本文選題：中國產(chǎn)品　切入點：歐盟反傾銷法　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：作為中國最大的貿(mào)易伙伴，歐盟在與中國經(jīng)濟交往的過程中，為了保護其成員國的利益，頻繁對中國產(chǎn)品發(fā)起反傾銷調(diào)查。本文針對WTO中的歐盟對華皮鞋征收反傾銷稅案進行研究，以期從法律層面為中國政府與企業(yè)有效應(yīng)對歐盟反傾銷措施提出對策、建議，保障中國對外貿(mào)易健康、正常發(fā)展，維護國家貿(mào)易利益。 本文共分為四部分。 第一部分是歐盟對華皮鞋反傾銷案的案由和基本案情的介紹。 第二部分是本案的法律爭議焦點及其研究。本案的爭議焦點主要包含：傾銷的確定、對中國企業(yè)市場經(jīng)濟地位的判定、歐盟反傾銷法“共同體利益”條款的適用、關(guān)于確定巴西為替代國、歐盟認定中國產(chǎn)品構(gòu)成傾銷的相關(guān)程序規(guī)則的合理性。 第三部分是中國應(yīng)對歐盟反傾銷的措施。分析了歐盟對華反傾銷的依據(jù)和本案的影響，提出了中國應(yīng)對歐盟對華反傾銷的若干措施。主要包括中國政府和中國企業(yè)兩個方面。從政府角度，，應(yīng)積極利用世貿(mào)組織爭端解決機制來保護本國利益；注意加強與歐盟間相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的談判；同時加強對歐盟產(chǎn)品采取兩反一保措施。從企業(yè)角度，應(yīng)當(dāng)積極應(yīng)訴，主動利用歐盟自身的法律渠道維護企業(yè)的合法權(quán)益。 第四部分是研究結(jié)論，總結(jié)了中國政府以及企業(yè)針對類似案件，如何來維護自身的合法權(quán)益，以期為應(yīng)對此類案件提供有益的借鑒。
[Abstract]:As China's biggest trading partner in EU and Chinese economic exchanges in the process, in order to protect the interests of Member States, frequent anti-dumping investigation to Chinese products. According to WTO in the EU anti-dumping case of leather shoes, in order from the legal level for Chinese government and enterprises to effectively deal with the EU the anti-dumping measures put forward countermeasures and suggestions, guarantee Chinese foreign trade healthy and normal development, safeguarding national interests of trade.
This article is divided into four parts.
The first part is the EU anti-dumping case of action and the introduction of the basic facts.
The second part is the case study. The focus of legal disputes and the focus of controversy in this case mainly includes: the determination of dumping, to determine the status of market economy China enterprises, application of EU anti-dumping law "community interest" clause, on the determination of the country of Brazil as an alternative, the rationality of the relevant rules of procedure to identify China EU dumping products.
The third part is the China deal with the EU anti-dumping measures. Analysis of the impact of the EU anti-dumping on the basis of the case, put forward Chinese deal with the EU anti-dumping measures. Two aspects including Chinese government and China enterprises. From the perspective of the government, should actively use the WTO to protect its interests dispute settlement mechanism; pay attention to strengthening the relevant areas of negotiations with the European Union; at the same time strengthen two anti conservation measures on EU products. From the angle of enterprises, should actively respond to the EU's own initiative to use legal channels to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises.
The fourth part is the conclusion of the study. It summarizes how the Chinese government and enterprises maintain their legitimate rights and interests for similar cases, in order to provide useful references for such cases.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 李成斌;對反傾銷措施的司法審查制度[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報);2002年08期

2 王磊;更深層次的貿(mào)易保護——歐盟對華產(chǎn)品反傾銷20年[J];國際貿(mào)易;2000年11期

3 范麗娜,姬明發(fā);歐盟反傾銷法對華的不公正表現(xiàn)及對策[J];經(jīng)濟論壇;2003年02期

4 楊仕輝,王紅玲,葉紅春;歐盟對華反傾銷比較及我國對策研究[J];歐洲;2002年03期

5 陳力;歐盟對華反傾銷“非市場經(jīng)濟”問題探析[J];歐洲研究;2003年03期

6 陳凌;歐盟反傾銷法探析[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2004年01期

7 方小敏;論歐共體對反傾銷措施的司法審查制度[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2003年03期

8 陶景洲;再看反傾銷——中國企業(yè)反傾銷應(yīng)訴的深層思考[J];中國律師;2001年02期

9 朱慶華;反傾銷中的公共利益問題[J];中央財經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年01期

本文編號：1640110