本文選題：獨(dú)立擔(dān)保　切入點(diǎn)：獨(dú)立保函　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度是近些年國(guó)際貿(mào)易融資中擔(dān)保方式發(fā)生的巨大創(chuàng)新和變革，較之于傳統(tǒng)從屬性擔(dān)保制度的債權(quán)保全功能，獨(dú)立擔(dān)保更加注重融資功能。獨(dú)立保函作為獨(dú)立擔(dān)保理論指導(dǎo)實(shí)踐的產(chǎn)物及其主要載體，從產(chǎn)生之時(shí)便備受關(guān)注，在URDG758出臺(tái)后尤甚。獨(dú)立保函獨(dú)立于基礎(chǔ)合同以及單據(jù)化處理的特征使保函開(kāi)立人（擔(dān)保人）較易罹患欺詐風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，而國(guó)際大宗貿(mào)易中獨(dú)立保函的受益人卻希望通過(guò)轉(zhuǎn)讓保函以實(shí)現(xiàn)快速、便捷的融資，這必然加大了擔(dān)保人面臨的欺詐風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。要平衡并解決這一現(xiàn)實(shí)矛盾，就必須對(duì)獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓相關(guān)的法律問(wèn)題進(jìn)行深入分析。 首先，從法律上界定獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓僅僅應(yīng)該是獨(dú)立保函受益人變更所導(dǎo)致的保函流轉(zhuǎn)行為。其次，以URDG758第33條為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，結(jié)合獨(dú)立保函的司法實(shí)踐將獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓劃分為獨(dú)立保函權(quán)利轉(zhuǎn)讓和獨(dú)立保函收益轉(zhuǎn)讓兩種形式；并將前者的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定為特殊的債權(quán)讓與，將后者的性質(zhì)認(rèn)定為受益人自由處分預(yù)期財(cái)產(chǎn)的行為。之后，基于兩種轉(zhuǎn)讓形式，分別論及獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓中的擔(dān)保人、受益人和受讓人各自的法律地位及相互關(guān)系。再者，從理論走向?qū)嵺`，剖析福費(fèi)廷業(yè)務(wù)中涉及的獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓問(wèn)題及獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓在福費(fèi)廷業(yè)務(wù)中的復(fù)雜性。最后，以理論指導(dǎo)實(shí)踐，通過(guò)梳理我國(guó)立法和司法層面對(duì)獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度的態(tài)度，明確我國(guó)應(yīng)該從《擔(dān)保法》第5條第1款的法律釋義和內(nèi)在邏輯傳承關(guān)系承認(rèn)獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度的存在。并結(jié)合《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理獨(dú)立保函糾紛案件若干問(wèn)題的規(guī)定（征求意見(jiàn)稿）》對(duì)我國(guó)獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓制度提出合理構(gòu)建，，明確國(guó)內(nèi)及涉外獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓行為的法律適用。
[Abstract]:The independent guarantee system is a great innovation and reform in the international trade financing in recent years. Compared with the traditional subordinate guarantee system, the independent guarantee pays more attention to the financing function.As the product of independent guarantee theory and its main carrier, independent guarantee has attracted much attention since its emergence, especially after the introduction of URDG758.The independence of an independent guarantee from the underlying contract and the characteristics of documentary processing make the issuer (guarantor) more vulnerable to the risk of fraud, whereas in international bulk trade the beneficiary of the independent guarantee wishes to achieve speed through the transfer of the guarantee.Convenient financing, this is bound to increase the guarantor faced the risk of fraud.In order to balance and solve this realistic contradiction, we must deeply analyze the legal problems related to the transfer of independent guarantee.First of all, the legal definition of the transfer of independent guarantee should only be caused by the change of the beneficiary of the independent guarantee.Secondly, the transfer of the independent guarantee is divided into two forms: the transfer of the right of the independent guarantee and the transfer of the proceeds of the independent guarantee, and the nature of the former is regarded as the special assignment of the creditor's rights, taking Article 33 of the URDG758 as the starting point and combining with the judicial practice of the independent guarantee.The nature of the latter as the beneficiary's free disposition of the intended property.Then, based on the two forms of assignment, the legal status and relationship of the guarantor, beneficiary and transferee in the transfer of independent guarantee are discussed respectively.Furthermore, from theory to practice, this paper analyzes the transfer of independent guarantee in Forfaiting business and the complexity of independent guarantee transfer in Forfaiting business.Finally, with the theory to guide the practice, through combing our country's legislative and judicial level to the independent guarantee system's attitude,It is clear that our country should recognize the existence of independent guarantee system from the legal interpretation and inherent logical inheritance relationship of Article 5, paragraph 1, of the guarantee Law.Combined with the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on the trial of several issues concerning the dispute cases of independent guarantee (draft of soliciting opinions), this paper puts forward a reasonable construction of the transfer system of independent guarantee in our country, and clarifies the legal application of the transfer of independent guarantee at home and abroad.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;D923;D922.295

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 白彥;獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度探析[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年02期

2 劉斌;;論我國(guó)獨(dú)立擔(dān)保制度的理論基礎(chǔ)和規(guī)則構(gòu)建[J];研究生法學(xué);2010年06期

3 曹士兵;中國(guó)擔(dān)保法律環(huán)境評(píng)論[J];法律適用;2004年06期

4 賀連博;論福費(fèi)廷的性質(zhì)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年03期

5 闕莉娜;關(guān)于“福費(fèi)庭”融資的若干法律問(wèn)題分析[J];法學(xué);2003年11期

6 詹朋朋;;獨(dú)立保函轉(zhuǎn)讓中的若干法律問(wèn)題[J];法學(xué);2007年05期

7 于瑩;潘林;;概念抑或類型——雷維斯案界分本票與證券的啟示[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

8 郭德香;;見(jiàn)索即付保函的擔(dān)保風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及其防控對(duì)策——由“利比亞銀行保函延期事件”引發(fā)的思考[J];法商研究;2012年05期

9 李世剛;;安慰函制度的法國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)及其啟示[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年09期

10 陳立虎;;獨(dú)立擔(dān)保國(guó)際慣例的新規(guī)則:URDG758[J];法治研究;2014年01期

本文編號(hào)：1709358