跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制若干問題研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-11 19:43
【摘要】：眾所周知，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對企業(yè)的發(fā)展、對國家經(jīng)濟(jì)的增長乃至人類文明的進(jìn)步都十分重要。企業(yè)間知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的競爭一直處于十分激烈的狀態(tài)。而其中跨國公司往往擁有其所處行業(yè)的重要知識產(chǎn)權(quán)，在相關(guān)市場上具有著優(yōu)勢甚至支配地位。甚至于其之所以能夠發(fā)展壯大，成為行業(yè)巨頭，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)發(fā)揮著十分關(guān)鍵的作用。如微軟公司的發(fā)展就與其擁有的專利技術(shù)與著作權(quán)等知識產(chǎn)權(quán)極其相關(guān)。另外值得注意的是，近些年來，企業(yè)并購甚至跨國并購的浪潮風(fēng)起云涌，而企業(yè)合并有助于進(jìn)一步增強(qiáng)跨國公司的市場支配地位以及其控制知識產(chǎn)權(quán)或進(jìn)行知識產(chǎn)權(quán)部署的能力。尤其在美國，政府為一系列巨型合并活動開了綠燈。并且在2007年全球金融危機(jī)爆發(fā)后，跨國企業(yè)除直接投資與貿(mào)易外更加注重通過建立非股權(quán)經(jīng)營模式發(fā)展或融入全球價值鏈。非股權(quán)經(jīng)營模式本質(zhì)上即是向本地非股權(quán)伙伴轉(zhuǎn)讓知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的一種受合約保護(hù)的形式。 跨國公司利用其市場支配地位濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)以謀求利益最大化的案件頻繁發(fā)生。最著名的莫過于聯(lián)邦司法部與美國20個州司法部訴微軟公司一案了�？梢哉f，知識產(chǎn)權(quán)特有的無形性模糊了權(quán)利的應(yīng)然邊界，而專有性排他地授予權(quán)利人逾矩越界的便利。利益驅(qū)動使跨國企業(yè)將利益最大化設(shè)定為終極追求目標(biāo)，并利用其市場支配地位為自己謀得，而不顧知識產(chǎn)權(quán)推動革新、造福社會的制度意義。濫用的權(quán)利再也無法成為促進(jìn)社會福祉的保障，而相反將異化成為限制合理競爭，鞏固壟斷地位的手段。而此時，探討應(yīng)對跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)則成為合理限制濫用權(quán)利行為的艱難而必需的使命。 本文第一部分將探討跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的現(xiàn)狀及其反壟斷規(guī)制的理論基礎(chǔ)，，第二與第三部分將分別討論發(fā)達(dá)國家（美國）或地區(qū)（歐盟）有關(guān)跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)則與實(shí)踐，第四部分探討有關(guān)跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷國際規(guī)則，第五部分將著重討論我國現(xiàn)行跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法律與實(shí)踐狀況，并提出相應(yīng)的法律完善建議以及國內(nèi)企業(yè)更好應(yīng)對跨國公司濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)限制競爭行為的建議。
[Abstract]:As we all know, intellectual property is very important to the development of enterprises, the growth of national economy and the progress of human civilization. The competition of intellectual property between enterprises has been in a very fierce state. Among them, multinational companies often have important intellectual property rights in their industries, and have advantages or even dominant positions in relevant markets. Even its ability to grow and become an industry giant, intellectual property rights play a very key role. The development of Microsoft, for example, is closely related to its proprietary technology and intellectual property rights such as copyright. In addition, it is worth noting that in recent years, the tide of enterprise M & A and even cross-border M & A has surged. The merger will further enhance the market dominance of multinational companies and their ability to control or deploy intellectual property rights. In the United States in particular, the government gave the green light to a series of giant mergers. After the global financial crisis broke out in 2007, the multinational enterprises pay more attention to developing or integrating into the global value chain through the establishment of non-equity management model except for direct investment and trade. Non-equity management mode is essentially a form of contract-protected transfer of intellectual property to local non-equity partners. The cases of multinational corporations abusing intellectual property rights to maximize their profits by using their dominant position in the market occur frequently. The best-known case is the Federal Department of Justice and the Justice Department of 20 States of the United States v. Microsoft. It can be said that the intangibility of intellectual property rights obscures the proper boundary of rights, and exclusive grant to the obligee the convenience of exceeding the moment. The profit-driven enterprises set the maximization of profits as the ultimate goal and make use of their dominant position in the market to gain for themselves without regard to the institutional significance of promoting innovation and benefiting the society by intellectual property. Abuse of rights can no longer be a guarantee to promote social welfare, on the contrary, alienation will become a means to restrict reasonable competition and consolidate monopoly position. At this time, it is a difficult and necessary mission to discuss the anti-monopoly law rules to deal with the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations. The first part of this paper will discuss the current situation of transnational corporations' intellectual property abuse and the theoretical basis of anti-monopoly regulation. The second and third parts will discuss the anti-monopoly law rules and practices of developed countries (US) or regions (EU) on the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations, and the fourth part will discuss the international anti-monopoly rules on the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations. The fifth part will focus on the current situation of anti-monopoly law and practice of the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations in China, and put forward the corresponding suggestions on how to perfect the law and how to deal with the abuse of intellectual property rights of domestic enterprises to limit competition behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D922.294;D996.1
本文編號：2178054
[Abstract]:As we all know, intellectual property is very important to the development of enterprises, the growth of national economy and the progress of human civilization. The competition of intellectual property between enterprises has been in a very fierce state. Among them, multinational companies often have important intellectual property rights in their industries, and have advantages or even dominant positions in relevant markets. Even its ability to grow and become an industry giant, intellectual property rights play a very key role. The development of Microsoft, for example, is closely related to its proprietary technology and intellectual property rights such as copyright. In addition, it is worth noting that in recent years, the tide of enterprise M & A and even cross-border M & A has surged. The merger will further enhance the market dominance of multinational companies and their ability to control or deploy intellectual property rights. In the United States in particular, the government gave the green light to a series of giant mergers. After the global financial crisis broke out in 2007, the multinational enterprises pay more attention to developing or integrating into the global value chain through the establishment of non-equity management model except for direct investment and trade. Non-equity management mode is essentially a form of contract-protected transfer of intellectual property to local non-equity partners. The cases of multinational corporations abusing intellectual property rights to maximize their profits by using their dominant position in the market occur frequently. The best-known case is the Federal Department of Justice and the Justice Department of 20 States of the United States v. Microsoft. It can be said that the intangibility of intellectual property rights obscures the proper boundary of rights, and exclusive grant to the obligee the convenience of exceeding the moment. The profit-driven enterprises set the maximization of profits as the ultimate goal and make use of their dominant position in the market to gain for themselves without regard to the institutional significance of promoting innovation and benefiting the society by intellectual property. Abuse of rights can no longer be a guarantee to promote social welfare, on the contrary, alienation will become a means to restrict reasonable competition and consolidate monopoly position. At this time, it is a difficult and necessary mission to discuss the anti-monopoly law rules to deal with the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations. The first part of this paper will discuss the current situation of transnational corporations' intellectual property abuse and the theoretical basis of anti-monopoly regulation. The second and third parts will discuss the anti-monopoly law rules and practices of developed countries (US) or regions (EU) on the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations, and the fourth part will discuss the international anti-monopoly rules on the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations. The fifth part will focus on the current situation of anti-monopoly law and practice of the abuse of intellectual property rights of transnational corporations in China, and put forward the corresponding suggestions on how to perfect the law and how to deal with the abuse of intellectual property rights of domestic enterprises to limit competition behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D922.294;D996.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳濤;;對跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制——從思科訴華為案談起[J];中華商標(biāo);2009年01期
2 江清云;單曉光;;歐美知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域中的反壟斷訴訟及其經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];比較法研究;2008年02期
3 余東華;;價格歧視、經(jīng)銷商串貨與反壟斷分析——以“諾基亞事件”為例[J];財貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年04期
4 陳瑋;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷規(guī)制[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2005年06期
5 喬生;中國限制外國企業(yè)對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的立法思考[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期
6 高蘭英;;在華跨國公司濫用知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的反壟斷法規(guī)制問題研究[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2011年02期
7 路偉;;從華為-思科案看知識產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略[J];法人雜志;2006年10期
8 鄭友德;胡章怡;;歐盟知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷問題研究——以歐盟新修訂的《技術(shù)許可協(xié)議集體豁免條例》為中心[J];法學(xué)評論;2006年06期
9 王海燕;;迫在眉睫:知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的戰(zhàn)略性威脅——思科訴訟華為案的啟示[J];廣東科技;2007年05期
10 劉宇;;后TRIPS時代知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用行為的反壟斷規(guī)制[J];廣東科技;2010年14期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條
1 沈菁;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的反壟斷法律規(guī)制[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
2 黃霞;跨國公司知識產(chǎn)權(quán)濫用的反壟斷法規(guī)制研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年
3 劉麗;國際技術(shù)貿(mào)易中限制性商業(yè)做法及其法律規(guī)制[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年
4 高曉瑞;跨國公司在華投資中與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的若干法律問題研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2009年
5 李斌;跨國公司專利權(quán)濫用的法律規(guī)制[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年
本文編號：2178054
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2178054.html
最近更新
教材專著
