本文選題：不循規(guī)旅客　切入點：東京公約　出處：《中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院學(xué)報》2014年04期

【摘要】：隨著不循規(guī)旅客事件的不斷增加,國際航空界要求加強依法懲處不循規(guī)旅客的呼聲也日益增強。同《海牙公約》和《蒙特利爾公約》相比,《東京公約》是最適宜調(diào)整不循規(guī)乘客處罰的國際條約。但是,面對不循規(guī)旅客事件的新發(fā)展,《東京公約》也暴露出對"犯罪"和"行為"缺乏清晰定義,"飛行中"區(qū)間界定導(dǎo)致管轄期間出現(xiàn)空白,主權(quán)國家管轄權(quán)漏洞,以及引渡條款缺失等瑕疵,不能有效規(guī)制不循規(guī)乘客。鑒于此,國際社會應(yīng)當(dāng)從設(shè)立犯罪和不循規(guī)行為清單,對"飛行中"做出同其他公約相一致的定義,擴大管轄權(quán)基礎(chǔ),補充有關(guān)移交和引渡的規(guī)定等方面對《東京公約》進行現(xiàn)代化。
[Abstract]:With the increasing number of irregular passenger incidents, the international aviation industry calls for strengthening the punishment of irregular passengers according to the law.Compared with the Hague Convention and the Montreal Convention, the Tokyo Convention is the most suitable international treaty to adjust the penalty for irregular passengers.However, in the face of new developments in irregular passenger incidents, the Tokyo Convention has also revealed a lack of clear definitions of "crime" and "conduct". The definition of "in-flight" zones leads to gaps in the jurisdictional period and loopholes in sovereign national jurisdiction.As well as the absence of extradition provisions and other defects, can not effectively regulate irregular passengers.In view of this, the international community should expand its jurisdictional base by establishing a list of crimes and acts of non-compliance, with a definition of "in flight" consistent with other conventions,To modernize the Tokyo Convention by supplementing the provisions on surrender and extradition.
【作者單位】： 國家空管法規(guī)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究中心;北京航空航天大學(xué)航空法律和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究所;北京航空航天大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D993.4;D997.9

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉浩;;民用航空器上不循規(guī)旅客處罰比較研究[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2014年03期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1709362