本文選題：實(shí)施動(dòng)植物衛(wèi)生檢疫措施 + SPS協(xié)定��； 參考：《遼寧大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著人們生活水平的提高，食品安全與健康問(wèn)題越來(lái)越引起社會(huì)的關(guān)注，成為國(guó)家與政府調(diào)控的重點(diǎn)，，在國(guó)際層面的表現(xiàn)即為各國(guó)紛紛采取動(dòng)植物衛(wèi)生檢疫措施，試圖將風(fēng)險(xiǎn)阻卻在國(guó)門(mén)之外，但由此產(chǎn)生的貿(mào)易摩擦也同樣阻礙了國(guó)際貿(mào)易的發(fā)展。作為調(diào)整衛(wèi)生安全與國(guó)際貿(mào)易矛盾的專門(mén)的國(guó)際協(xié)定，《實(shí)施動(dòng)植物衛(wèi)生檢疫措施協(xié)定》在這方面的作用不容小覷。 本文在充分認(rèn)識(shí)到該協(xié)定在當(dāng)前形勢(shì)下重大意義的基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)該協(xié)定的核心條款第5條展開(kāi)分析研究，文章的第二部分對(duì)第5條各條款的法律分析作為通篇的重點(diǎn)，對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估原則、適當(dāng)保護(hù)水平及風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)防原則進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的講解，并總結(jié)出適用規(guī)則，通過(guò)對(duì)中英文條文的分解解讀，把握第5條各條款的設(shè)定目的及意義，掌握其所反映的規(guī)則要求，并對(duì)爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)專家組及上訴機(jī)構(gòu)在涉及動(dòng)植物衛(wèi)生檢疫領(lǐng)域案例中的報(bào)告進(jìn)行解析，以掌握國(guó)際司法機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)第5條的態(tài)度及該條款的運(yùn)用規(guī)則，從而為我國(guó)的國(guó)內(nèi)安全及國(guó)際貿(mào)易的發(fā)展提供法理基礎(chǔ)；同時(shí)，本文還注意跟蹤了該協(xié)定第5條的最新發(fā)展，補(bǔ)充完善了第5條的法條理解，及時(shí)掌握國(guó)際社會(huì)對(duì)該協(xié)定的動(dòng)態(tài)，另外，還對(duì)上訴機(jī)構(gòu)在判例中的重要結(jié)論進(jìn)行了評(píng)價(jià)，以期不足之處在未來(lái)能得到改善；本文的最后一部分詳細(xì)介紹了國(guó)際社會(huì)對(duì)《實(shí)施動(dòng)植物衛(wèi)生檢疫措施協(xié)定》的重視，特別是典型國(guó)家對(duì)第5條核心條款的注重與應(yīng)用，其中對(duì)歐盟側(cè)重于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)防、美國(guó)側(cè)重于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估及科學(xué)證據(jù)的表現(xiàn)進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的列舉，并對(duì)《實(shí)施動(dòng)植物衛(wèi)生檢疫措施協(xié)定》第5條的內(nèi)容與《北美自由貿(mào)易協(xié)定》在衛(wèi)生檢疫領(lǐng)域的規(guī)定的高度吻合性進(jìn)行了比對(duì)，最后將文章的落腳點(diǎn)回歸到我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)，在肯定我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)有關(guān)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估制度、國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)防等內(nèi)容的現(xiàn)有法律先進(jìn)性的同時(shí)，指出其在法律地位及規(guī)定可操作性上的不足，并提出改進(jìn)意見(jiàn)，以促進(jìn)我國(guó)保護(hù)國(guó)內(nèi)動(dòng)植物生命健康能力的提高，促進(jìn)我國(guó)對(duì)外貿(mào)易的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the improvement of people's living standards, food safety and health issues have attracted more and more attention of the society and become the focus of national and government regulation and control. In the international level, many countries have adopted sanitary and phytosanitary measures. Trying to keep risks out of the country, but the resulting trade friction also hinders the development of international trade. As a special international agreement which adjusts the contradiction between health safety and international trade, the role of the Agreement on the implementation of Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures in this respect cannot be underestimated. This paper, on the basis of fully recognizing the great significance of the Agreement under the present situation, The second part of the article focuses on the legal analysis of each article of Article 5 as the focus of the whole article, and explains in detail the principles of risk assessment, appropriate level of protection and the principle of risk prevention. And summed up the applicable rules, through the analysis of the Chinese and English articles, grasp the purpose and significance of the provisions of Article 5, grasp the rules reflected by the requirements, And to parse the reports of panels of dispute settlement bodies and appellate bodies in cases involving the field of animal and plant health and quarantine in order to grasp the attitude of international judicial bodies towards article 5 and the rules governing its application, This provides a legal basis for the development of domestic security and international trade in China. At the same time, this paper also pays attention to the latest development of Article 5 of the Agreement and complements the understanding of Article 5. (B) to keep abreast of developments in the international community with regard to the Agreement and, in addition, to evaluate the important conclusions of the appellate body in its jurisprudence, with a view to improving the deficiencies in the future; In the last part of this paper, the emphasis of the international community on the implementation of the Agreement on Phytosanitary and Phytosanitary measures is introduced in detail, especially the emphasis and application of the core provisions of Article 5 in typical countries, in which the EU focuses on risk prevention. The United States focuses on risk assessment and the performance of scientific evidence for detailed enumeration, In addition, the contents of Article 5 of the Agreement on the implementation of Sanitary and Quarantine measures are compared with the highly consistent provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement in the field of health and quarantine. Finally, the foothold of the article is returned to our country. While affirming the existing legal advancement of China's domestic risk assessment system, international standards, risk prevention, and so on, this paper points out the deficiencies in the legal status and operability of the regulations, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. In order to promote China's ability to protect the life and health of domestic animals and plants, promote the development of China's foreign trade.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳立虎;論風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)警原則在WTO法律中的地位[J];比較法研究;2005年04期

2 高曉露;孫界麗;;論風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)防原則的適用要件——以國(guó)際環(huán)境法為背景[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年02期

3 何易;歐洲法院和WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)構(gòu)處理貿(mào)易與環(huán)境案件法律之比較[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年02期

4 龔向前;;WTO框架下風(fēng)險(xiǎn)規(guī)制的合法性裁量[J];法學(xué)家;2010年04期

5 李壽平;略論歐洲聯(lián)盟的環(huán)境與貿(mào)易政策及其啟示[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年03期

6 鄧寧;;北美自由貿(mào)易區(qū)動(dòng)植物檢疫措施制度研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年01期

7 劉漢鵬,趙航;GATT1994第20條中的引言及(b)(g)款的解釋[J];國(guó)際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期

8 陳立虎;以科學(xué)證據(jù)為基礎(chǔ)——探析《SPS協(xié)定》的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估規(guī)則[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2004年05期

9 韓永紅;;論預(yù)防原則在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中存在與發(fā)展的合理性——源于對(duì)“二甘醇牙膏”事件的思考[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2008年03期

10 董銀果;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易中SPS典型案例的關(guān)鍵爭(zhēng)議點(diǎn)分析——兼論對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2010年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 荊珍;;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)防原則在WTO法中的體現(xiàn)及適用[A];生態(tài)文明與環(huán)境資源法--2009年全國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集[C];2009年

2 秦天寶;陳萍;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易中風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)防原則的適用問(wèn)題研究:結(jié)合WTO/SPS協(xié)定及案例的考察[A];中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會(huì)二○○七年年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

本文編號(hào)：2001769