用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t在國際投資領(lǐng)域的適用
發(fā)布時間：2018-04-11 22:22
本文選題：用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?/strong> + 國際投資 ； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文
【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟全球化的進展，當(dāng)今經(jīng)濟活動多樣復(fù)雜性的特征明顯，而國際投資在其中的地位顯現(xiàn)出逐漸提高的趨勢，與之相伴，國際投資領(lǐng)域發(fā)生的爭端也日益增多并趨于復(fù)雜化。在這種背景下，只有保證國際投資爭議的解決方式妥當(dāng)，才能進一步推動和促進國家與地區(qū)間的經(jīng)濟交流和世界經(jīng)濟的總體發(fā)展。而用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t作為一項傳統(tǒng)的習(xí)慣國際法原則，在解決國際投資爭議方面既得到了適用，同時也受到了挑戰(zhàn)。具體而言，這一原則一方面得到傳統(tǒng)的國際法學(xué)家的贊同的同時也被各國國內(nèi)實踐和國際判例所引用和采納，另一方面在近些年也受到了投資自由化、弱化東道國外資管轄權(quán)等“理論”的挑戰(zhàn)和相關(guān)雙邊和多邊投資協(xié)定對相關(guān)投資爭議解決方式約定中對其的削弱�？v觀我國有關(guān)國內(nèi)法律和對外簽訂的雙邊投資協(xié)定和加入的多邊投資協(xié)定，這些文件雖然主張有關(guān)爭端采用當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷鉀Q，但同時也允許采用外國仲裁或國際仲裁解決，并趨向于不再堅持將用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷鳛樘幚碇袊c外國投資者爭議的根本原則，允許投資爭議事項不經(jīng)東道國救濟而直接提起國際仲裁。 針對這種變化和我國當(dāng)前對投資爭議解決的態(tài)度，我們應(yīng)如何對待？“卡爾沃主義”在某種程度上的復(fù)蘇是否意味著用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t遭遇挑戰(zhàn)后又有重新被重視的趨勢？這是否會對國際投資爭議的解決有所影響？這些是都是在當(dāng)前國際投資大環(huán)境下需要思考的問題。 本文通過歷史研究法、比較研究法、文獻研究法、以案例為基礎(chǔ)的實證分析法的運用，總結(jié)和探討用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的內(nèi)涵及理論依據(jù)、適用及適用例外，并比較多邊及雙邊投資協(xié)定關(guān)于東道國當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷椒ǖ膶嵺`，，分析國際上對用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的具體適用情況、各自態(tài)度及變化趨勢。在梳理我國現(xiàn)行對外投資實踐后，對用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t在我國對外投資中如何適用提出見解。 全文由三部分組成： 第一章通過對國際投資爭端和用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的理論知識進行總結(jié)和探討，闡述了國際投資的類型和定義、用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的內(nèi)涵及理論基礎(chǔ)，為后續(xù)章節(jié)的討論做好理論鋪墊。 第二章作為本文的核心章節(jié)，對用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t在國際投資領(lǐng)域的適用問題進行了全面的分析。首先分析了用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t在國際法領(lǐng)域尤其是國際投資領(lǐng)域的適用范圍、適用例外和適用要求，其次重點分析當(dāng)代國際投資法制體系下的用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的適用實踐，包括ICSID、MIGA、NAFTA、TPP等多邊投資機制、美式BIT和BIT中“岔路口條款”、世界上主要國家的國內(nèi)立法對用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的適用態(tài)度，以及對用盡期限的討論。 最后一章從我國立法和司法實踐入手，先從相關(guān)立法規(guī)定，尤其是我國對外簽署的BIT中投資爭議解決條款分析我國在不同時期對用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的不同態(tài)度，然后提出了對完善我國適用當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的個人見解。
[Abstract]:With the development of economic globalization , today ' s economic activity is characterized by various complexity , while international investment has become more and more complicated in the field of international investment . In particular , the principle of exhaustion of local remedies has also been cited and adopted by domestic practice and international jurisprudence . On the other hand , the principle of exhaustion of local remedies has been solved by domestic practice and international jurisprudence . In the meantime , it also allows foreign arbitration or international arbitration to settle disputes , and tends to stop using local remedies as the fundamental principle of dealing with disputes between China and foreign investors , and allows investment disputes to be directly international arbitration without the relief of the host country .
How should we deal with this change and our country ' s current attitude towards investment disputes ? Does the recovery mean that there is a tendency for renewed attention after the challenge of exhaustion of local remedies ? Will this affect the settlement of international investment disputes ? These are issues that need to be thought in the current international investment environment .
Based on historical research , comparative research , literature research , case - based empirical analysis , this paper summarizes and discusses the connotation and theoretical basis of exhaustion of local remedies , applies and applies exceptions , and compares the application of multilateral and bilateral investment agreements on local remedies in host countries .
The full text consists of three parts :
Chapter one summarizes and discusses the theoretical knowledge of international investment disputes and the exhaustion of local remedies , expounds the types and definitions of international investment , the connotation and theoretical basis of the exhaustion of local remedies , and lays the theoretical foundation for the discussion of the following chapters .
Chapter 2 , as the core of this paper , comprehensively analyzes the application of the principle of exhaustion of local remedies in the field of international investment . First , it analyzes the application of the principle of exhaustion of local remedies in the field of international law , especially in the field of international investment , and analyzes the applicable practice of the exhaustion of local remedies in the field of international law .
The last chapter starts with the legislative and judicial practice of our country , firstly , from the relevant legislative provisions , especially the dispute settlement clauses in the BIT signed by our country , analyzes the different attitudes towards the exhaustion of local remedies in different periods , and then puts forward some personal opinions on improving the application of local remedies in our country .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D996.4
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 黃澗秋,馮兵;用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷cGATT/WTO爭端解決[J];法學(xué)評論;2005年06期
2 張麗娜;;略論國際投資法的自由化趨勢——兼評我國的投資法律實踐[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2010年01期
3 王海浪;;ICSID體制內(nèi)用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷瓌t的三大挑戰(zhàn)及對策[J];國際經(jīng)濟法學(xué)刊;2006年03期
4 徐崇利;;國際投資條約中的“岔路口條款”:選擇“當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷迸c“國際仲裁”權(quán)利之限度[J];國際經(jīng)濟法學(xué)刊;2007年03期
5 李華成;徐明;楊清華;;“用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷痹趪H投資領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用及其面臨的挑戰(zhàn)[J];安徽商貿(mào)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年04期
6 杜萱;;試析用盡當(dāng)?shù)鼐葷?guī)則在國際投資法中的適用[J];青海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年03期
本文編號：1737893
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/1737893.html
