本文選題：危害人類罪　切入點(diǎn)：羅馬規(guī)約　出處：《哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：國(guó)際刑法中所說(shuō)的危害人類罪被稱為“最惡之罪”，是國(guó)際社會(huì)密切關(guān)注的一種嚴(yán)重的國(guó)際罪行。在20世紀(jì)初的《色佛爾條約》開(kāi)始有法律文獻(xiàn)意識(shí)到危害人類罪，到《紐倫堡國(guó)際軍事法庭憲章》明確規(guī)定危害人類罪，并且付諸實(shí)踐，危害人類罪隨著國(guó)際刑法的發(fā)展而不斷的發(fā)展，國(guó)際社會(huì)也越來(lái)越重視，但到目前為止，，危害人類罪的發(fā)展還沒(méi)有一個(gè)特別清晰、權(quán)威的脈絡(luò)。 通過(guò)運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)分析法、規(guī)范分析法、案例分析法和比較分析法等研究方法，系統(tǒng)而全面地梳理了危害人類罪的發(fā)展歷史，并以事前立法和事后立法為線索，將其劃分為兩個(gè)大的發(fā)展階段，對(duì)每一個(gè)出現(xiàn)重大變化的歷史階段進(jìn)行分析，重點(diǎn)分析危害人類罪在現(xiàn)階段的發(fā)展創(chuàng)新點(diǎn)。以國(guó)際刑法中的重要法律文件《羅馬規(guī)約》為著眼點(diǎn)，創(chuàng)新性的從實(shí)體創(chuàng)制和程序創(chuàng)制兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述，實(shí)體方面從定義和構(gòu)成要件出發(fā)，輔之以犯罪公知性和責(zé)任模式的規(guī)定，程序方面從原則性的規(guī)定入手，充分證明了《羅馬規(guī)約》在打擊危害人類罪方面做出的突出貢獻(xiàn)，因此得出《羅馬規(guī)約》危害人類罪發(fā)展歷史上的一座豐碑這一結(jié)論。又因?yàn)槔葋喎缸锴閯?shì)是危害人類罪的最新司法實(shí)踐，賦予了該罪嶄新的時(shí)代內(nèi)容，通過(guò)對(duì)利比亞發(fā)最新情勢(shì)的深入剖析，總結(jié)出危害人類罪在四個(gè)方面的司法創(chuàng)制，包括安理會(huì)移交非締約國(guó)情勢(shì)、對(duì)非武裝沖突可以進(jìn)行管轄、間接犯罪和保護(hù)的責(zé)任首次由理論走向?qū)嵺`，該罪在實(shí)踐中又有了新的發(fā)展。由此，在理論上可以明晰危害人類罪在各個(gè)發(fā)展階段的特征及實(shí)踐法則，彌補(bǔ)當(dāng)前學(xué)者對(duì)此罪研究的單一和片面；在實(shí)踐中又可以由利比亞的審判實(shí)踐威懾其他國(guó)家對(duì)示威活動(dòng)的處置以及完善人權(quán)的保護(hù)，同時(shí)也對(duì)我國(guó)的司法態(tài)度、法治、外交等方面有著深刻的啟示。
[Abstract]:The crimes against humanity in international criminal law are called "the worst crimes", which is a serious international crime that the international community pays close attention to.At the beginning of the twentieth century, the Treaty of Seville began to have legal literature on crimes against humanity, and by the Charter of the International military Tribunal of Nuremberg, crimes against humanity were clearly defined and put into practice,With the development of international criminal law, crimes against humanity continue to develop, and the international community pays more and more attention to them. However, up to now, the development of crimes against humanity has not been a particularly clear and authoritative context.By using the methods of literature analysis, normative analysis, case analysis and comparative analysis, this paper systematically and comprehensively combs the development history of crimes against humanity, and takes the prior legislation and the ex post legislation as the clue.It is divided into two major stages of development, each of the major changes in the historical stage of analysis, focusing on the development of crimes against humanity in the current stage of innovation.Focusing on the important legal document "Rome Statute" in international criminal law, this paper discusses innovatively from two aspects of entity creation and procedure creation.Supplemented by the provisions of the model of public awareness and responsibility of crimes, and proceeding from the provisions of principle, the Rome Statute fully proves the outstanding contribution that the Rome Statute has made in the fight against crimes against humanity,The conclusion of the Rome Statute is that it is a monument in the history of crimes against humanity.And because the Libyan criminal situation is the latest judicial practice of crimes against humanity, it has given the crime a new content of the times. Through in-depth analysis of the latest situation in Libya, the judicial creation of crimes against humanity in four aspects has been summed up.For the first time, the indirect crime and the responsibility to protect have changed from theory to practice, and the crime has made new development in practice, including the transfer of non-party situations by the Security Council, the jurisdiction over non-armed conflict, and the transition of indirect crime and responsibility to protect from theory to practice for the first time.Therefore, in theory, the characteristics and practical rules of crimes against humanity in various stages of development can be clarified, making up for the single and one-sided research on this crime by scholars at present;In practice, the Libyan trial practice can deter other countries to deal with demonstrations and improve the protection of human rights, but also has profound enlightenment to our country's judicial attitude, rule of law, diplomacy and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 繆因知;;論國(guó)際法上反人道罪的發(fā)生范圍與管轄權(quán)的演進(jìn)[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2007年02期

2 杜啟新;;危害人類罪的主觀要件[J];法學(xué)雜志;2007年04期

3 楊永紅;;論保護(hù)責(zé)任對(duì)利比亞之適用[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年02期

4 張貴玲;;論危害人類罪[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

5 高銘暄;王俊平;;論《羅馬規(guī)約》規(guī)定的危害人類罪的前提要件[J];南開(kāi)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年01期

6 劉大群;;論危害人類罪[J];武大國(guó)際法評(píng)論;2006年01期

7 黃俊平;論普遍管轄原則的適用條件[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

本文編號(hào)：1717712