本文選題：《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》(ACTA) + 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)制度是指各國(guó)以海關(guān)為主的行政機(jī)關(guān),在進(jìn)出口環(huán)節(jié)對(duì)含有知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)侵權(quán)的商品采取扣押、中止放行的措施,及時(shí)阻止侵權(quán)商品進(jìn)入一國(guó)流通的法律制度,被稱(chēng)為是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的“最有效的行政救濟(jì)方法”。 本文旨在對(duì)2010年12月3日公布的《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》(ACTA)進(jìn)行分析,探討該協(xié)議中所規(guī)定的海關(guān)保護(hù)制度與TRIPs協(xié)議所規(guī)定的海關(guān)保護(hù)制度之間的差異,并進(jìn)而對(duì)該協(xié)議與我國(guó)現(xiàn)行海關(guān)保護(hù)制度進(jìn)行比較,試圖在此基礎(chǔ)上,預(yù)測(cè)該協(xié)議構(gòu)建的海關(guān)保護(hù)制度對(duì)我國(guó)企業(yè)和產(chǎn)業(yè)的影響,從而尋找有效的應(yīng)對(duì)之策。 全文兩萬(wàn)余字,共分為五個(gè)部分。 第一部分為概述,首先界定了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)制度的相關(guān)概念,論述了該制度對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的重要作用,并從海關(guān)保護(hù)制度的公益性質(zhì)出發(fā),闡明了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)要注意適度保護(hù)的問(wèn)題,還對(duì)ACTA的制定背景進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單介紹。 第二部分,探討了ACTA中海關(guān)保護(hù)制度與TRIPs相關(guān)規(guī)定的差異。一是海關(guān)保護(hù)客體范圍不同,表現(xiàn)在：要求適用的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)種類(lèi)有所增多、適用的侵權(quán)行為種類(lèi)有所擴(kuò)大、適用的海關(guān)環(huán)節(jié)有所擴(kuò)大、能夠享受措施豁免的物品范圍有所縮小；二是賦予海關(guān)當(dāng)局的權(quán)限有所擴(kuò)大,表現(xiàn)在：賦予海關(guān)當(dāng)局自行采取行動(dòng)的權(quán)力、海關(guān)向當(dāng)事人披露信息的權(quán)限有所擴(kuò)大；三是海關(guān)保護(hù)程序更加便捷高效,表現(xiàn)在：更完善的權(quán)利申請(qǐng)程序、更放松的擔(dān)�；虮ＷC形式、更高效的權(quán)利救濟(jì)方式；四是對(duì)被申請(qǐng)人權(quán)利的限制有所增多;此外,還分析了關(guān)于海關(guān)保護(hù)中的平行進(jìn)口問(wèn)題。 第三部分,將ACTA中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)制度與我國(guó)相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行了比較分析,特別是在關(guān)于出口貨物的適用、關(guān)于過(guò)境中貨物的適用、關(guān)于小件貨物和個(gè)人行李的適用、以及對(duì)提交反擔(dān)保放行的態(tài)度等方面,二者存在一定的差異。 第四部分,論述了ACTA中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)制度的影響,正面影響主要表現(xiàn)在它提高了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的海關(guān)保護(hù)水平,負(fù)面影響主要表現(xiàn)在大大增加了貿(mào)易成本,導(dǎo)致新的國(guó)際貿(mào)易壁壘的產(chǎn)生。 第五部分,提出了我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)ACTA知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)制度的對(duì)策建議。ACTA必將對(duì)我國(guó)企業(yè)帶來(lái)一定的負(fù)面影響,我國(guó)可以采取適當(dāng)措施以規(guī)避過(guò)境貨物的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)、有效處理侵權(quán)貨物,以迎接ACTA帶來(lái)的新挑戰(zhàn)。
[Abstract]:The system of customs protection of intellectual property rights refers to the legal system in which the customs administrations of various countries take measures to seize and suspend the release of goods containing intellectual property rights infringement in the import and export links, and to prevent the infringing commodities from entering the circulation of a country in a timely manner. It is called "the most effective administrative remedy" for the protection of intellectual property rights. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTAA) published on December 3, 2010, and to explore the differences between the customs protection system stipulated in the Agreement and the Customs Protection system stipulated in the TRIPs Agreement. On the basis of the comparison between the agreement and the current customs protection system of our country, this paper attempts to predict the influence of the customs protection system constructed by the agreement on the enterprises and industries of our country, so as to find effective countermeasures. Full text more than 20,000 words, a total of five parts. The first part is an overview, first defines the relevant concepts of the system of customs protection of intellectual property rights, discusses the important role of the system in the protection of intellectual property rights, and starts from the commonweal nature of the system of customs protection. This paper clarifies that the protection of intellectual property should pay attention to the problem of moderate protection, and briefly introduces the background of the formulation of ACTA. The second part discusses the differences between the customs protection system of ACTA and the relevant regulations of TRIPs. First, the scope of the object of customs protection is different, which is manifested in: the types of intellectual property rights required to be applied have increased, the types of applicable infringement acts have been expanded, the applicable customs links have been expanded, and the scope of articles that can enjoy the exemption of measures has been narrowed; Second, the powers given to the customs authorities have been expanded, as shown by: giving the customs authorities the power to take action on their own and the authority of the customs to disclose information to the parties; and third, the customs protection procedures are more convenient and efficient. They are: more perfect procedure of application, more relaxed form of guarantee or guarantee, more efficient way of right relief; fourth, more restrictions on the rights of the respondent; in addition, the problem of parallel import in customs protection is also analyzed. In the third part, the author makes a comparative analysis of the customs protection system of intellectual property rights in ACTA and the relevant provisions of our country, especially on the application of export goods, goods in transit, small goods and personal luggage. There are some differences between them in the attitude of submitting anti-guarantee release. In the fourth part, the author discusses the influence of the intellectual property protection system in ACTA. The positive influence is mainly reflected in the improvement of the level of customs protection of intellectual property rights, and the negative effect is mainly reflected in the increase of trade costs. Lead to the emergence of new international trade barriers. In the fifth part, the author puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions to the customs protection system of ACTA intellectual property rights. ACTA will inevitably bring some negative effects to Chinese enterprises. China can take appropriate measures to avoid the risk of goods in transit and deal with the infringing goods effectively. To meet the new challenges brought by ACTA.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 衣淑玲;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》談判述評(píng)[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年07期

2 崔國(guó)斌;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)議》與中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法的比較研究[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年08期

3 楊鴻;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)執(zhí)法規(guī)則研究[J];法商研究;2011年06期

4 符正;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》的主要特點(diǎn)及中國(guó)的應(yīng)對(duì)之策[J];中華商標(biāo);2012年02期

5 朱秋沅;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》[J];上海海關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

6 陳福利;;《反假冒貿(mào)易協(xié)定》述評(píng)[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 湯濤;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)海關(guān)保護(hù)制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1850679