【摘要】：不方便法院原則(Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience)作為平衡寬泛管轄權(quán)的工具廣泛應(yīng)用于英美法系國(guó)家,其有效地解決了法院的案件積壓?jiǎn)栴},平衡了當(dāng)事人的權(quán)益,但其過(guò)于靈活的適用方式也為部分大陸法系國(guó)家所不能接受。但隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化,其作為緩和國(guó)際民商事管轄權(quán)沖突的一種有效手段,正被越來(lái)越多的國(guó)家與地區(qū)所接受。雖然我國(guó)對(duì)于是否引入該原則一直存在著分歧,我國(guó)各地方法院和最高人民法院適用該原則的判例已然為我國(guó)引入不方便法院原則提供了實(shí)踐基礎(chǔ)。本文將通過(guò)介紹不方便法院原則產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展的過(guò)程,以揭示其存在的意義與價(jià)值,并對(duì)幾種主要的不方便法院原則模式進(jìn)行分析、比較,為我國(guó)不方便法院原則制度的構(gòu)建提供幾點(diǎn)淺陋見(jiàn)解。 本文正文部分分為四章。 第一章對(duì)不方便法院原則的概念以及其在各國(guó)產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展的歷史過(guò)程進(jìn)行介紹。通過(guò)對(duì)該原則在兩大法系存在形式的闡述,指出各模式中可供借鑒之處。 第二章對(duì)不方便法院原則的最新發(fā)展進(jìn)行了探討。在制定有關(guān)國(guó)際民商事管轄權(quán)公約時(shí)各國(guó)對(duì)于不方便法院原則的爭(zhēng)論,以及美國(guó)最近對(duì)不方便法院原則適用作出的改變都對(duì)不方便法院原則被更多國(guó)家接受產(chǎn)生了較大影響。 第三章主要對(duì)我國(guó)適用不方便法院原則的利弊進(jìn)行了分析,并對(duì)我國(guó)已頒布的相關(guān)政策以及已判決的案例進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。 第四章將在對(duì)各國(guó)不方便法院原則制度比較分析的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)我國(guó)不方便法院原則制度的設(shè)計(jì)提出建議。
[Abstract]:The inconvenient Court principle (Doctrine of Forum Non Convenience), as a tool to balance broad jurisdiction, is widely used in common law countries. It effectively solves the backlog of court cases and balances the rights and interests of the parties. But its too flexible way of application is also unacceptable to some civil law countries. However, with the economic globalization, as an effective means to ease the conflict of international civil and commercial jurisdiction, it is accepted by more and more countries and regions. Although there have been differences on whether to introduce the principle in our country, the jurisprudence of the local courts and the Supreme people's Court has already provided a practical basis for the introduction of the inconvenient court principle in our country. In this paper, the author will introduce the process of the emergence and development of the inconvenient court principle to reveal the significance and value of its existence, and analyze and compare several main modes of the inconvenient court principle. It provides some humble views for the construction of inconvenient court principle system in our country. The text of this paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept of the inconvenient court principle and its historical process of emergence and development in various countries. By expounding the existence form of this principle in the two legal systems, the author points out that the models can be used for reference. The second chapter discusses the latest development of the inconvenient court principle. In formulating the convention on international civil and commercial jurisdiction, the controversy over the principle of inconvenient courts in various countries and the recent changes in the application of the principle of inconvenient courts in the United States have had a great impact on the acceptance of the principle of inconvenient courts by more countries. The third chapter mainly analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of applying the inconvenient court principle in our country, and summarizes the relevant policies and cases that have been issued in our country. On the basis of the comparative analysis of the principle system of inconvenient courts in various countries, the fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on the design of the principle system of inconvenient courts in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997;D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 張淑鈿;;香港不方便法院原則的實(shí)踐及對(duì)內(nèi)地的啟示[J];法律適用;2009年08期

2 徐偉功;;我國(guó)不宜采用不方便法院原則——以不方便法院原則的運(yùn)作環(huán)境與功能為視角[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年01期

3 宋建立;;從中化國(guó)際案看不方便法院原則的最新發(fā)展——兼論我國(guó)區(qū)際民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)沖突的若干思考[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年06期

4 徐偉功;;美國(guó)國(guó)際民事管轄權(quán)中的兩大閥門——不方便法院原則與禁訴命令[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

5 徐偉功;試析《魁北克民法典》第3135條關(guān)于不方便法院原則的規(guī)定[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年06期

6 張建;肖進(jìn)中;;不方便法院原則在涉港澳臺(tái)民商事案件中適用的必要性[J];和田師范�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

7 徐偉功;簡(jiǎn)析國(guó)際民事管轄權(quán)中的不方便法院原則[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

8 徐偉功;;美國(guó)不方便法院原則的典型判例評(píng)析[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 史展;不方便法院原則在中國(guó)的適用[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

2 鄒麗俐;在我國(guó)引入不方便法院原則的相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年

3 董是強(qiáng);論中國(guó)的不方便法院原則之借鑒與構(gòu)建[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2181400