本文選題：釣魚島 + 領(lǐng)土主權(quán)�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：中日兩國對于釣魚島主權(quán)的歸屬問題,近代以來一直在爭論,是近代以來影響中日兩國關(guān)系的一個(gè)非常重要的的問題。一直以來,釣魚島都是影響中日關(guān)系的一個(gè)十分復(fù)雜的問題,這個(gè)問題不僅涉及到中國的國家主權(quán),領(lǐng)土完整,而且也涉及歷史及法律方面的各種問題,因此一直以來都受到各方面的關(guān)注。因此深入探討中日雙方在解決釣魚島問題及東海大陸架劃界上的立場及解決方式,對于緩和中日雙方之間的矛盾以及維護(hù)自己的合法權(quán)益,都有十分重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。 自古以來,釣魚島就是中國的領(lǐng)土,這是毋庸置疑的,然而,近代以來,日本一直挖空心思的奪我釣魚島,并采取一系列的行動(dòng)以霸占釣魚島,這些都是應(yīng)該引起我們足夠重視并應(yīng)該努力區(qū)解決的一些問題。 在內(nèi)容上,本文首先介紹了釣魚島問題的由來和爭議概要,日本方面主張釣魚島一直以來都是無主地,同本對其是進(jìn)行了無主地先占而取得領(lǐng)土主權(quán)；而中國則分別從三個(gè)角度論證了釣魚島自古以來就屬于中國的領(lǐng)土。然后再從國際法的角度分析釣魚島的領(lǐng)土主權(quán)歸屬。東海是我國大陸東岸與日本海之間的半封閉海,東海大陸架蘊(yùn)藏著豐富的資源,開采便利,加之有重要的軍事價(jià)值,中日兩國對這些領(lǐng)域的歸屬及劃分,產(chǎn)生了很大的爭議。釣魚島的領(lǐng)土主權(quán)到底歸屬于誰,兩國一直爭論不休,但是一直以來卻也沒有得到解決。中同兩國在東海劃界這個(gè)問題上是存在著很大的分歧的,分歧主要集中在兩個(gè)方面,一是關(guān)于東海大陸架的劃界原則,二是關(guān)于釣魚島及沖繩海槽在大陸架劃界中的地位。在劃界原則問題上,同本認(rèn)為使用中間線原則是合適的方法,而中國則主張自然延伸和公平原則相結(jié)合的情況下,再考慮其他相關(guān)因素,通過雙方的協(xié)商來解決這些問題。中同圍繞釣魚島問題展開激烈的爭論,中國從國際法的各個(gè)角度不斷的論證釣魚群島是中國的領(lǐng)土,而同本也以其對釣魚島是無主地先占為理由,也主張其對釣魚島擁有主權(quán)。由于釣魚島周邊豐富的資源以及重要的戰(zhàn)略地位,中日雙方均對釣魚島主張權(quán)利,而對于這個(gè)問題,一直以來都沒有特別有效的方式來解決,而爭端一直都存在,因此近期要解決釣魚島問題難度很大。
[Abstract]:The sovereignty of Diaoyu Islands between China and Japan has always been debated since modern times, which is a very important issue affecting the relations between China and Japan since modern times. The Diaoyu Islands have all along been a very complex issue affecting Sino-Japanese relations. This issue involves not only China's national sovereignty and territorial integrity, but also various historical and legal issues. As a result, it has always been the focus of attention from all sides. Therefore, it is of great practical significance for China and Japan to discuss their positions and solutions on the settlement of the Diaoyu Island problem and the delimitation of the continental shelf in the East China Sea in order to alleviate the contradiction between China and Japan and to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests. Since ancient times, the Diaoyu Islands have been the territory of China, which is beyond doubt. However, since modern times, Japan has been trying its best to seize the Diaoyu Islands, and has taken a series of actions to occupy the Diaoyu Islands. These are some problems that we should pay enough attention to and try our best to solve. In the content, this article first introduced the Diaoyu Island question origin and the dispute summary, the Japanese side maintains the Diaoyu Island has been all along has no owner land, same this is carries on the no owner land first to acquire the territory sovereignty; China, on the other hand, has demonstrated Diaoyu Island's territory since ancient times from three angles. Then the territorial sovereignty of Diaoyu Island is analyzed from the angle of international law. The East China Sea is a semi-enclosed sea between the eastern coast of the mainland of China and the Sea of Japan. The continental shelf of the East China Sea is rich in resources, easy to exploit and has important military value. The Diaoyu Islands' territorial sovereignty, which the two countries have been arguing about, has never been resolved. There are great differences between China and China on the delimitation of the East China Sea. The differences mainly focus on two aspects, one is the delimitation principle of the continental shelf in the East China Sea, the other is the status of the Diaoyu Islands and the Okinawa trough in the delimitation of the continental shelf. On the issue of demarcation principle, the author thinks that the use of the intermediate line principle is an appropriate method, while China advocates the combination of natural extension and equity principle, taking into account other relevant factors, and resolving these problems through consultation between the two sides. China and China have argued from various angles of international law that the fishing Islands are China's territory, and that China also claims sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands on the grounds that it has no ownership of the Diaoyu Islands. Because of the rich resources and important strategic position around the Diaoyu Islands, both China and Japan claim the right to the Diaoyu Islands, but there has been no particularly effective way to resolve this issue, and the dispute has always existed. Therefore, it is very difficult to solve the Diaoyu Island problem in the near future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D993

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 溫柳;中日釣魚島主權(quán)爭端的國際法思考[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1864391