本文選題：安全港規(guī)則 + 法律分析　； 參考：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著計(jì)算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的不斷普及，人類越來越感受到信息時(shí)代的魅力。與此同時(shí)，，迅猛的數(shù)字傳播技術(shù)給版權(quán)保護(hù)帶來了巨大的沖擊，很多國(guó)家通過修改版權(quán)法律制度或者制定專門規(guī)定，加強(qiáng)了對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境下版權(quán)人的保護(hù)。雖然對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)是對(duì)權(quán)利人智力勞動(dòng)成果的尊重，加大知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)力度會(huì)推動(dòng)社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展，但是基于商業(yè)利益的主導(dǎo)，在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的某些領(lǐng)域，已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)過度的現(xiàn)象，在信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的保護(hù)領(lǐng)域尤為嚴(yán)重。安全港規(guī)則的出臺(tái)將眾多的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商從訴訟的漩渦中拯救了出來。 在世界范圍內(nèi)，歐盟和美國(guó)的相關(guān)法律法規(guī)對(duì)于安全港規(guī)則的實(shí)踐處于領(lǐng)先地位。歐盟的《電子商務(wù)令》為網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供商提供了統(tǒng)一明確的執(zhí)行標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，便于進(jìn)行操作。美國(guó)的《數(shù)字千年版權(quán)法》中明確確立了安全港規(guī)則，它最早將安全港規(guī)則納入了法律，規(guī)定內(nèi)容也比較全面，為信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)的糾紛提供了審理的法律依據(jù)。 利用規(guī)范分析法，將安全港規(guī)則的適用剖析分為四個(gè)方面，分別從主體要件、客體要件、主觀方面、客觀方面進(jìn)行分析闡述。并且，結(jié)合相關(guān)案例進(jìn)行了從理論到實(shí)踐的論證，將國(guó)際上與我國(guó)的立法實(shí)踐進(jìn)行對(duì)照，對(duì)安全港規(guī)則進(jìn)行了全方位的剖析。 通過對(duì)安全港規(guī)則適用的解析，不難發(fā)現(xiàn)目前在國(guó)際上對(duì)此規(guī)則的操作仍然存在諸多問題。由此可見，實(shí)現(xiàn)安全港規(guī)則背后網(wǎng)絡(luò)中介服務(wù)商、版權(quán)人以及接受中介服務(wù)的用戶三方利益均衡是目前的重要目標(biāo)。我國(guó)立法中的有關(guān)規(guī)定也存在諸多弊端需要完善和解決。因此，借鑒國(guó)際的一些立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)，對(duì)我國(guó)的版權(quán)保護(hù)領(lǐng)域提出立法建議是十分必要的。
[Abstract]:With the popularization of computer network, people feel the charm of the information age more and more. At the same time, the rapid digital communication technology has brought a huge impact to copyright protection. Many countries have strengthened the protection of copyright owners under the network environment by modifying the copyright legal system or formulating special regulations. Although the protection of intellectual property rights is a respect for the intellectual labor achievements of the right holders, increasing the protection of intellectual property rights will promote social and economic development, but based on the dominance of commercial interests, in some areas of intellectual property rights, There has been the phenomenon of excessive protection of intellectual property rights, especially in the field of information network transmission right protection. The introduction of safe harbour rules will numerous network service providers from the whirlpool of litigation out of the rescue. Worldwide, the European Union and the United States have a leading role in the practice of safe harbour rules. The European Union's e-commerce order provides uniform and clear enforcement standards for internet service providers. The "Digital Millennium copyright Law" of the United States clearly established the rule of safe harbour. It first incorporated the rule of safe harbour into the law, and the content of the regulation was also relatively comprehensive, which provided the legal basis for the dispute of the protection of the right of information dissemination on the network. By means of normative analysis, the application and analysis of safe harbour regulations are divided into four aspects, which are the subjective elements, the object elements, the subjective aspects and the objective aspects. Combined with relevant cases, this paper demonstrates from theory to practice, compares the international legislation practice with our country's legislative practice, and analyzes the safe harbour rules in all directions. It is not difficult to find that there are still many problems in the international operation of the safe Harbor Code through the analysis of its application. It can be seen that it is an important goal to balance the interests of network intermediary service providers, copyright owners and users receiving intermediary services. There are many disadvantages in the legislation of our country. Therefore, it is very necessary to draw lessons from some international legislative experiences and put forward legislative suggestions in the field of copyright protection in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉波林;;關(guān)于《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》的幾點(diǎn)感悟[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年08期

2 薛虹;再論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的版權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];科技與法律;2000年01期

本文編號(hào)：1943465