【摘要】：一直以來,航運界和司法界都留傳著船級社免責的慣例,然而近年來數(shù)起大型船舶油類泄漏造成災難性生態(tài)污染事件的發(fā)生,卻讓國際各界對此免責傳統(tǒng)及該傳統(tǒng)依據(jù)的抗辯理由產生質疑。作為航運界不可或缺的組織,海洋環(huán)境和海上安全的重要保衛(wèi)者,到底應該如何判定船級社在油污損害賠償案件中的第三方責任?本文通過四部分進行論述,主要內容如下： 第一部分主要介紹船舶油污損害賠償中船級社第三方責任的含義以及船級社第三方責任由長期謹慎階段到短暫松動階段再至恢復保守階段的歷史沿革。 第二部分詳細剖析船舶油污損害賠償中船級社的主要抗辯理由。本章共包括非締約國無管轄權、《1992年國際油污損害民事責任公約》(簡稱CLC)第Ⅲ(4)條的適用和國家豁免理論三個部分,通過對CLC相關條款以及國際法和國際私法理論的系統(tǒng)闡述,確定了船舶油污損害賠償中船級社可以依據(jù)和不可受益的抗辯理由。 第三部分重點論述中國法下船舶油污損害賠償中船級社的第三方責任。本章在第二部分的基礎上,系統(tǒng)的分析了中國法下涉外和非涉外船舶油污損害賠償中船級社第三方責任的法律適用和責任承擔問題。 第四部分系統(tǒng)探究船舶油污損害賠償中船級社第三方責任的發(fā)展趨勢。本章詳細的介紹了油污事故發(fā)生后國際社會對船級的強烈反應,并結合船級社的性質及立法現(xiàn)狀大膽地對船級社的發(fā)展趨勢做出預測,提出相應的對策和建議。 希望本文對船舶油污損害賠償中船級社第三方責任的深入研究,能為航運界和司法界確定船級社的侵權責任起到借鑒作用,并最終對全球海洋環(huán)境的保護和國際船舶油污損害賠償制度的完善有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The shipping industry and the judiciary have kept the practice of classification society exemption. However, in recent years, there have been several catastrophic ecological pollution incidents caused by oil spills from large ships. However, the international community to this tradition of exemption and the traditional basis of the defense reasons to question. As an indispensable organization in the shipping industry, an important defender of marine environment and maritime safety, how can classification societies be judged to be third party liability in oil pollution compensation cases? This paper is discussed in four parts. The main contents are as follows: the first part mainly introduces the meaning of classification society third party liability in ship oil pollution damage compensation and the third party liability of classification society from long-term cautious stage to brief loosening stage and then to recovery. The history of the conservative stage. The second part analyzes the main defense of classification society in ship oil pollution damage compensation in detail. This chapter consists of three parts: the application of Article III (4) of the 1992 International Convention on Civil liability for Oil pollution damage (CLC) and the theory of State immunity, which are described systematically through the relevant provisions of CLC and the theories of international law and private international law. The defense that classification society can base and not benefit in the compensation for oil pollution damage is determined. The third part focuses on the third party liability of classification society in oil pollution compensation under Chinese law. On the basis of the second part, this chapter systematically analyzes the legal application and liability of classification society in the compensation for oil pollution damage caused by foreign and non-foreign ships under Chinese law. The fourth part systematically explores the development trend of third party liability of classification society in ship oil pollution compensation. This chapter introduces in detail the strong reaction of the international community to the classification of ships after the oil pollution accident, and makes a bold prediction of the development trend of the classification society combined with the nature of the classification society and the present legislative situation, and puts forward the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions. It is hoped that the in-depth study of the third-party liability of classification societies in the compensation for ship oil pollution damage can serve as a reference for determining the tort liability of classification societies in shipping and judicial circles. Finally, it is beneficial to the protection of the global marine environment and the improvement of the international ship oil pollution compensation system.
【學位授予單位】：大連海事大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D99;D922.6;D923

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 周夢華;船級社侵權責任法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學;2012年

，

本文編號：2177859