本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：知識產(chǎn)品　出處：《湖南社會科學(xué)》2016年05期

【摘要】：文章對"知識產(chǎn)權(quán)"的內(nèi)在特質(zhì)進(jìn)行分析,全面地指出了知識產(chǎn)權(quán)自身存在的矛盾,即知識產(chǎn)權(quán)與公共利益的沖突,知識產(chǎn)品本身的非排他性與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)壟斷的排他性之間的矛盾,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)個人享受與知識產(chǎn)權(quán)責(zé)任社會承擔(dān)之間的矛盾,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)對知識發(fā)展兼具激勵性和抑制性的沖突,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利的享有的表象與資本控制和壟斷知識資源的本質(zhì)的矛盾,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)權(quán)利和義務(wù)的懸殊不對等的紕漏,知識的創(chuàng)造者與知識的利用者的分離的隱患,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)中的國家權(quán)力與私人權(quán)利并行的本質(zhì),知識的主觀性與相對客觀性的矛盾以及無限性與相對有限性的矛盾,知識產(chǎn)權(quán)交易價格的隨意性和壟斷性的危害等。知識產(chǎn)權(quán)自身的這些隱性矛盾可能會造成對知識產(chǎn)權(quán)正當(dāng)性的質(zhì)疑或知識產(chǎn)權(quán)性質(zhì)及保護(hù)的再定位,文章并不對這些矛盾提供現(xiàn)實(shí)的解決方案,只是作出提醒,只有正確對待這些矛盾,才能更好地完善中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)制度。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the inherent characteristics of "intellectual property", and points out the contradiction of intellectual property itself, that is, the conflict between intellectual property and public interest. The contradiction between the non-exclusiveness of intellectual product itself and the monopoly of intellectual property, the contradiction between individual enjoyment of intellectual property and the social responsibility of intellectual property, and the conflict between intellectual property rights and knowledge development is both encouraging and restraining. The contradiction between the representation of intellectual property rights and capital control and monopoly of knowledge resources, the disparity between intellectual property rights and obligations, the hidden danger of separation between the creator of knowledge and the users of knowledge, The essence of state power and private right in intellectual property, the contradiction between subjectivity and relative objectivity of knowledge, and the contradiction between infinity and finiteness, The arbitrariness of intellectual property transaction price and the harm of monopoly, etc. These hidden contradictions of intellectual property rights themselves may lead to questioning the legitimacy of intellectual property rights or repositioning the nature and protection of intellectual property rights. The article does not provide a realistic solution to these contradictions. It is only a reminder that only by correctly treating these contradictions can China's intellectual property system be better perfected.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué);
【基金】：《后TRIPS時代“中國品格”知識產(chǎn)權(quán)文化的重構(gòu)——立基于知識產(chǎn)權(quán)本質(zhì)的法哲學(xué)透視》(項(xiàng)目編號:13YJC820120),2013年教育部人文社會科學(xué)青年基金項(xiàng)目 《從國家立法到全民守法——中國后轉(zhuǎn)型期法治發(fā)展的轉(zhuǎn)向》(項(xiàng)目編號:2015XQN01),2015年度上海政法學(xué)院青年科研基金項(xiàng)目(第五批)
【分類號】：D997.1
，

本文編號：1679374