本文選題：跨國公司社會責任 + 國際法�。� 參考：《吉林大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：自從公司經(jīng)營模式誕生,幾個世紀以來,人們對于公司運營過程之中的道德責任的探討就從未停止過。特別是工業(yè)革命后,公司憑借著對資金、人力、資源的大規(guī)模集聚,在推動科技進步、促使經(jīng)濟發(fā)展、增加就業(yè)等方面做出了極其重要的貢獻;但另一方面,由于公司對于利潤無限度的過分追求,又導致了公司不惜“越界”,無視勞動者的合法權(quán)益,肆意開采自然資源,用以換取自身利益的最大化。 隨著生產(chǎn)的專業(yè)化、社會化、乃至全球化,人類社會的經(jīng)濟關系也發(fā)生了翻天覆地的變化,而這其中最典型的莫過于跨國公司的出現(xiàn)。跨國公司迅速在全球擴張,受其影響,國際經(jīng)濟關系,包括國際貿(mào)易、國際金融等發(fā)生了極大的變化,因此跨國公司逐漸引起了人們的普遍關注。如同其他公司一樣,既然在社會中經(jīng)營存在,那么跨國公司就應當承擔起應有的社會責任。 本文以對跨國公司社會責任的國際法律規(guī)制為主題,對相關問題進行了分析探討,除文章序言以外具體內(nèi)容分為以下幾部分: 第一部分概括介紹了跨國公司社會責任的相關問題,包括公司社會責任的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展概況,跨國公司的概念及特征,在此基礎之上總結(jié)了跨國公司社會責任的特征,得出結(jié)論,跨國公司社會責任除了具備一般公司社會責任的特征之外,還具有自身獨特的屬性。 第二部分圍繞跨國公司社會責任的核心內(nèi)容展開,對于目前國際上討論最集中的四個問題,即跨國公司的勞工保護責任、跨國公司的人權(quán)保護責任、跨國公司的環(huán)境保護責任、以及跨國公司的反腐敗責任,分別進行了分析和論述。 第三部分和第四部分是文章的核心內(nèi)容,其中第三部分從整體上分析了跨國公司社會責任法律規(guī)制的基礎之上,著重對現(xiàn)行的跨國公司國際法律規(guī)制進行了分析,除了從跨國公司社會責任國際法律規(guī)制整體架構(gòu)的角度進行論述之外,還著重對于ISO26000進行了分析。第四部分則是對未來跨國公司社會責任國際法規(guī)制的前景進行評析,對于國際“硬法”在規(guī)制跨國公司社會責任方面未來所能發(fā)揮的作用給出肯定的答案,之后重點論證了國際“軟法”在規(guī)制跨國公司社會責任方面所具有的發(fā)展空間。 最后在文章結(jié)尾中,給出本文的結(jié)論:通過法律的途徑規(guī)制跨國公司社會責任,無論是東道國國內(nèi)法、跨國公司母國的國內(nèi)法、以及跨國公司自我約束機制都具有著很大的限制性,與其相比較,對跨國公司社會責任選擇從實施國際法規(guī)制的角度入手,無論是從理論還是從實際的角度目前來看都是較為恰當合理的。因此無論是現(xiàn)在還是未來我們都要繼續(xù)努力推動相關國際條約等“國際硬法”的不斷發(fā)展,同時我們要在規(guī)制跨國公司社會責任的“國際軟法”領域?qū)で笸黄?探索新的能夠有效解決問題的方法。
[Abstract]:Since the birth of the corporate business model, the discussion of moral responsibility in the process of corporate operation has never stopped for centuries. Especially after the industrial revolution, companies have made extremely important contributions to promoting scientific and technological progress, promoting economic development, increasing employment, and so on, depending on the large-scale agglomeration of funds, human resources and resources; on the other hand, Because of the excessive pursuit of unlimited profits, the company does not hesitate to "cross the border", ignore the legitimate rights and interests of workers, exploit natural resources wantonly, and use it to maximize its own interests. With the specialization of production, socialization and even globalization, the economic relationship of human society has also undergone earth-shaking changes, and the most typical of which is the emergence of multinational corporations. The transnational corporation expands rapidly in the world, by its influence, the international economic relations, including the international trade, the international finance and so on has taken place the great change, therefore the transnational corporation has gradually aroused people's widespread concern. Like other companies, transnational corporations should assume their due social responsibility since they exist in society. Based on the international legal regulation of transnational corporations' social responsibility, this paper analyzes and discusses the related issues. Besides the preface of the article, the content is divided into the following parts: the first part introduces the related problems of transnational corporations' social responsibility, including the general situation of the emergence and development of corporate social responsibility, the concept and characteristics of transnational corporations. On this basis, this paper summarizes the characteristics of MNCs' social responsibility, and concludes that MNCs' social responsibility not only has the characteristics of general corporate social responsibility, but also has its own unique attributes. The second part focuses on the core content of the social responsibility of transnational corporations. It focuses on the four issues that have been discussed in the world at present, namely, the duty of labor protection of transnational corporations, the responsibility of human rights protection of transnational corporations, and the responsibility of environmental protection of transnational corporations. As well as the transnational corporation's anti-corruption responsibility, has carried on the analysis and the elaboration separately. The third part and the fourth part are the core contents of the article. The third part analyzes the legal regulation of transnational corporations' social responsibility on the basis of the whole, and focuses on the analysis of the current international legal regulation of transnational corporations. In addition to discussing the whole framework of international legal regulation of transnational corporations' social responsibility, ISO26000 is analyzed emphatically. The fourth part is to analyze the prospect of international regulation of transnational corporations' social responsibility in the future, and give a definite answer to the future role of international "hard law" in regulating transnational corporations' social responsibility. After that, it demonstrates the development space of international soft law in regulating the social responsibility of multinational corporations. Finally, in the end of the article, the conclusion of this paper is given: regulating the social responsibility of transnational corporations by means of law, whether it is the domestic law of the host country or the domestic law of the home country of the multinational corporation. Compared with the self-restraint mechanism of transnational corporations, the choice of transnational corporations' social responsibility starts from the angle of implementing international law. Whether from the theory or from the practical point of view is more appropriate and reasonable. Therefore, we should continue to promote the continuous development of "international hard law", such as relevant international treaties, both now and in the future. At the same time, we will seek a breakthrough in the field of "international soft law", which regulates the social responsibility of transnational corporations. Explore new ways to solve problems effectively.
【學位授予單位】：吉林大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D99

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 賈琳;;現(xiàn)行跨國公司之法律管制缺陷評析[J];北方法學;2007年04期

2 王邱璐;;淺析跨國公司的法律責任[J];法商論叢;2007年01期

3 歷詠;;跨國公司社會責任規(guī)范的自愿性困境[J];法學;2006年06期

4 段海英;;跨國公司承擔社會責任的路徑分析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬刊);2009年01期

5 于文婕;;論跨國公司之法律主體地位[J];河北法學;2009年03期

6 曾麗潔;;企業(yè)社會責任跨國訴訟的理論與實踐探討[J];湖北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年03期

7 黃志雄;;企業(yè)社會責任的國際法問題研究[J];武大國際法評論;2009年01期

8 李雪平;;企業(yè)社會責任國際標準的性質(zhì)和效力——兼議ISO26000制定中的法律問題[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2007年04期

9 袁文全;;論跨國公司社會責任的母國規(guī)制[J];西南民族大學學報(人文社科版);2010年01期

10 陳偉昌;;企業(yè)社會責任相關國際標準的影響——SA8000與ISO26000之比較[J];行政與法;2011年06期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 龍云安;跨國公司社會責任研究[D];四川大學;2007年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 王希之;跨國公司社會責任的國際法律規(guī)制[D];廈門大學;2007年

2 周太東;國際法視角下的跨國公司社會責任[D];中國政法大學;2008年

，

本文編號：2014904