本文選題：公共道德 + 自由貿易��； 參考：《湖南師范大學社會科學學報》2010年01期

【摘要】：作為"公共道德例外"條款,GATT第20條第1款雖早已允許各國采取"必要的保護公共道德"的貿易限制措施,然而內涵與外延均含混不清的"公共道德概念"在這一框架內卻持續(xù)了數(shù)十載之久。其后,WTO對美國賭博案的裁定為"公共道德例外條款"的發(fā)展做出了突破性的貢獻,上訴機構首次對該條款作了一些闡釋,但仍舊沒有厘清"公共道德"的內涵和外延問題。通過圍繞這些問題進行思考,研究提出公共道德概念的內涵和外延應分別朝著"國際化"和"廣義的"方向謹慎地發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:As a "public morals exception" clause, although Article XX, paragraph 1, of GATT has long allowed States to adopt "necessary trade restrictions for the protection of public morals", However, the concept of public morality, which is ambiguous in connotation and extension, has lasted for decades. The WTO ruling on American gambling case has made a breakthrough contribution to the development of the "Public morality exception clause". The appellate body has explained this clause for the first time, but still has not clarified the connotation and extension of "Public morality". Through thinking around these problems, the paper puts forward that the connotation and extension of the concept of public morality should develop cautiously in the direction of "internationalization" and "broad sense" respectively.
【作者單位】： 湖南師范大學法學院;長沙理工大學文法學院;
【基金】：司法部課題“國際貿易與人權保護法律問題研究”(07SFB2048)
【分類號】：D996.1

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇雪芹;對人權問題的哲學思考[J];青海民族學院學報(社會科學版);1994年04期

2 唐天日;評兩種不同的人權觀[J];w，

本文編號：1899372