本文選題：引渡 + 國(guó)際反恐　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)的國(guó)際恐怖主義犯罪日益成為危及國(guó)際和平與安全的主要障礙，恐怖主義犯罪逐漸發(fā)展為一個(gè)全球性的難題,已經(jīng)成為威脅人類(lèi)生存與安全的重要內(nèi)容。要打擊國(guó)際恐怖主義犯罪，，引渡制度是必須要涉及到的一項(xiàng)制度�？植乐髁x犯罪分子借助先進(jìn)的科學(xué)技術(shù)手段，較之以往更容易在全球范圍內(nèi)實(shí)施恐怖犯罪，也更加容易逃離犯罪發(fā)生地，更容易利用不同國(guó)家之間引渡制度上的障礙逃避刑事責(zé)任的追究。因此，引渡這一重要的制度對(duì)打擊國(guó)際恐怖主義的重要性自然是不言而喻的。由于受到“政治犯不引渡”等原則的限制，跨國(guó)打擊恐怖主義犯罪的難度日益增大。因此，針對(duì)打擊國(guó)際恐怖主義犯罪的討論,從法律角度來(lái)看主要集中在引渡問(wèn)題上。全文的主要研究?jī)?nèi)容分為三個(gè)部分，首先是引渡在國(guó)際反恐合作中適用現(xiàn)狀，在對(duì)引渡的一般法律制度介紹的基礎(chǔ)上，重點(diǎn)分析了國(guó)際反恐合作中關(guān)于引渡恐怖主義罪犯的兩個(gè)原則，即或起訴或引渡原則和政治犯不引渡原則。然后總結(jié)了引渡在國(guó)際反恐合作中適用存在的問(wèn)題，首先認(rèn)為兩個(gè)核心原則對(duì)國(guó)際恐怖犯罪分子引渡的限制，包括政治犯不引渡原則理解上存在的問(wèn)題，或起訴或引渡原則在執(zhí)行上的困難，有重點(diǎn)分析了國(guó)家間達(dá)成雙邊反恐引渡協(xié)議的困難。最后提出了國(guó)際反恐合作中引渡制度的完善對(duì)策，這是本文的重點(diǎn)，也是難點(diǎn)。文章認(rèn)為，完善雙邊反恐引渡合作的實(shí)體性規(guī)定，特別是關(guān)于政治犯不引渡問(wèn)題和關(guān)于引渡協(xié)議問(wèn)題，同時(shí)要完善恐怖主義犯罪的程序性規(guī)定，并加緊制訂有關(guān)國(guó)際反恐引渡制度的多邊統(tǒng)一公約。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the crime of international terrorism has increasingly become the main obstacle that endangers international peace and security. The crime of terrorism has gradually developed into a global problem and has become an important content threatening the survival and security of mankind. In order to combat the crime of international terrorism, extradition system is a system that must be involved. With the help of advanced scientific and technological means, terrorist criminals are more likely to commit terrorist crimes on a global scale than in the past, and they are also more likely to escape from the place where the crime took place. It is easier to use obstacles in extradition systems between different countries to avoid criminal liability. Thus, the importance of extradition as an important regime in combating international terrorism is self-evident. Due to the restriction of the principle of "political prisoners do not extradite", it is increasingly difficult to fight against terrorism. Therefore, the discussion on combating the crime of international terrorism mainly focuses on extradition from a legal point of view. The main research content of this paper is divided into three parts. Firstly, extradition is applied in the international anti-terrorism cooperation. On the basis of introducing the general legal system of extradition, This paper focuses on the two principles of international anti-terrorism cooperation on the extradition of terrorist criminals, the principle of even prosecution or extradition and the principle of non-extradition of political prisoners. Then it summarizes the problems existing in the application of extradition in international anti-terrorism cooperation. Firstly, it considers that the two core principles restrict the extradition of international terrorist criminals, including the problems existing in the understanding of the principle of non-extradition of political prisoners. Or the difficulties in the implementation of the principle of prosecution or extradition, with emphasis on the difficulty of concluding bilateral agreements on extradition against terrorism among countries. Finally, the author puts forward the perfect countermeasures of extradition system in international anti-terrorism cooperation, which is the focus and difficulty of this paper. The article holds that it is necessary to perfect the substantive provisions on bilateral cooperation in anti-terrorism extradition, especially on the question of non-extradition of political prisoners and extradition agreements, and at the same time to perfect the procedural provisions on terrorist crimes. And to step up the formulation of international anti-terrorism extradition system of the multilateral unified convention.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃風(fēng);;國(guó)際引渡合作規(guī)則的新發(fā)展[J];比較法研究;2006年03期

2 黃澗秋;;論國(guó)際刑法中的“或引渡或起訴”原則[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年01期

3 張琰妍;;引渡制度重思[J];中國(guó)司法;2006年03期

4 周洪鈞,石育斌;完善《中華人民共和國(guó)引渡法》的若干思考[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年03期

5 夏勇,王焰;我國(guó)學(xué)界對(duì)恐怖主義犯罪定義研究的綜述[J];法商研究;2004年01期

6 張乃根;試析《國(guó)家責(zé)任條款》的“國(guó)際不法行為”[J];法學(xué)家;2007年03期

7 劉凌梅;國(guó)際反恐怖犯罪與我國(guó)刑事立法[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年02期

8 王秀梅;;懲治恐怖主義犯罪中維護(hù)公共秩序與尊重人權(quán)的平衡[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年02期

9 王立民;完善反恐立法 有效打擊恐怖主義犯罪[J];法學(xué);2003年06期

10 周露露;歐盟引渡制度的新發(fā)展及對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示[J];法學(xué);2003年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 馬呈元;國(guó)際犯罪及其責(zé)任[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2001年

2 趙建文;國(guó)際法上的國(guó)家責(zé)任[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

3 李文沛;國(guó)際海洋法之海盜問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 疏震婭;論普遍管轄原則與國(guó)家主權(quán)的關(guān)系[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

2 周麗;國(guó)際法上的政治犯罪不引渡原則研究[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

3 邵君;試析海上反恐的國(guó)際合作模式[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

4 崔魯靜;論妨害海上航行安全不法行為的相關(guān)國(guó)際法制度[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

5 崔萌;試論國(guó)際人道法的基本原則[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

6 周文彪;冷戰(zhàn)后馬六甲海峽的海盜問(wèn)題研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1959275