本文選題：國際投資協(xié)定 + 環(huán)境規(guī)則�。� 參考：《國際商務(wù)研究》2010年01期

【摘要】：為了平衡投資自由化和環(huán)境保護(hù)間沖突,早期的環(huán)境條約意圖規(guī)范加入投資規(guī)則。晚近以來,在國際投資協(xié)定中納入環(huán)境規(guī)則已經(jīng)成為新式投資協(xié)定發(fā)展的重要特色。從國際投資協(xié)定納入環(huán)境規(guī)則的立法模式看,經(jīng)歷了從投資協(xié)定到自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定的多元化發(fā)展;從立法內(nèi)容看,已經(jīng)形成從實(shí)體規(guī)范和程序規(guī)范的日趨完善的發(fā)展;從規(guī)范對(duì)象看,意圖直接規(guī)范跨國公司的傾向已經(jīng)顯露。我國的投資協(xié)定在國際背景下也產(chǎn)生了重要的變化,但是無論是國際和國內(nèi)兩個(gè)層次上都存在不足,需進(jìn)一步完善。
[Abstract]:In order to balance the conflict between investment liberalization and environmental protection, early environmental treaties were intended to regulate the inclusion of investment rules. Recently, the incorporation of environmental rules into IIAS has become an important feature of the development of new IIAS. From the point of view of the legislative model of the international investment agreement (IIA) including environmental rules, it has experienced the diversified development from the investment agreement to the free trade agreement, and from the legislative content, it has formed an increasingly perfect development from the substantive norms and procedural norms. From the normative object, the intention of direct regulation of multinational companies has been revealed. The investment agreement of our country has also produced important changes under the international background, but there are shortcomings in both international and domestic levels, which need to be further improved.
【作者單位】： 淮陰師范學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D996.4

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖芳;;《里斯本條約》與歐盟成員國國際投資保護(hù)協(xié)定的歐洲化[J];歐洲研究;2011年03期

2 羅斌;;“TRIPs-Plus”協(xié)定的法律分析及中國的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年21期

3 袁海勇;;ECFA的法律評(píng)析和若干思考[J];世界貿(mào)易組織動(dòng)態(tài)與研究;2011年04期

4 李宗輝;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》(ACTA)的“表”與“里”[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

5 胡淑慧;;臺(tái)灣FTA之夢(mèng)能否實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];世界知識(shí);2011年14期

6 何力;;TPP與中國的經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化法動(dòng)向和對(duì)策[J];政法論叢;2011年03期

7 孫建紅;;日本外交的APEC“破局”[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2068114