本文選題：自由貿(mào)易區(qū) + 中國-東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)　； 參考：《安徽大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：建立中國——東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的設(shè)想是2000年11月在新加坡召開的中國與東盟領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人會議期間提出的。中國和東盟成員國共同簽署了《爭端解決機(jī)制協(xié)議》等文件,主要包括磋商、調(diào)解、仲裁等內(nèi)容,標(biāo)志著中國和東盟成員對建立建議機(jī)制、磋商機(jī)制、司法裁判機(jī)制等已經(jīng)達(dá)成共識,為中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)的運作奠定了法律基礎(chǔ)并提供了法律保障。但該協(xié)議所確立的爭端解決機(jī)制尚存在不少問題,如仲裁表決方式不妥、仲裁裁決復(fù)核程序缺損、執(zhí)行程序的欠缺等。鑒此,有必要對中國—東盟爭端解決機(jī)制加以探討并提出完善的對策建議,希望對促進(jìn)中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制的進(jìn)一步完善有所裨益。 本文共分四個部分。第一部分“中國——東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制的一般分析”,該部分主要介紹了中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制協(xié)議的產(chǎn)生背景、意義、特點及主要內(nèi)容。第二部分“中國——東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制與WTO爭端解決機(jī)制的比較”,該部分就兩者在針對爭端解決機(jī)制的基本程序、,適用范圍與主體、,工作時限和爭端解決機(jī)構(gòu)及爭端解決機(jī)制的評價等方面進(jìn)行了比較分析。第三部分“中國——東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制存在的問題”,該部分主要分析了中國——東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制存在的問題,從五個方面來分析中國——東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制存在的現(xiàn)實缺陷。第四部分“完善中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制的建議”,該部分針對如何解決前述存在的問題提出了具體的建議,如中國——東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)法制建設(shè),完善仲裁庭組成人員條件與仲裁裁決復(fù)核程序,將爭端主體范圍應(yīng)擴(kuò)大到私人,企業(yè)與管轄制度中增設(shè)專屬管轄等。
[Abstract]:The idea of establishing a China-ASEAN Free Trade area was put forward during the China-ASEAN leaders' meeting held in Singapore in November 2000.China and ASEAN members have jointly signed the "Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism" and other documents, mainly including consultation, mediation, arbitration, etc., indicating that China and ASEAN members have decided to establish a proposal mechanism and a consultation mechanism.The judicial adjudication mechanism has reached a consensus, which has laid a legal foundation and provided legal guarantee for the operation of China-ASEAN Free Trade area.However, there are still many problems in the dispute settlement mechanism established by the agreement, such as the improper voting method of arbitration, the defect of review procedure of arbitration award, the lack of execution procedure and so on.In view of this, it is necessary to probe into the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN and put forward some countermeasures and suggestions, hoping to promote the further improvement of the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area.This paper is divided into four parts.The first part is "General Analysis of the dispute settlement Mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area", which mainly introduces the background, significance, characteristics and main contents of the Agreement on dispute settlement Mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area.The second part is "the comparison between the dispute settlement Mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area and the dispute settlement Mechanism of WTO".In this part, the author makes a comparative analysis on the basic procedure of the dispute settlement mechanism, the scope of application and the subject, the working time limit and the evaluation of the dispute settlement body and the dispute settlement mechanism.The third part is "the problems existing in the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area", which mainly analyzes the problems existing in the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area.This paper analyzes the practical defects of the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area from five aspects.The fourth part, "suggestions on perfecting the dispute settlement mechanism of China-ASEAN Free Trade area", puts forward specific suggestions on how to solve the problems mentioned above, such as the legal construction of China-ASEAN Free Trade area.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D996.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 潘鴻圓;中國—東盟自由貿(mào)易區(qū)爭端解決機(jī)制存在的問題及完善對策[D];云南大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1735734