本文選題：公共道德 + 自由貿(mào)易　； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)》2010年01期

【摘要】：作為"公共道德例外"條款,GATT第20條第1款雖早已允許各國(guó)采取"必要的保護(hù)公共道德"的貿(mào)易限制措施,然而內(nèi)涵與外延均含混不清的"公共道德概念"在這一框架內(nèi)卻持續(xù)了數(shù)十載之久。其后,WTO對(duì)美國(guó)賭博案的裁定為"公共道德例外條款"的發(fā)展做出了突破性的貢獻(xiàn),上訴機(jī)構(gòu)首次對(duì)該條款作了一些闡釋,但仍舊沒有厘清"公共道德"的內(nèi)涵和外延問題。通過圍繞這些問題進(jìn)行思考,研究提出公共道德概念的內(nèi)涵和外延應(yīng)分別朝著"國(guó)際化"和"廣義的"方向謹(jǐn)慎地發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:As a "public morals exception" clause, although Article XX, paragraph 1, of GATT has long allowed States to adopt "necessary trade restrictions for the protection of public morals", However, the concept of public morality, which is ambiguous in connotation and extension, has lasted for decades. The WTO ruling on American gambling case has made a breakthrough contribution to the development of the "Public morality exception clause". The appellate body has explained this clause for the first time, but still has not clarified the connotation and extension of "Public morality". Through thinking around these problems, the paper puts forward that the connotation and extension of the concept of public morality should develop cautiously in the direction of "internationalization" and "broad sense" respectively.
【作者單位】： 湖南師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)文法學(xué)院;
【基金】：司法部課題“國(guó)際貿(mào)易與人權(quán)保護(hù)法律問題研究”(07SFB2048)
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇雪芹;對(duì)人權(quán)問題的哲學(xué)思考[J];青海民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年04期

2 唐天日;評(píng)兩種不同的人權(quán)觀[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：1899372