發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-06 03:40

  本文選題：訴訟時(shí)效期間和起算　切入點(diǎn)：訴訟時(shí)效中止和中斷　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文的研究對(duì)象是水上貨物運(yùn)輸法律制度中的訴訟時(shí)效。本文所指的水上貨物運(yùn)輸包括海上貨物運(yùn)輸、國(guó)際河流貨物運(yùn)輸以及我國(guó)沿海和內(nèi)水貨物運(yùn)輸。本文圍繞《海牙規(guī)則》、《維斯比規(guī)則》、《漢堡規(guī)則》、《鹿特丹公約》和《關(guān)于內(nèi)河貨物運(yùn)輸合同的布達(dá)佩斯公約》以及我國(guó)《海商法》及相關(guān)法律法規(guī),結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)相關(guān)案例全面地討論與水上貨物運(yùn)輸有關(guān)的訴訟時(shí)效問(wèn)題。 本文分六章。第一章是對(duì)整個(gè)民事訴訟時(shí)效制度的概括分析,從民法的基本原理出發(fā),對(duì)訴訟時(shí)效的概念、訴訟時(shí)效的功能、時(shí)效的期間和起算、中止和中斷以及協(xié)議延長(zhǎng)進(jìn)行詳細(xì)的理論分析,為下文討論水上貨物運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效作理論的鋪墊。該章分五節(jié),分別敘述上述五個(gè)部分的內(nèi)容,與本文后五章論述的內(nèi)容相對(duì)應(yīng),形成完整的結(jié)構(gòu)。這樣的結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)置是希望本文既有理論深度,又能結(jié)合水上貨物運(yùn)輸法律關(guān)系的特點(diǎn)做實(shí)證的分析。第二至第五章討論水上貨物運(yùn)輸時(shí)效,分兩部分,第一部分是對(duì)海上貨物運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效的討論,第二部分是對(duì)我國(guó)沿海和內(nèi)水運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效的討論以及對(duì)國(guó)際河流貨物運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效的討論。第一部分包括第二至第四章,第二章討論的是海上貨物運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效的期間和起算,由于我國(guó)并未參加任何相關(guān)的國(guó)際公約,因此有必要分國(guó)際公約和我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法律規(guī)定兩個(gè)層面進(jìn)行論述,第三章和第四章分別討論海上貨物運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效的中止和中斷及協(xié)議延長(zhǎng),同樣也分為國(guó)際公約和我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法律兩個(gè)層面進(jìn)行論述。第五章討論國(guó)際河流以及我國(guó)沿海和內(nèi)水運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效,分兩節(jié)論述國(guó)際河流貨物運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效制度和我國(guó)沿海和內(nèi)水貨物運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效制度。第六章集中分析了關(guān)于訴訟時(shí)效的三個(gè)特別問(wèn)題：承運(yùn)人起訴貨方應(yīng)適用的訴訟時(shí)效、運(yùn)輸合同第三方與訴訟時(shí)效的適用以及執(zhí)行時(shí)效和追訴時(shí)效與訴訟時(shí)效的區(qū)別。結(jié)論部分主要總結(jié)了本文的特點(diǎn)并重述筆者對(duì)我國(guó)完善水上貨物運(yùn)輸訴訟時(shí)效制度的建議。 本文論述的主要目的在于,在對(duì)國(guó)際公約和我國(guó)法律訴訟時(shí)效制度的各個(gè)要素進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析和梳理的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)我國(guó)水上貨物運(yùn)輸時(shí)效制度作出有建設(shè)性的完善建議。
[Abstract]:The object of this paper is the limitation of action in the legal system of water cargo transportation.This article refers to the sea cargo transport, international river cargo transport and coastal and inland water cargo transport.This paper focuses on the Hague rules, the Visby rules, the Hamburg rules, the Rotterdam Convention and the Budapest Convention on the contract for the Carriage of goods by Inland Water, as well as the Maritime Law of China and the relevant laws and regulations.Combined with domestic related cases, this paper comprehensively discusses the limitation of action related to the carriage of goods on water.This paper is divided into six chapters.The first chapter is the general analysis of the civil limitation system, starting from the basic principles of the civil law, the concept of the statute of limitations, the function of the statute of limitations, the limitation period and the starting calculation,The theoretical analysis of suspension, interruption and extension of the agreement lays the groundwork for the following discussion on the limitation of action for the carriage of goods on water.This chapter is divided into five sections, respectively describing the contents of the above five parts, corresponding to the content discussed in the last five chapters, forming a complete structure.It is hoped that this paper can make empirical analysis on the characteristics of the legal relationship of water freight transportation.Chapters II to V discuss the limitation period for the carriage of goods on water, which is divided into two parts. The first part is a discussion of the limitation period for the carriage of goods by sea.The second part is the discussion of the statute of limitations of the coastal and internal water transportation in China and the limitation of the international river cargo transport.The first part consists of chapters II to IV, and Chapter II deals with the period and commencement of the statute of limitations for the carriage of goods by sea, since our country is not a party to any relevant international conventions,Therefore, it is necessary to discuss it from two aspects of international conventions and domestic laws. The third and fourth chapters respectively discuss the suspension and interruption of the statute of limitations in the carriage of goods by sea and the extension of the agreement.Also divides into the international convention and our country domestic law two stratification plane carries on the elaboration.The fifth chapter discusses the statute of limitations of international rivers and China's coastal and internal water transportation. It is divided into two sections to discuss the statute of limitations system of international river cargo transport and China's coastal and internal water cargo transport limitation system.Chapter six focuses on three special issues concerning the limitation of action: the limitation of action to be applied by the carrier to the cargo party, the application of the limitation to third parties and the limitation of action in the contract of carriage, and the difference between the limitation of execution and the limitation of action.The conclusion part mainly summarizes the characteristics of this paper and restates the author's suggestions on perfecting the limitation system of maritime cargo transportation in China.The main purpose of this paper is to make constructive suggestions on the prescription system of water cargo transportation on the basis of detailed analysis and combing of various elements of international conventions and the statute of limitations system of legal action in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D996.19;D922.294;D923.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 司玉琢;UNCITRAL運(yùn)輸法(草案)難點(diǎn)問(wèn)題研究[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年01期

2 尹繼良 ,丁永懷 ,曾玉珊;對(duì)我國(guó)普通訴訟時(shí)效期間的反思[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年01期

3 魏盛禮;;完全的實(shí)體權(quán)利消滅主義:我國(guó)訴訟時(shí)效效力立法的應(yīng)然選擇——訴訟時(shí)效基本理論的反思與我國(guó)訴訟時(shí)效立法的重新選擇(之四)[J];河北法學(xué);2006年11期

4 馬晶晶,姚洪秀;實(shí)際承運(yùn)人的若干法律問(wèn)題[J];上海海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 卜威;訴訟時(shí)效的法律適用規(guī)則探討[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2007年

2 周新;訴訟時(shí)效法律適用問(wèn)題研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1717843