本文選題：ICSID仲裁裁決 + 撤銷標準�。� 參考：《西南政法大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：ICSID仲裁撤銷制度是ICSID仲裁制度中維護仲裁裁決公正的唯一制度。在此制度中專門委員會依據(jù)《華盛頓公約》第52條規(guī)定的內(nèi)容對案件進行審查，然后其決定是否撤銷仲裁裁決。由于第52條規(guī)定的撤銷事由過于簡單，專門委員會在對案件審查時就必須解釋撤銷事由。然而每個專門委員會可能采取不同的方法解釋撤銷事由，所以造成每個案件的撤銷標準不同。從第一件撤銷案件到2010年夏天的撤銷案件看來，我們可以將撤銷標準劃分為四個階段，每個階段都呈現(xiàn)出不同的特點。文章從宏觀上把握每一代撤銷標準的大致趨向，再從微觀上觀察同一撤銷事由每代撤銷標準之間的差異，以更好地了解四代撤銷標準的變化趨勢。文章通過對撤銷標準的研究，以促進ICSID仲裁制度的發(fā)展，保障當事人的利益。 本文共分引言、正文、結(jié)束語三大部分，其中正文分為四個部分。文章通過對ICSID仲裁裁決的四代撤銷標準的研究，從宏觀及微觀的視角對每一代的撤銷標準進行了論述，分析每代之間的變化趨勢及對ICSID仲裁制度的影響。 第一部分概述了ICSID仲裁裁決撤銷標準發(fā)展的四代。首先從宏觀上把握每一代撤銷標準的特點。然后簡單地介紹了每一代的代表撤銷案件及每一代撤銷標準的整體特點，使讀者對于案件的撤銷情況及標準的特點有大致了解。其次對于四代撤銷標準的劃分進行了思考，對此劃分標準進行了闡述并提出自己的見解。 第二部分從“仲裁庭明顯越權(quán)”角度出發(fā)，對四代撤銷標準進行了論述。專門委員會是以仲裁庭“適用準據(jù)法缺陷”的問題來判斷仲裁庭是否越權(quán)，，此部分得出了每一代的此項撤銷標準。通過分析這些撤銷標準在實踐中的運用，發(fā)現(xiàn)專門委員會的審查范圍逐漸擴大，撤銷標準開始降低。這一變化趨勢促使設立ICSID上訴機構(gòu)的呼聲高漲，同時也呼吁雙方當事人在簽訂雙邊條約時，完善準據(jù)法的適用條款。 第三部分是以“嚴重違背基本程序規(guī)則”的視角來論述四代撤銷標準。專門委員會在判斷仲裁庭是否“嚴重違背基本程序規(guī)則”時，主要是從“侵犯當事人申辯權(quán)”、“違反證據(jù)規(guī)則”、“違反公平待遇原則”三方面進行判斷。本部分結(jié)合代表案件進行分析，得到了每一代的此項撤銷標準。當事人的申辯權(quán)逐漸引起人們重視，專門委員會對于“嚴重違背基本程序規(guī)則”的解釋也逐漸清晰。這些變化不僅要求ICSID仲裁制度充分保護當事人的權(quán)利，還要求仲裁員不斷提高其自身的素質(zhì)。 第四部分從“裁決未陳述其所依據(jù)理由”方面，對四代撤銷標準進行了論述。專門委員會是以仲裁庭在裁決中“未陳述理由”和“理由矛盾”來判斷仲裁庭是否構(gòu)成此項撤銷事由。本部分通過對代表案件的分析，發(fā)現(xiàn)每一代的此項撤銷標準逐漸變得寬，但仍然缺乏統(tǒng)一的標準。這一變化要求在ICSID仲裁制度中建立遵循先例制度，仲裁庭可以參照先例仲裁案件，不僅可防止案件被撤銷，還可提高仲裁的效率。
[Abstract]:ICSID is the only system of arbitration revocation system maintenance arbitration justice ICSID arbitration system. In this system, the Special Committee on the basis of "Washington Convention > fifty-second of the provisions of the review of the case, and then decide whether the revocation of an arbitral award. Due to the provisions of article fifty-second of the revocation of the subject is too simple, the Special Committee on review of the case must be explain the cause for cancellation. However, each special committee may adopt different methods to explain the cause for cancellation, resulting in each case the revocation of different standards. The first piece to dismiss the case in the summer of 2010 to withdraw the case view, we can cancel the standard is divided into four stages, each stage has different characteristics. This article from the macro grasp the general direction of each generation to revoke the standard, the same cause for each generation to revoke the differences between the standards and then observe from the micro level, in order to better In order to understand the change trend of the four generation revocation standard, the article through the study of the revocation standard, in order to promote the development of the ICSID arbitration system and protect the interests of the parties.
This paper consists of introduction, text, conclusion of three parts, of which the body is divided into four parts. Through the research on the standard of ICSID arbitral awards revocation of the four generation, has carried on the elaboration to each generation of cancellation standards from macro and micro perspective, analysis of trends in each generation and influence on ICSID arbitration system.
The first part summarizes the development of ICSID standard of the four generation of revocation of arbitral awards. First from the macro grasp the characteristics of each generation of revocation standards. And then briefly introduces the representative of each generation of the withdrawal of the case and overall characteristics of each generation to revoke the standard, so that the reader and the standard features of the revocation of the case have a general understanding. Secondly, for the four generation of revocation criterion is taken into consideration, this division standard is discussed and put forward their own views.
The second part embarks from "the arbitration tribunal was ultra vires" point of view, the cancellation standards of four generation are discussed. The Special Committee on the arbitration tribunal "applicable law defects" to judge whether the arbitration tribunal of the ultra vires, obtained some every generation of the revocation standard. Through the analysis of the use of these cancellation standards in practice the special committee found, gradually expanding the scope, the cancellation standards began to decrease. This trend prompted the establishment of the ICSID appellate body growing louder, also called on the parties at the signing of a bilateral treaty, perfecting the applicable provisions of the applicable law.
The third part is to "seriously violates the basic rules of procedure" from the perspective of this four generation revocation standards. A special committee in the arbitration tribunal to judge whether a "serious violation of the basic rules of procedure", mainly from the "violations of the right to defence", "violation of rules of evidence", "unfair treatment principle" in three aspects of the judgment. According to representative case analysis, obtained each generation of the revocation criteria. The pleadings of the parties concerned right gradually aroused people's attention, the special committee for "serious violation of the basic rules of procedure" interpretation is gradually clear. These changes not only on the ICSID arbitration system to fully protect the rights of the parties, but also requires an arbitrator to continuously improve its own the quality.
The fourth part from the "statement of the award is not according to reason, the cancellation standards of the four generation are discussed. The Special Committee on the arbitration tribunal in the ruling" reasons "and" reason contradiction "to judge the arbitration tribunal constitutes the revocation of the subject. This part through the analysis of representative cases, found each generation of the cancellation standards gradually become wide, but still lack of uniform standards. This change requires the establishment of the precedent system in the ICSID arbitration institution, the arbitration tribunal may refer to precedents of arbitration, not only can prevent the case was dismissed, but also can improve the efficiency of arbitration.

【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D997.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 魏艷茹;ICSID仲裁撤銷制度比較研究[J];商業(yè)研究;2004年23期

2 劉筍;;國際投資仲裁裁決的不一致性問題及其解決[J];法商研究;2009年06期

3 李萬強;;《華盛頓公約》裁決撤銷理由的理解適用[J];仲裁研究;2007年01期

4 余勁松;;國際投資條約仲裁中投資者與東道國權(quán)益保護平衡問題研究[J];中國法學;2011年02期

本文編號：1750649