跨界環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)在核安全法律制度中的構(gòu)建
[Abstract]:In the international community, there are more and more environmental pollution and damage in the international community, and if nuclear leakage occurs in the process of nuclear energy utilization, the persistence of environmental factors, such as atmosphere, soil, and ocean, is often caused by the environmental impact of trans national boundaries with the biological cycle, and the ring outside the jurisdiction of other countries and countries. As one of the mechanisms of preventing cross-border environmental problems, the transboundary environmental impact assessment system, as one of the mechanisms for preventing cross-border environmental problems, has a solid theoretical accumulation and development prospects. However, in view of its still in its initial stage of development, it is necessary for us to carry out a macro and detailed analysis of the system in order to benefit the system to a wider range. In the peaceful use of nuclear energy, the peaceful use of nuclear energy requires both the demand for the introduction of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment and the legal basis for the introduction of the system. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of the transboundary environmental impact assessment system and the establishment of a system for the implementation of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment procedures in the field of nuclear safety can achieve theoretical value and practice. Through consultation of information communication and preventive measures in advance, it is beneficial to prevent transboundary damage caused by nuclear leakage, strengthen cooperation and exchange between state and state, guarantee the safe use of nuclear energy and avoid the emergence of international disputes. Through historical research, this paper explores the production and development of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment. By using the text analysis method, this paper analyzes the shortcomings and problems of the existing legal norms of the existing cross boundary environmental impact assessment, and makes a full paving for the next step. At the same time, the article mainly uses the method of combining theory and practice, and puts forward the construction of the necessity and feasibility of applying the system of transboundary environmental impact assessment to the field of nuclear safety. The path and way of the nuclear safety cross boundary environmental impact assessment are aimed at establishing a more perfect cross boundary environmental impact assessment system in nuclear safety as an important means to prevent the production of transboundary nuclear pollution.
In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into four parts. The key issues and objectives are to build a transboundary environmental impact assessment system for nuclear safety.
The first part mainly introduces the cross boundary environmental impact assessment, and lays a theoretical foundation for the application of the legal system of nuclear safety. This part first puts forward the concept of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment, then analyzes the significance of the existence of the system and reviews the historical evolution of the emergence and development of the cross boundary environmental impact evaluation. We can realize that although the system has just come into being in recent decades and has not yet formed a global framework convention, its role and value still have a certain space for development in the future. Then the part focuses on the theoretical basis of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment, and points out the principles of international law that refer to the establishment and development of the system, There is an inseparable and interdependent relationship between different principles of international law and the system of cross boundary environmental impact assessment. The principles of international law guide and promote the production and improvement of the latter. The latter is the concrete embodiment and institutional guarantee of the former. Finally, the development of the cross boundary EIA is introduced, and the relationship between the international law and the principles of international law is also introduced. The nuclear safety law system plays a role in building the transboundary EIA.
The second part first analyzes the application of cross boundary environmental impact assessment in three different areas and illustrates with concrete examples. In addition to a number of useful transboundary environmental impact assessment practices (Caspian area as an example) between countries, the global commons need to consider the shared areas and resources among countries in the global commons. In practice, some international financial institutions have taken the cross boundary environmental impact assessment as one of the important conditions for capital lending. Secondly, this part of this part has made a detailed review of the difficulties faced in the application of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment. It is found that the system of cross boundary environmental impact assessment is not comprehensive and clear in terms of information exchange and public participation in the treaty. In practical application, there are many problems in the practical application, such as excessive procedural meaning and poor operability. Therefore, the relevant contents of the system need to be perfected.
The third part, on the basis of the first two parts, focuses on the application of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment in the field of nuclear safety. The characteristics of the possible generation of transboundary damage in the utilization of nuclear energy and the relevant legal provisions call for the application of the system in nuclear safety. The obstacles we face will lay a solid foundation for the next step in the construction of the EIA system in this field.
The fourth part focuses on the analysis of the path of the application of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment in the field of nuclear safety. In the expansion of the two ways to expand the application of the accede to the acceding country directly in the field of nuclear security or the establishment of a transboundary environmental impact assessment system in nuclear safety, the proposed approach is built. Then the part is detailed. The construction method is discussed in detail. It should be enriched in ideas and ideas, get the recognition of the system, improve the content, and play an important role in the International Atomic Energy Agency and international financial institutions. Finally, based on the actual situation of China's law, we should push the establishment of the cross boundary environmental impact assessment in the field of nuclear safety.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D999.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 汪群;鐘尉;張陽(yáng);;協(xié)商民主視角的跨界水事糾紛治理[J];水利經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年05期
2 瞿瞿;;“超男”戴軍的新感覺(jué)[J];中國(guó)女性(文海外版);2006年02期
3 黃錫生,唐紹均;對(duì)編制規(guī)劃的機(jī)關(guān)成為環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)主體的法律思考[J];重慶建筑大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2003年06期
4 李?lèi)?ài)年,胡春冬;中美戰(zhàn)略環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)制度的比較研究[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2004年01期
5 ;河南省建設(shè)項(xiàng)目環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)文件分級(jí)審批規(guī)定[J];河南省人民政府公報(bào);2005年06期
6 王韶華;蘇穎;李貴寶;;中國(guó)環(huán)境保護(hù)法與俄羅斯聯(lián)邦環(huán)境保護(hù)法的對(duì)比[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2007年01期
7 曲頎;浙贛邊界盛開(kāi)文明之花[J];今日浙江;2001年22期
8 馬軼男;;淺談國(guó)際法中的共同開(kāi)發(fā)制度[J];中山大學(xué)研究生學(xué)刊(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期
9 史娜;;關(guān)于光污染立法的思考[J];內(nèi)蒙古科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年05期
10 李英;我國(guó)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)中的公眾參與[J];山西煤炭管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 曾紅艷;;初探實(shí)施環(huán)境管理體系與環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)工作關(guān)系[A];廣西環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2002—2003年度學(xué)術(shù)論文集[C];2003年
2 周玉梅;;公眾參與環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)勢(shì)在必行[A];山東環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2002年度學(xué)術(shù)論文集[C];2003年
3 李宇斌;;關(guān)于環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)及其管理的思考[A];中國(guó)環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)優(yōu)秀論文集(中卷)[C];2006年
4 許向?qū)?李勝偉;唐川;黃潤(rùn)秋;袁永旭;;金沙江干流梯級(jí)水電開(kāi)發(fā)對(duì)生態(tài)地質(zhì)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)[A];中國(guó)地質(zhì)學(xué)會(huì)工程地質(zhì)專業(yè)委員會(huì)2007年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)暨“生態(tài)環(huán)境脆弱區(qū)工程地質(zhì)”學(xué)術(shù)論壇論文集[C];2007年
5 劉英彩;喬潤(rùn)卓;;城市總體規(guī)劃環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)初探[A];中國(guó)環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)優(yōu)秀論文集(上卷)[C];2006年
6 羅春;彭民浩;彭輝;李萍;桂賢豐;;關(guān)于環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)中公眾參與的探討[A];第十屆中國(guó)科協(xié)年會(huì)論文集(二)[C];2008年
7 彭民浩;羅春;彭輝;李萍;桂賢豐;;關(guān)于環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)中公眾參與的探討[A];第十屆中國(guó)科協(xié)年會(huì)論文集(三)[C];2008年
8 蔡玉梅;鄭偉元;賈克敬;楊楓;;土地利用規(guī)劃環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)探討[A];21世紀(jì)中國(guó)土地科學(xué)與經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展——中國(guó)土地學(xué)會(huì)2003年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2003年
9 徐春陽(yáng);丘文先;吳新勝;付云燕;吳杰;沈偉;;擴(kuò)散模式在垃圾發(fā)電廠環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[A];中國(guó)氣象學(xué)會(huì)2008年年會(huì)大氣環(huán)境監(jiān)測(cè)、預(yù)報(bào)與污染物控制分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文集[C];2008年
10 耿紅;孔亞平;陳濟(jì)丁;徐憲立;;公路規(guī)劃環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)技術(shù)的研究[A];中國(guó)公路學(xué)會(huì)04’學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2004年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 本報(bào)記者 周元春;四條跨界公交即將開(kāi)通[N];深圳特區(qū)報(bào);2009年
2 王維;跨界合作:讓動(dòng)漫盈利持續(xù)擴(kuò)大[N];中國(guó)文化報(bào);2010年
3 錢(qián)立平;跨界營(yíng)銷(xiāo)新突破吉奧國(guó)美攜手雙贏[N];中國(guó)貿(mào)易報(bào);2009年
4 王猛;跨界營(yíng)銷(xiāo) 定制為王[N];中國(guó)郵政報(bào);2010年
5 董學(xué)峰 黃虎波;石馬河 跨界治污的樣本期待[N];東莞日?qǐng)?bào);2010年
6 記者 張劍雯;我省地表水跨界斷面水質(zhì)考核“獎(jiǎng)少罰多”[N];山西經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2010年
7 黃昌珊 許蘊(yùn);戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)層級(jí)模糊呼喚跨界作戰(zhàn)研究[N];中國(guó)國(guó)防報(bào);2010年
8 記者 譚俞雄;跨界飲品引領(lǐng)生活時(shí)尚[N];中華工商時(shí)報(bào);2009年
9 本報(bào)記者 鞠靖;跨界污染,蠶先知[N];南方周末;2009年
10 夏華 依文企業(yè)集團(tuán)董事長(zhǎng);個(gè)性化+市場(chǎng)化=跨界合作的力量[N];中國(guó)服飾報(bào);2009年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 宋欣;跨界環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)制度研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2011年
2 郭亮;跨界河流水污染應(yīng)急決策支持系統(tǒng)研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年
3 林燦鈴;論跨界損害的國(guó)家責(zé)任[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2000年
4 陳昕;基于有效管理模型的環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)公眾參與有效性研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年
5 馬蒂麗;區(qū)域土地利用的戰(zhàn)略環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)[D];武漢大學(xué);2010年
6 幸潔;性別表演—后現(xiàn)代語(yǔ)境下的跨界理論與實(shí)踐[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年
7 華建偉;礦產(chǎn)資源規(guī)劃環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)的理論與實(shí)踐[D];南京大學(xué);2011年
8 王輝民;環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)中引入生態(tài)補(bǔ)償機(jī)制研究[D];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京);2008年
9 陳光建;土地利用總體規(guī)劃環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[D];中國(guó)科學(xué)院研究生院(成都生物研究所);2006年
10 周申蓓;我國(guó)跨界水資源管理協(xié)商主體研究[D];河海大學(xué);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 曹壯;土壤環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)法律制度完善研究[D];山東師范大學(xué);2011年
2 張金艷;我國(guó)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)若干制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2003年
3 楊振發(fā);建立瀾滄江—湄公河流域跨界環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)制度若干問(wèn)題的研究[D];昆明理工大學(xué);2005年
4 魏鸝;杭州地鐵工程環(huán)境影響綜合評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué);2010年
5 張順周;論跨界環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)制度[D];南昌大學(xué);2011年
6 徐庭慎;市級(jí)土地利用總體規(guī)劃環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];南京大學(xué);2011年
7 吳敬濤;論我國(guó)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)的公眾參與[D];河南大學(xué);2008年
8 曹珊;跨界環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)在核安全法律制度中的構(gòu)建[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2012年
9 張艷嬌;論我國(guó)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)制度的構(gòu)建[D];中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京);2008年
10 趙麗霞;我國(guó)環(huán)境影響評(píng)價(jià)制度研究[D];東北林業(yè)大學(xué);2005年
本文編號(hào):2143447
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/2143447.html