本文選題：鹿特丹規(guī)則 + 貨物控制權(quán)　； 參考：《華東政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：鹿特丹規(guī)則創(chuàng)設(shè)的貨物控制權(quán)制度對于海上貨物運輸具有極大的影響,控制權(quán)立法從一個新的角度闡釋了海上貨物權(quán)利的歸屬與行使規(guī)則。 本文在導言中說明了認識控制權(quán)的意義,并確定以權(quán)利的性質(zhì)和適用分析作為本文的寫作重點。 第一章中將首先從概念入手介紹公約對貨物控制權(quán)內(nèi)容的規(guī)定,明確其權(quán)利外觀上為一種單方指示,然后結(jié)合中途停運權(quán)和貨物控制權(quán)的關(guān)系介紹控制權(quán)發(fā)展歷程與其背后貿(mào)易法與運輸法的銜接要求。 第二章主要分析爭議較多的權(quán)利性質(zhì)問題,改變以往僅以某一方面特征進行貨物控制權(quán)性質(zhì)探究的方式,由該權(quán)利產(chǎn)生的背景,抓住支配這一物權(quán)的核心理念,闡述貨物控制權(quán)為物權(quán)性質(zhì),并從海運環(huán)境的特殊性解釋其和所有權(quán)的關(guān)系。 第三章主要分析FOB貿(mào)易術(shù)語下,貨物賣方如何通過成為控制方解決以往難于解決的權(quán)利主體地位問題,說明控制權(quán)主體識別模式的革新,即不再以托運人為核心而是確定單獨唯一的控制方為權(quán)利主體。 第四章將分析在公約制度背景下控制權(quán)的適用,鹿特丹規(guī)則把貨物控制權(quán)作為指示交付的基礎(chǔ),分別規(guī)定各種單證條件下的放貨方式,從而將無單放貨和它暗含的提單法則作為貨物交付的一個環(huán)節(jié)問題加以解決。 總結(jié)部分將說明鹿特丹規(guī)則以及貨物控制權(quán)制度的創(chuàng)新精神和示范法意義,
[Abstract]:The system of right of control of goods created by Rotterdam rules has great influence on the carriage of goods by sea. The legislation of right of control explains the rules of attribution and exercise of rights of goods by sea from a new angle. In the introduction, this paper explains the significance of understanding the right of control, and determines that the analysis of the nature and applicability of the right is the focus of this paper. The first chapter will introduce the content of the control of goods from the concept of the provisions of the Convention, and make it clear that the appearance of its rights is a unilateral direction. Then the relationship between the right of stoppage and the right of control of goods is combined to introduce the course of the development of the right of control and the connection requirement between the trade law and the law of transport behind it. The second chapter mainly analyzes the controversial nature of the right to change the past only with a certain aspect of the nature of control of goods to explore the nature of the way by the right to the background of the right to seize the ruling of the core concept of the real right. This paper expounds that the right of control of goods is real right, and explains its relation with ownership from the particularity of maritime environment. The third chapter mainly analyzes how the seller of goods solves the problem of the status of the rights subject which was difficult to solve in the past by becoming the controlling party under the FOB trade term, and explains the innovation of the identification pattern of the subject of control. That is to say, the shipper is no longer the core, but the sole controlling party as the subject of the right. Chapter IV will analyze the application of the right of control in the context of the Convention regime. The Rotterdam rules take the right of control of the goods as the basis for the indicated delivery, respectively, and specify the mode of delivery under various documentary conditions. The undocumented delivery of goods and its implied bill of lading law as a link in the delivery of goods to be resolved. The concluding part will explain the innovative spirit of the Rotterdam rules and the regime of control over goods and the implications of the Model Law,
【學位授予單位】：華東政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.19

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 何俊;論FOB條件下貨物控制權(quán)研究[D];大連海事大學;2012年

，

本文編號：2021409