發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-20 17:35

  本文選題：跨境追逃追贓　切入點(diǎn)：國(guó)際合作　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)各國(guó)越來(lái)越意識(shí)到腐敗問(wèn)題的嚴(yán)重性,而由于科學(xué)技術(shù)的高速發(fā)展使得信息的交流更加便捷,資金的流動(dòng)也更加頻繁,從而使各國(guó)處理自己國(guó)內(nèi)的腐敗案件時(shí)也不得不考慮一些國(guó)際性的問(wèn)題。而在腐敗案件調(diào)查的各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié),都需要各個(gè)國(guó)家之間進(jìn)行合作,尤其是在反腐敗的關(guān)鍵步驟——跨境追逃追贓的過(guò)程,更需要各個(gè)國(guó)家之間相互配合。因此,正是在這一經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)的背景下,反腐敗從一國(guó)的國(guó)內(nèi)問(wèn)題上升為國(guó)際社會(huì)所共同面對(duì)的問(wèn)題,各個(gè)國(guó)家也在聯(lián)合國(guó)的框架內(nèi)達(dá)成了一些國(guó)際協(xié)議,并使其迅速生效,從而表達(dá)了各國(guó)在共同抗擊反腐敗問(wèn)題上的一致性。然而,盡管各國(guó)在反腐敗問(wèn)題上達(dá)成了主觀意愿上的一致性,但在許多環(huán)節(jié),尤其是跨境追逃追贓的環(huán)節(jié),許多實(shí)際案例表明,各國(guó)并沒(méi)有進(jìn)行應(yīng)有的相互合作。盡管跨境追逃追贓是反腐敗過(guò)程的最后一個(gè)步驟,卻是甚為關(guān)鍵的步驟,因?yàn)樗苯雨P(guān)系到反腐敗的最終效果,關(guān)系到反腐敗案件是否獲得了具有實(shí)質(zhì)意義的成功。就中國(guó)而言,隨著我國(guó)打擊腐敗犯罪力度的加大,貪官外逃和腐敗資金外流問(wèn)題成為我國(guó)腐敗犯罪的新特點(diǎn),打擊此類犯罪也成為我國(guó)反腐敗工作的新重心�！堵�(lián)合國(guó)反腐敗公約》的出臺(tái)填補(bǔ)了國(guó)際法在相關(guān)領(lǐng)域上的空白,不僅體現(xiàn)了國(guó)際社會(huì)治理腐敗的共同意愿和決心,也為國(guó)際社會(huì)聯(lián)合反腐敗斗爭(zhēng)提供了基本的法律指南和行動(dòng)準(zhǔn)則,是國(guó)際社會(huì)治理腐敗犯罪的法律基石。但是,現(xiàn)有的反腐敗國(guó)際合作機(jī)制仍然存在不少問(wèn)題和不足之處,還是任重道遠(yuǎn)。因此,我們需要回顧反腐敗國(guó)際合作的發(fā)展和實(shí)踐,并展望今后反腐敗國(guó)際合作的發(fā)展方向,為我國(guó)更好地實(shí)現(xiàn)跨境追逃追贓掃清障礙。文章采用比較分析的方法,通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)外及國(guó)際通行做法的闡述和比較,尋求差異并提出相應(yīng)對(duì)策。創(chuàng)新之處在于在視角上立足中國(guó),放眼全球,以國(guó)內(nèi)國(guó)外兩個(gè)領(lǐng)域?yàn)榭臻g范圍,既分析國(guó)內(nèi)的現(xiàn)狀,又研究國(guó)際制度,還參照其他國(guó)家或地區(qū)的制度與做法。既有理論觀點(diǎn),又有實(shí)踐例證,還有可借鑒的國(guó)際上新形成的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和觀點(diǎn)。文章共分為三章,由以下部分組成:第一章是關(guān)于跨境追逃追贓的基本概念和內(nèi)容,從法律和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)層面對(duì)當(dāng)前國(guó)際社會(huì)及我國(guó)追逃追贓的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行了總結(jié)與概括,并闡述了《聯(lián)合國(guó)反腐敗公約》的貫徹實(shí)施對(duì)實(shí)現(xiàn)跨境追逃追贓的重要意義。第二章通過(guò)歸納,對(duì)比分析了當(dāng)前國(guó)際社會(huì)與我國(guó)在開(kāi)展追逃追贓的過(guò)程中所面臨的問(wèn)題,從一些國(guó)家和地區(qū)所特有的問(wèn)題到國(guó)際社會(huì)所普遍存在的政治和現(xiàn)實(shí)障礙,進(jìn)而研究我國(guó)在此實(shí)踐中所面臨的問(wèn)題,主要從經(jīng)濟(jì)、法律、外交這三個(gè)因素分析,并為引出第三章做鋪墊。第三章是文章的重點(diǎn)部分,針對(duì)前文所提到的種種問(wèn)題提出了包括預(yù)防、司法、執(zhí)法、外交等方面的建議。這些建議既有宏觀方面的,包括推進(jìn)法律制度建設(shè)、加強(qiáng)與各國(guó)間的偵查合作與交流、拓展國(guó)際偵查合作領(lǐng)域;也有微觀方面的,主要是針對(duì)境外追逃與追贓機(jī)制提出的一些改進(jìn)思路。
[Abstract]:In recent years, more and more countries are aware of the seriousness of the problem of corruption, but due to the rapid development of science and technology makes information exchange more convenient, the flow of funds is more frequent, so that countries with their own domestic corruption cases also have to consider some international issues. All aspects of investigation in the case of corruption, all the need for cooperation between countries, especially in key steps of anti-corruption of the cross-border pursuit ZhuiZang, more need to cooperate with each other between each country. Therefore, it is in this economic context, anti-corruption rise from the domestic problems in a country for the international community in the face of common problems, each country some international agreements reached within the framework of the United Nations, and make its rapid entry into force, thus expressing the consistency of all the countries in the common fight against anti-corruption issues. However, although countries in The anti-corruption issue reached a consensus of the subjective intention, but in many areas, especially in cross-border pursuit ZhuiZang link, that many practical cases, countries and no mutual cooperation should be. Although cross-border pursuit ZhuiZang is the last step in the process of anti-corruption, it is very important step, because it directly related to the final effect of anti-corruption, anti-corruption cases related to whether obtain meaningful success. Chinese, with the increase of our fight against corruption crime, corruption and corrupt outflows become a new characteristic of corruption crime in our country, to combat such crime has also become a new anti-corruption work in China Center of gravity. The United Nations Anti-corruption Convention "introduced to fill the gaps in international law in related fields, not only reflects the common aspirations and determination of the international community to curb corruption, but also for the international community The united struggle of anti-corruption provides basic legal guidelines and criteria, is the cornerstone of the international legal social governance of corruption crime. However, the existing international anti-corruption cooperation mechanism there are still many problems and shortcomings, still has a long way to go. Therefore, we need to review the development and practice of international cooperation in anti-corruption, and the prospect of the future development direction of the anti the corruption of international cooperation, for our country to achieve better obstacles. The cross-border pursuit ZhuiZang adopts the method of comparative analysis, through the description and comparison of domestic and international practices, seek the difference and put forward the corresponding countermeasures. Innovation lies in the angle of view based on the China, looking at the world, with two fields at home and abroad for the spatial range, both the analysis of the domestic and international research status, system, system and practice also refer to other countries or regions. Both theoretical and practical point of view, example, The formation of new experiences and perspectives on international and reference. The article is divided into three chapters, consists of the following parts: the first chapter is the basic concept and content of cross-border pursuit ZhuiZang, and generalizes the current situation of the international community and our pursuit ZhuiZang from the law and practice of the two layer, and describes the "the significance of the United Nations Convention on the implementation of anti-corruption to achieve cross-border pursuit ZhuiZang. In the second chapter, through the induction, comparative analysis of the current international society and China is facing in the process of carrying out the pursuit ZhuiZang problems in the peculiar problems from some countries and regions to the prevailing international political and social and then study the realistic obstacles facing China in practice, mainly from the economic and legal analysis, the three factors of diplomacy, and pave the way for the third chapter. The third chapter is the key part of the article, according to the The problems mentioned above are put forward including prevention, judicial, law enforcement, diplomatic and other aspects. These suggestions include macro aspects, including promoting the construction of the legal system, strengthen investigation and cooperation and communication between countries, expand international cooperation in the field of investigation; there are micro aspects, is mainly based on the pursuit of overseas ZhuiZang and mechanism of some improvement ideas.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D997.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 黃風(fēng);;國(guó)際引渡合作規(guī)則的新發(fā)展[J];比較法研究;2006年03期

2 李昌道;;《聯(lián)合國(guó)反腐敗公約》解析[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

3 陳結(jié)淼;;《聯(lián)合國(guó)反腐敗公約》框架下我國(guó)反腐敗國(guó)際合作機(jī)制的構(gòu)建與完善[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2007年05期

4 李宗禮;;腐敗犯罪跨國(guó)跨境追贓問(wèn)題研究[J];河北科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

5 劉志偉;魏昌東;錢小平;;中國(guó)貫徹《聯(lián)合國(guó)反腐敗公約》的措施[J];南都學(xué)壇;2011年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 譚超;國(guó)際法上腐敗資產(chǎn)追回與返還機(jī)制研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

2 梅青葉;《聯(lián)合國(guó)反腐敗公約》中引渡機(jī)制探析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

3 李浩;構(gòu)建我國(guó)腐敗預(yù)防體系的思考[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1640111