【摘要】：鑒于海上貨物運(yùn)輸?shù)膰H性和調(diào)整對象的特殊性,提單的有關(guān)法律問題產(chǎn)生了國際統(tǒng)一的需求,但關(guān)于提單貨物代表功能的法律規(guī)范卻難以達(dá)成國際統(tǒng)一基于我國的法律體系下如何理解與適用提單貨物代表功能的法律實(shí)踐需要,以及《聯(lián)合國全程或部分海上國際貨物運(yùn)輸合同公約》(以下簡稱《鹿特丹規(guī)則》)若對我國生效,其有關(guān)提單貨物代表功能的規(guī)則如何適用于我國法律體系內(nèi)的思考,本文對我國現(xiàn)行法下提單法律性質(zhì)的定位進(jìn)行了再審視。 第一章介紹了國內(nèi)外關(guān)于提單性質(zhì)的學(xué)說和立法,并在比較法理論的基礎(chǔ)上,對相關(guān)的立法和學(xué)說進(jìn)行了比較研究,以期在宏觀上建立對于提單法律性質(zhì)的認(rèn)識,并在該認(rèn)識的基礎(chǔ)上得出了審視我國現(xiàn)行法下提單性質(zhì)時應(yīng)遵從的原則。 第二章對占有制度原理,包括占有的性質(zhì)、構(gòu)成、讓與、效力以及保護(hù)等各個方面進(jìn)行了理論梳理,并立足于現(xiàn)行法之占有制度進(jìn)行了法律適用上的考量。由此,通過對占有理論和現(xiàn)行法適用的分析為下文之論證打下了理論基礎(chǔ)。 第三章立足于占有制度,通過引入歸納論證法和演繹論證法兩種論證方法,從動態(tài)入手對提單在國際貿(mào)易、國際金融以及國際海上貨物運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域所體現(xiàn)出的提單貨物代表功能進(jìn)行了分析與整合,對我國現(xiàn)行法下提單性質(zhì)之“占有憑證”說進(jìn)行了整體嚴(yán)格的論證。 第四章則立足于提單性質(zhì)之“占有憑證”說,對提單運(yùn)輸下貨物交付與提取、運(yùn)費(fèi)支付、提單簽發(fā)、貨物控制權(quán)以及權(quán)利轉(zhuǎn)讓等幾項(xiàng)提單實(shí)踐中的法律問題進(jìn)行了理論和實(shí)踐層面的再思考,并進(jìn)一步論證了“占有憑證”說與提單實(shí)踐的相合性。 本文始于對現(xiàn)有各學(xué)說的研究,基于現(xiàn)行法下占有制度之視角,立足于國際貿(mào)易、金融和海上貨物運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域可流通提單的法律性質(zhì)問題,提出提單性質(zhì)為“占有憑證”這一論點(diǎn),并通過分析占有理論與提單實(shí)踐的相合性來論證其合理性,進(jìn)而將其應(yīng)用于解決海上貨物運(yùn)輸領(lǐng)域提單理論與實(shí)踐問題。
[Abstract]:In view of the international character of the carriage of goods by sea and the particularity of the object of adjustment, the legal issues related to the bill of lading have created a demand for international unity, However, it is difficult for the legal norms on the representative function of bill of lading to reach the international unification. How to understand and apply the function of the bill of lading under the legal system of our country is needed in the legal practice. And if the United Nations Convention on contracts for the International Carriage of goods wholly or partly by Sea (hereinafter referred to as the Rotterdam rules) comes into force for our country, how its rules relating to the representative function of goods on bills of lading apply to the legal system of our country, This paper reexamines the legal nature of bill of lading under the current law of our country. The first chapter introduces the theory and legislation about the nature of bill of lading at home and abroad, and on the basis of comparative law theory, makes a comparative study on the relevant legislation and doctrine, in order to establish a macroscopic understanding of the legal nature of bill of lading. On the basis of this understanding, the principles should be followed when examining the nature of bill of lading under the current law of our country. In the second chapter, the theory of possession system, including the nature, constitution, transfer, effectiveness and protection of possession system is analyzed theoretically, and the application of the law is considered based on the possession system of current law. Therefore, through the analysis of the theory of possession and the application of the current law, the theoretical foundation is laid for the following argument. The third chapter is based on the possession system, through the introduction of inductive argumentation and deductive argumentation, from the dynamic point of view of the bill of lading in international trade, This paper analyzes and integrates the representative function of bill of lading in the field of international finance and international carriage of goods by sea, and gives a strict demonstration of the nature of the bill of lading under the current law of our country. The fourth chapter is based on the nature of the bill of lading "possession" theory, the delivery and extraction of goods under the bill of lading transport, freight payment, bill of lading issued, The legal problems in the practice of bill of lading, such as the right of control of goods and the transfer of rights, are reconsidered in theory and practice, and the consistency between the theory of "possession certificate" and the practice of bill of lading is further demonstrated. This paper begins with the study of the existing theories, based on the perspective of the possession system under the current law, and based on the legal nature of negotiable bills of lading in the fields of international trade, finance and carriage of goods by sea. This paper puts forward the argument that the nature of bill of lading is "proof of possession", and proves its rationality by analyzing the coincidence between possession theory and practice of bill of lading, and then applies it to solve the theoretical and practical problems of bill of lading in the field of carriage of goods by sea.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.19

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 裘丹楓;電放法律問題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2156489