發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-29 11:36

【摘要】：體育帶給了人們無窮的樂趣,在體育世界里,人們可以找到激情,頑強(qiáng)拼搏和團(tuán)隊(duì)協(xié)作的精神以及公平競賽的理念。可以說體育世界是人們在市場經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)中寄托純真感情的一片凈土。但賽場判罰完全不予審查的做法,卻與體育的公平公正精神相違背。 賽場判罰不予審查原則是法院或仲裁庭在處理與裁判判罰有關(guān)案件時(shí)經(jīng)常適用的一個(gè)基本原則,該原則在保證體育比賽的正常秩序和維護(hù)體育比賽結(jié)果的確定性方面,有一定的積極性作用。但如果仔細(xì)研究該原則,就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)許多不合理之處,首先,雖然賽場判罰不予審查原則已經(jīng)被反復(fù)適用,但賽場判罰是什么,為什么不能對(duì)賽場判罰進(jìn)行審查,這些問題以往的法院判決書和仲裁裁判書并沒有給出明確答案,理論界也沒有界定。其次,文章作者認(rèn)為,該原則的行成是建立在體育組織對(duì)運(yùn)動(dòng)員的管理權(quán)之上的,而運(yùn)動(dòng)員因?qū)︐悎霾门辛P不服而產(chǎn)生的糾紛是糾紛產(chǎn)生的重災(zāi)區(qū),體育管理者企圖通過犧牲運(yùn)動(dòng)員的權(quán)益,而一勞永逸的解決此類糾紛。該原則是極其霸道與蠻橫的,體育組織利用其管理者的超然身份,無視運(yùn)動(dòng)員的權(quán)益,這與體育組織促進(jìn)體育發(fā)展和維護(hù)運(yùn)動(dòng)員利益的宗旨是不相符的,與公平正義的體育精神也是相背離的。特別是要引起注意的是在整個(gè)世界都在向民主法治邁進(jìn)的時(shí)候,體育世界卻一步步走向了專制與獨(dú)裁,體育組織限制運(yùn)動(dòng)員權(quán)利的情況屢有發(fā)生,這是相當(dāng)危險(xiǎn)的,歷史告訴我們暴力和蠻橫不能從根本上解決糾紛,只會(huì)導(dǎo)致糾紛的大爆發(fā)。本文分別從法理角度、制度角度以及概念角度對(duì)賽場判罰不予審查原則進(jìn)行分析,論證了該原則存在諸多不合理之處,認(rèn)為絕對(duì)的堅(jiān)持賽場判罰不予審查原則是不應(yīng)該的,應(yīng)當(dāng)對(duì)該原則進(jìn)行完善,本文最后提出了完善該原則的建議。
[Abstract]:Sports bring people a lot of fun. In the world of sports, people can find passion, the spirit of hard work and teamwork, and the idea of fair play. It can be said that the world of sports is a pure land in which people in the market economy society ascribe pure feelings. However, the practice of not censoring the field is contrary to the spirit of fairness and fairness in sports. The principle of non-review of court decisions is a basic principle frequently applied by courts or arbitral tribunals in dealing with cases related to the adjudication of decisions, which guarantees the normal order of sports matches and maintains certainty in the results of sports competitions, Have certain positive effect. However, if we carefully study this principle, we will find that there are many unreasonable points. First, although the principle of non-review of court decisions has been repeatedly applied, what is the penalty in the field and why can't it be reviewed? These questions have not been clearly answered in previous court judgments and arbitration decisions, nor have they been defined by the theorists. Secondly, the author thinks that the principle is based on the management power of the sports organization to the athletes, and the disputes caused by the athletes' disagreement with the referee and punishment are the most serious areas of the disputes. Sports administrators attempt to settle such disputes once and for all by sacrificing the rights of athletes. This principle is extremely domineering and outrageous. Sports organizations take advantage of their transcendent status as managers and ignore the rights and interests of athletes, which is incompatible with the purpose of sports organizations to promote the development of sports and to safeguard the interests of athletes. It also deviates from the spirit of fair and just sports. In particular, we should pay attention to the fact that while the whole world is moving towards democracy and the rule of law, the sports world has gradually moved towards autocracy and dictatorship, and sports organizations have repeatedly restricted the rights of athletes. This is quite dangerous. History tells us that violence and insolence can only lead to a great outbreak of disputes. This paper analyzes the principle of non-review of penalty from the angle of legal theory, system and concept, and proves that there are many unreasonable points in the principle, and holds that it is not right to insist absolutely on the principle of not reviewing the penalty on the court. We should perfect this principle, and finally put forward some suggestions to perfect it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李力;;正是沙場點(diǎn)兵時(shí)——廣東省警犬技術(shù)比賽實(shí)錄[J];中國工作犬業(yè);2011年06期

2 馬德;;誰拉你走向了平庸?[J];戀愛婚姻家庭(青春);2011年08期

3 ;法律的社會(huì)控制[J];南京醫(yī)科大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年04期

4 滄海;;王貝之殤:何種美麗需要青春陪葬[J];分憂;2011年03期

5 劉名遠(yuǎn);;神秘的預(yù)測之夢[J];奇聞怪事;2011年07期

6 ;金昌團(tuán)市委舉辦“祖國在我心中”演講比賽[J];新一代;2009年10期

7 沐澤;;中華臺(tái)北隊(duì)廣州亞運(yùn)勇奪13金創(chuàng)12年來最佳戰(zhàn)績[J];臺(tái)聲;2010年12期

8 ;2010年京津滬渝粵五地律師羽毛球賽在滬舉行[J];中國律師;2010年07期

9 趙東平;;美國業(yè)余體育法及其對(duì)中國的啟示[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

10 賴勤;;透視金牌與健康之議[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2152555