【摘要】：由于全球貿(mào)易不斷增長(zhǎng)而美歐日等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家受到金融危機(jī)的影響、經(jīng)濟(jì)面臨衰退,亞洲發(fā)展中國(guó)家迎來(lái)了貿(mào)易繁榮時(shí)期。發(fā)展中國(guó)家的經(jīng)濟(jì)崛起與發(fā)展,對(duì)發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)形成了巨大的挑戰(zhàn)。為把握國(guó)際貿(mào)易主動(dòng)權(quán),發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家又一次利用自身的技術(shù)優(yōu)勢(shì),嘗試提高國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),即繞過(guò)《與貿(mào)易相關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)定》(《TRIPS協(xié)定》)建立更嚴(yán)格的保護(hù)協(xié)定。目前處于談判中的《跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定》(Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement,即《TPP協(xié)定》)就是其中之一。由美國(guó)草擬的TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)草案不僅納入了商標(biāo)、專(zhuān)利和版權(quán)等知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)實(shí)體權(quán)利,而且還囊括了包括數(shù)字環(huán)境下等諸多知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法相關(guān)議題。該草案與《TRIPS協(xié)定》有諸多不同規(guī)定,遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超過(guò)《TRIPS協(xié)定》的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)水平,不僅可能影響其談判國(guó)法律的修改,并在其國(guó)內(nèi)也引起諸多爭(zhēng)議。然而由于我國(guó)許多產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展尚不成熟,創(chuàng)新能力不足,有的仍處于“幼兒”階段；以及我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)體系不甚健全,一旦高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的《TPP協(xié)定》生效,作為世界第二代經(jīng)濟(jì)體,我國(guó)的對(duì)外貿(mào)易以及相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展必然受到巨大的沖擊。本文首先介紹《TPP協(xié)定》草案的發(fā)展歷程及其所處國(guó)際背景,從其發(fā)展歷程及國(guó)際背景中具體闡明該草案所具有的的特征,其次,重點(diǎn)分析《TPP協(xié)定》草案與《TRIPS協(xié)定》、《ACTA協(xié)定》(反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定(ACTA:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement)不同之處,對(duì)其與《TRIPS協(xié)定》、《ACTA協(xié)定》知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度中版權(quán)保護(hù)、商標(biāo)保護(hù)、專(zhuān)利保護(hù)、知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法措施進(jìn)行多方面比較研究,從中說(shuō)明其對(duì)當(dāng)今世界知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的提高和跨越,這也是本文最大的難點(diǎn)。最后,為了增加驗(yàn)證性,筆者引用相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)并制作了圖表,以此重新審視《TPP協(xié)定》草案可能對(duì)我國(guó)貼牌加工貿(mào)易及相關(guān)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)密集型產(chǎn)業(yè)造成的負(fù)面影響。由于筆者對(duì)國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的研究深度不足,以及知識(shí)、能力有限,本文對(duì)我國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)策略提了幾點(diǎn)建議,尚不能做到面面俱到,但仍期望對(duì)我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)保護(hù)和對(duì)外貿(mào)易發(fā)展有著積極的作用。
[Abstract]:Due to the growing global trade, developed countries such as the United States, Europe, Japan and other developed countries have been affected by the financial crisis and their economies are facing recession, and Asian developing countries have ushered in a period of trade boom. The economic rise and development of developing countries have posed a great challenge to the economies of developed countries. In order to grasp the initiative of international trade, developed countries once again make use of their own technological advantages to try to improve the standards of international intellectual property protection, that is, to circumvent the Agreement on Trade-Related intellectual property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) to establish a more stringent protection agreement. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP Agreement), which is currently under negotiation, is one of them. The TPP intellectual property draft, drafted by the United States, includes not only trademark, patent and copyright rights, but also a number of issues related to intellectual property enforcement, including in the digital environment. The draft has many different provisions from the TRIPS Agreement, which far exceeds the level of intellectual property protection of the TRIPS Agreement, which may not only affect the amendment of the law of its negotiating country, but also cause many disputes in its own country. However, because many industries in China are not mature, some are still in the "early childhood" stage, and the intellectual property protection system of our country is not perfect, once the high standard TPP Agreement comes into effect, as the second generation economy in the world, The development of China's foreign trade and related industries is bound to be greatly impacted. This paper first introduces the development course of the draft TPP Agreement and its international background, and expounds the characteristics of the draft from its development process and international background. This paper focuses on the analysis of the draft of the TPP Agreement and the TRIPS Agreement, the ACTA Agreement (the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA:Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement) is different from the TRIPS Agreement, the ACTA Agreement, the intellectual property Protection system of the ACTA Agreement, the copyright protection, the trademark protection, the patent protection, This paper makes a comparative study on the enforcement measures of intellectual property rights, and explains the improvement and leapfrogging of the intellectual property protection system in the world, which is also the most difficult point in this paper. Finally, in order to increase the verifiability, the author cites the relevant data and makes a chart to re-examine the negative impact of the draft of the TPP Agreement on the processing trade and related intellectual property intensive industries in China. Due to the lack of research on the protection of international intellectual property rights, as well as the limited knowledge and ability, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the countermeasures of our country, which can not cover all aspects. However, it is expected to play a positive role in the protection of knowledge production and the development of foreign trade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.1;D996.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 倪月菊;;中國(guó)如何應(yīng)對(duì)TPP談判[J];黨政論壇(干部文摘);2013年07期

2 熊李力;龍絲露;;日本加入TPP談判的動(dòng)機(jī)及其影響[J];現(xiàn)代國(guó)際關(guān)系;2013年09期

3 劉昌黎;;日本參加TPP談判的動(dòng)因、制約因素與政策措施[J];日本學(xué)刊;2011年01期

4 劉迪;;TPP給日本帶來(lái)什么?[J];新民周刊;2011年44期

5 劉迪;;如何“出牌”應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)TPP意圖?[J];新民周刊;2011年46期

6 于凱旋;;喧嘩與騷動(dòng)TPP談判引起的軒然大波[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年01期

7 鄭雙雙;;淺析TPP協(xié)定投資草案[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年10期

8 陳友駿;;TPP的戰(zhàn)略考量[J];領(lǐng)導(dǎo)之友;2012年01期

9 徐秀軍;;美日經(jīng)貿(mào)關(guān)系演變掣肘TPP談判[J];世界知識(shí);2014年10期

10 賀平;;日本緣何中意TPP[J];時(shí)事報(bào)告;2012年03期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 周冬梅;陳東明;王秀燕;張保忠;何天敬;辛厚文;劉凡鎮(zhèn);;固體H_4~(2+)TPP的共振Raman光譜研究[A];全國(guó)第六屆分子振動(dòng)光譜學(xué)術(shù)報(bào)告會(huì)文集[C];1990年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 吳正龍;日本加入TPP談判之路不平坦[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2012年

2 吳洪英;墨西哥為何積極加盟TPP[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

3 本報(bào)記者 陳大雪　江瑋;TPP抑或“東盟+N”？ 中美暗戰(zhàn)區(qū)域自由貿(mào)易[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào)道;2013年

4 編譯 丁咚 黃婧;美國(guó)企業(yè)力挺馬來(lái)西亞加入TPP談判[N];中國(guó)電子報(bào);2014年

5 中國(guó)太平洋經(jīng)濟(jì)合作全國(guó)委員會(huì)秘書(shū)長(zhǎng) 吳正龍;TPP：蒙著面紗的談判[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

6 駐馬來(lái)西亞使館經(jīng)商處;馬來(lái)西亞進(jìn)行TPP談判替代馬美自貿(mào)談判[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2011年

7 中國(guó)太平洋經(jīng)濟(jì)合作全國(guó)委員會(huì)副會(huì)長(zhǎng) 吳正龍;日本為何難入TPP談判[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

8 梁寶衛(wèi)　編譯;日本面對(duì)TPP應(yīng)有長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)眼光[N];上海證券報(bào);2012年

9 中國(guó)太平洋經(jīng)濟(jì)合作全國(guó)委員會(huì)副會(huì)長(zhǎng) 吳正龍;TPP談判為何久拖不決[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

10 記者 劉軍國(guó);日本正式宣布加入TPP談判[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 石潯;美國(guó)跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定（TPP）對(duì)于東北亞區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)合作的影響[D];遼寧大學(xué);2015年

2 馬靈飛;TPP知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及其應(yīng)對(duì)[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

3 蔣陽(yáng)陽(yáng);國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)新動(dòng)向：《TPP協(xié)定》及其對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)際貿(mào)易的影響分析[D];南京財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2014年

4 張飚;澳大利亞參與TPP談判的原因和挑戰(zhàn)分析[D];外交學(xué)院;2015年

5 邢路明;日本參加泛太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)定（TPP）談判的政策與前景[D];吉林大學(xué);2014年

6 范福萍;日本的TPP戰(zhàn)略及其對(duì)中國(guó)的影響[D];湘潭大學(xué);2014年

7 王虎;美國(guó)戰(zhàn)略東移背景下的TPP及對(duì)中國(guó)e笥跋靃D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

8 常博;日本加入TPP相關(guān)問(wèn)題研究及前景分析[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2012年

9 陳庭翰;美國(guó)推動(dòng)跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)議（TPP）的戰(zhàn)略構(gòu)想分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

10 柴慶冬;日本參加TPP的動(dòng)因與制約因素研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2178043