本文選題：地理標(biāo)志 + 商標(biāo)　； 參考：《揚州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國有著豐富的地理標(biāo)志資源,在與發(fā)達(dá)國家的競爭中,地理標(biāo)志資源因其本身潛藏著巨大的經(jīng)濟價值,將越來越成為我國的優(yōu)勢項目,為增強我國的軟實力發(fā)揮重要作用。因此,保護(hù)好地理標(biāo)志具有極其重要的法學(xué)理論意義和社會實踐價值。我國對地理標(biāo)志的保護(hù)起步較晚,現(xiàn)行立法對地理標(biāo)志的保護(hù)主要是通過質(zhì)檢和工商兩個部門管理,采取兩種行政機構(gòu)分別管理和保護(hù)的法律保護(hù)模式。地理標(biāo)志既可以根據(jù)《商標(biāo)法》注冊集體商標(biāo)或證明商標(biāo)獲得商標(biāo)專有權(quán),也可以依據(jù)《地理標(biāo)志產(chǎn)品保護(hù)規(guī)定》申請獲得地理標(biāo)志權(quán)。但是,由此會導(dǎo)致在同一地理名稱上同時存在商標(biāo)權(quán)和地理標(biāo)志權(quán)。實踐中,類似案件屢有發(fā)生,爭議較大。本文通過分析研究,重新構(gòu)造地理標(biāo)志的保護(hù)體系,解決與商標(biāo)權(quán)的矛盾,使地理標(biāo)志得到更為合理和有效的保護(hù)。 第一部分：地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)的概念界定。該部分對地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)的概念進(jìn)行了界定,介紹了地理標(biāo)志在不同的歷史時期的不同名稱,論述了地理標(biāo)志的產(chǎn)生與不斷發(fā)展的演化過程。在對商標(biāo)的概念界定中,指出了商標(biāo)主要可以通過三種途徑取得：注冊取得、使用取得和具有了某種聲譽而取得；除了普通商標(biāo)外,為了更好地解決地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)的沖突,還論述了幾種特殊的商標(biāo)類型,包括集體商標(biāo)、證明商標(biāo)和地名商標(biāo)。此外,該部分還對地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)的聯(lián)系與區(qū)別進(jìn)行了比較分析。 第二部分：地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的表現(xiàn)形式、原因及地理標(biāo)志在使用中存在的問題。本部分通過對地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的分析研究,指出了地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的表現(xiàn)形式有哪些,進(jìn)而分析導(dǎo)致兩者沖突的原因。通過對兩者沖突的表現(xiàn)形式和原因的綜合分析,我們可以認(rèn)識到問題的根源在哪,進(jìn)而可以對癥下藥,解決問題。此外,由于地理標(biāo)志的使用再實踐中存在諸多問題,加劇了地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)的沖突,因此,將此部分單獨列出來,為地理標(biāo)志體系的構(gòu)建提供一些思路。 第三部分：國外地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)權(quán)的沖突解決比較。該部分分為兩個方面,一是國際條約的相關(guān)規(guī)定,二是其他國家對地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的解決方式。地理標(biāo)志在我國的起步較晚,但在世界上其他國家如法國等發(fā)展相對較為完善,在該部分闡述了國際條約對地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的相關(guān)規(guī)定和部分國家對兩者沖突的處理,通過對其他國家和地區(qū)做法的分析和比較研究,綜合考慮我國的國情,為我國的地理標(biāo)志保護(hù)所借鑒。 第四部分：我國地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的解決。本部分主要是解決文章提出的問題,主要從以下幾個方面著手：首先,確立解決地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的一般原則,主要從宏觀上指導(dǎo)地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的解決；其次,完善相關(guān)的法律制度,地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)沖突的原因之一就是法律制度本身存在沖突,因此,完善法律制度可以避免一部分地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)的沖突。第三,重構(gòu)我國地理標(biāo)志的保護(hù)體系,隨著經(jīng)濟的不斷發(fā)展,我國對地理標(biāo)志重要性的認(rèn)識也在不斷加深,重構(gòu)地理標(biāo)志保護(hù)體系是更好地保護(hù)地理標(biāo)志的是一個重要組成部分。最后,地理標(biāo)志的國際保護(hù)也具有重要意義,我們不僅要解決國內(nèi)的地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)的沖突,更需要積極參與國際談判,加強對地理標(biāo)志的國際保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:China has a rich geographical indication resources. In the competition with the developed countries, the geographical indication resources, because of their latent economic value, will become the dominant items in our country and play an important role in strengthening the soft power of our country. Therefore, it is of great importance to protect the geographical signs and the social reality. The protection of geographical indications is late in our country. The protection of geographical indications in the current legislation is mainly through the management of the two departments of quality inspection and industry and commerce, and the legal protection mode of the two kinds of administrative agencies are taken and protected respectively. The geographical indications can not only obtain the exclusive right of trademark according to the Trademark Law > the registered trademark or the certificate trademark. It can also apply for the right to obtain geographical indications according to the provisions of the "product protection of geographical indications". However, it will lead to the existence of trademark rights and geographical indications right on the same geographical name. In practice, similar cases occur frequently and have great disputes. This paper, through analysis and research, reconstructs the protection system of geographical indications and solves the spear of trademark rights. Shield enables geographical indications to be protected more reasonably and effectively.
The first part is the definition of the concept of geographical indications and trademarks. This part defines the concept of geographical indications and trademarks, introduces the different names of geographical indications in different historical periods, expounds the generation and evolution process of geographical indications, and points out that the trademark is mainly through three in the definition of the concept of trademark. In addition to the common trademark, in addition to the common trademark, in order to better solve the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks, some special types of trademark, including the collective trademark, the trademark and the place name trademark, are also discussed. Do not make a comparative analysis.
The second part: the manifestations of the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks, the reasons and the problems in the use of geographical indications. Through the analysis of the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks, this part points out the manifestations of the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks, and then analyzes the causes of the conflict. In the comprehensive analysis of the form and cause, we can realize where the root of the problem is, and then can solve the problem. In addition, there are many problems in the use of geographical indications in practice, which aggravates the conflict between geographical indications and trademark. Therefore, this part is listed alone to provide some ideas for the construction of geographical indication system. Road.
The third part: the comparison of the conflict between foreign geographical indications and trademark rights. This part is divided into two aspects, one is the relevant provisions of international treaties, and the two is the solution to the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks in other countries. The geographical indications are late in China, but in the world, the development of his country, such as France, is relatively perfect, This part expounds the relevant provisions of the international treaties on the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks and the handling of the conflict between the two countries. Through the analysis and comparative study of the practice of other countries and regions, the national conditions of our country are taken into consideration and the reference for the protection of the geographical indications of our country.
The fourth part: the solution of the conflict between China's geographical indications and trademark. This part is mainly to solve the problems raised in the article, mainly from the following aspects: first, to establish the general principles to solve the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks, and to guide the solution of the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks from the macro level; secondly, to improve the relevant legal system. One of the reasons for the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks is the conflict between the legal system itself. Therefore, the improvement of the legal system can avoid a part of the conflict between geographical indications and trademarks. Third, to reconstruct the protection system of the geographical indications of our country, with the continuous development of the economy, our understanding of the importance of geographical indications is deepening and reconstructing. In the end, the international protection of geographical indications is also of great significance. We should not only solve the conflict between domestic geographical indications and trademarks, but also need to actively participate in international negotiations and strengthen the international protection of geographical indications.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：揚州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D997.1;D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張偉君;地名商標(biāo)與地理標(biāo)志沖突的法律調(diào)整[J];中華商標(biāo);2002年07期

2 陳輝,劉瑜;地名商標(biāo)的“弱保護(hù)性”與“合理使用”[J];中華商標(biāo);2003年07期

3 王笑冰;印度對地理標(biāo)志的保護(hù)[J];中華商標(biāo);2004年04期

4 王笑冰;;歐盟對地理標(biāo)志的保護(hù)[J];中華商標(biāo);2005年12期

5 王笑冰;;瑞士對地理標(biāo)志的法律保護(hù)[J];中華商標(biāo);2006年03期

6 胡政武;蘇曉軍;;論地名商標(biāo)特性及合理使用制度的法律思考[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2006年04期

7 陳金濤;析TRIPS協(xié)議與我國地理標(biāo)志的法律保護(hù)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年04期

8 劉亞軍;完善我國地理標(biāo)志法律保護(hù)實證分析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年02期

9 孫昊亮,鄭艷馨;論地名的私權(quán)化[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2004年11期

10 王笑冰;;時間在先，權(quán)利在先?——論地理標(biāo)志與商標(biāo)的沖突及其解決途徑[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馮琳;地名商標(biāo)與地理標(biāo)志的沖突與解決[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1970697