international exchanges. The third chapter summarizes and evaluates the existing methods to solve the problem of parallel litigation in private international law. This chapter divides the existing methods into domestic law methods and international law methods. The former includes the non bis in idem rule, the inconvenient court rule, the recognition expectation rule, etc. The latter includes the Brussels Convention, the Hague Convention and the efforts made by the Conference on Private International Law in recent years. This chapter analyzes the advantages and problems of these methods and international treaties in order to learn from them. The fourth chapter is the foreign-related civil and commercial litigation in China. This chapter is mainly devoted to solving the problems of our country. Firstly, it summarizes the existing legislation, bilateral or multilateral treaties and the corresponding practice of parallel litigation in our country. Then it objectively analyzes the rationality and irrationality of the existing norms in China from both positive and negative aspects. On the basis of these efforts, this chapter finally puts forward the general ideas and concrete measures to improve the response mechanism of parallel litigation in China. It also makes a special supplement to the inter-regional parallel litigation between the mainland and Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 郭楚;國(guó)際民商事訴訟競(jìng)合法律規(guī)制問(wèn)題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2013年

2 韓丹;國(guó)際民商事訴訟競(jìng)合問(wèn)題研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2186596