本文選題：中美出版物案　切入點(diǎn)：服務(wù)貿(mào)易　出處：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以中美關(guān)于中國(guó)影響特定出版物和音像娛樂制品貿(mào)易權(quán)及分銷權(quán)的措施案的專家組及上訴機(jī)構(gòu)裁決為切入點(diǎn)，論述了中國(guó)外商投資法律制度存在的問題。中美出版物案是中國(guó)加入世界貿(mào)易組織以后，面對(duì)的第一起服務(wù)貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端案件。服務(wù)貿(mào)易與跨國(guó)直接投資息息相關(guān)，外國(guó)投資者通過商業(yè)存在的模式在他國(guó)進(jìn)行直接投資是國(guó)際服務(wù)貿(mào)易的主要模式。中國(guó)建立了較為完善的外商投資法律制度，采取了限制性的外商投資產(chǎn)業(yè)政策，同時(shí)為了加入世界貿(mào)易組織對(duì)外商投資法律制度做了相應(yīng)的修改。盡管如此，中美出版物案表明，中國(guó)外商投資法律制度仍然存在著許多問題。 本文第一部分和第二部分分別介紹了世界貿(mào)易組織和中國(guó)的跨國(guó)投資規(guī)則。文章的第三部分結(jié)合中美出版物案中專家組和上訴機(jī)構(gòu)的裁決，分析中國(guó)現(xiàn)階段在外商投資法律制度存在的問題及根源，主要體現(xiàn)對(duì)外商投資企業(yè)的認(rèn)識(shí)不清、外商投資立法滯后于市場(chǎng)發(fā)展、外商投資產(chǎn)業(yè)政策不符合入世承諾以及對(duì)外商投資企業(yè)存在不合理的限制措施。 對(duì)外商投資法律制度的分析的意義在于通過發(fā)現(xiàn)并認(rèn)識(shí)問題，，一方面有助于進(jìn)一步完善外商投資法律體制，從而更好的利用和管理外資；另一方面就正在進(jìn)行的世界貿(mào)易組織多哈回合談判對(duì)中國(guó)的立場(chǎng)提出一些看法。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the problems existing in the legal system of foreign investment in China, starting from the decisions of the panel of experts and the appellate bodies concerning the measures taken by China to influence the trade and distribution rights of certain publications and audiovisual entertainment products in China.The Sino-American publication case is the first service trade dispute that China has faced since its entry into the World Trade Organization (WTO).Service trade is closely related to transnational direct investment. Foreign investors make direct investment in other countries through the mode of commercial existence, which is the main mode of international trade in services.China has established a relatively perfect legal system for foreign investment, adopted restrictive industrial policies on foreign investment, and made corresponding amendments to the legal system of foreign investment in order to join the World Trade Organization.Nevertheless, the Sino-American publication case shows that there are still many problems in China's foreign investment legal system.The first part and the second part respectively introduce the WTO and China's transnational investment rules.In the third part of the article, in combination with the rulings of the panel of experts and the appellate bodies in the publication case between China and the United States, the author analyzes the existing problems and causes of the legal system of foreign investment in China at the present stage, which mainly reflects the unclear understanding of foreign-invested enterprises.The legislation of foreign investment lags behind the development of the market, the industrial policy of foreign investment does not accord with the promise of WTO entry and there are unreasonable restrictive measures for foreign invested enterprises.The significance of the analysis of the legal system of foreign investment lies in the discovery and understanding of the problems, on the one hand, the further improvement of the legal system of foreign investment, so as to make better use and management of foreign capital;On the other hand, put forward some views on China's position in the ongoing Doha Round of WTO negotiations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國(guó)期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前8條

1 劉文華;張蕾;王楊;;入世十年中國(guó)外商投資法的回眸與展望[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

2 房東;;對(duì)“文本”的揚(yáng)棄:WTO條約解釋方法的一種修正——以服務(wù)貿(mào)易具體承諾表的解釋為分析起點(diǎn)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年03期

3 余勁松;論國(guó)際投資法的晚近發(fā)展[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1997年06期

4 韓立余;;從中美出版物案看中國(guó)幾世對(duì)中國(guó)外商投資法律制度的影響[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)刊;2010年02期

5 賀小勇;;WTO框架下中美文化作品市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入爭(zhēng)端的法律問題[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2008年06期

6 王友根;龔柏華;;中美出版物和音響產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入WTO爭(zhēng)端案述評(píng)[J];國(guó)際商務(wù)研究;2010年01期

7 漆多俊;;市場(chǎng)國(guó)際化、國(guó)際調(diào)節(jié)及相關(guān)法律問題[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)法論叢;2004年00期

8 張敏;;從WTO中美出版物市場(chǎng)準(zhǔn)入案看中國(guó)服務(wù)貿(mào)易承諾表的解釋[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2010年S6期

本文編號(hào)：1717594