本文選題：南海　切入點(diǎn)：油氣資源　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自2009年2月以來(lái),南海局勢(shì)驟然緊張,東南亞國(guó)家紛紛采取行動(dòng),打破了南海上長(zhǎng)久以來(lái)的平靜。2月17日,菲律賓國(guó)會(huì)通過(guò)了“領(lǐng)�；�法案”,把我國(guó)的黃巖島和南沙群島部分島礁劃分為菲律賓領(lǐng)土;5月6日,馬來(lái)西亞同越南聯(lián)合向聯(lián)合國(guó)大陸架界限委員會(huì),提交了他們各自在南海南部的200海里外大陸架“劃界案”;5月7日,越南又單獨(dú)提交了南海中部部分地區(qū)的外大陸架“劃界案”。1南海各國(guó)近期的行動(dòng)主要是出于大陸架劃界的最后期限將至所致。然而究其根本原因則是對(duì)南海豐富的油氣資源的吸引。南海除具備優(yōu)越的地理位置,其石油、天然氣等礦產(chǎn)資源豐富,堪稱“小波斯灣”。當(dāng)今世界石油的儲(chǔ)量已經(jīng)成為衡量一國(guó)的重要指標(biāo),擁有油氣資源可以促進(jìn)本國(guó)的經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng),改善社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況,提升一國(guó)的綜合國(guó)力,因此各國(guó)已紛紛把戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)定在進(jìn)一步對(duì)油氣的勘探開(kāi)發(fā)上。然而南海由于特殊的地理、歷史、法律等原因,導(dǎo)致存在各國(guó)各占一方的局面,資源未能充分開(kāi)發(fā)利用,因此研究南海油氣田勘探開(kāi)發(fā)的法律問(wèn)題具備現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和理論意義。 全文結(jié)合國(guó)際法的理論與實(shí)踐對(duì)南海油氣田開(kāi)發(fā)的法律問(wèn)題進(jìn)行分析,主體分為五個(gè)部分:作為題引第一部分闡述了南海油氣資源勘探現(xiàn)狀,分別列舉了馬來(lái)西亞、印度尼西亞、文萊、越南、菲律賓和中國(guó)對(duì)南海油氣田開(kāi)發(fā)情況。 第二部分詳盡介紹了南海油氣田開(kāi)發(fā)的法律基礎(chǔ),對(duì)大陸架制度、沿海國(guó)在大陸架的主權(quán)權(quán)利進(jìn)行闡述,概括說(shuō)明大陸架與專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)的關(guān)系,同時(shí)闡釋了大陸架劃界的基本原則——公平原則,大陸架劃界與共同開(kāi)發(fā)的關(guān)系。 第三部分重點(diǎn)介紹南海油氣田開(kāi)發(fā)與共同開(kāi)發(fā)制度,南海油氣資源勘探開(kāi)發(fā)有多種解決方案,通過(guò)分析共同開(kāi)發(fā)是最切實(shí)可行的,結(jié)合南海的現(xiàn)狀更適合于重疊海域的共同開(kāi)發(fā)這一類型;同時(shí)探討了共同開(kāi)發(fā)的法律特征與法律地位,從政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、法律和社會(huì)文化四個(gè)方面綜合剖析了南海油氣田共同開(kāi)發(fā)的影響因素,以便促成共同開(kāi)發(fā)的順利開(kāi)展。 第四部分則從海洋油氣田共同開(kāi)發(fā)的國(guó)際實(shí)踐著手,用三個(gè)具體案例再次論證共同開(kāi)發(fā)的必要性與可行性。成功的國(guó)際實(shí)踐給南海進(jìn)行共同開(kāi)發(fā)提供最有價(jià)值的參考文本。 第五部分歸納了南海周邊國(guó)家提出解決南海問(wèn)題的方案,整理近些年來(lái)南海周邊國(guó)家共同開(kāi)發(fā)的進(jìn)展,例如中菲、中越、中印尼的談判進(jìn)程,通過(guò)比較分析總結(jié)出:南海油氣資源共同開(kāi)發(fā)應(yīng)解決的問(wèn)題,即共同開(kāi)發(fā)區(qū)的選擇、共同開(kāi)發(fā)的主體、共同開(kāi)發(fā)的項(xiàng)目。南海油氣田共同開(kāi)發(fā)任重而道遠(yuǎn),需要南海各方的共同努力。
[Abstract]:Since February 2009, tensions have erupted in the South China Sea, and Southeast Asian countries have taken action to break the long-held calm in the South China Sea. February 17th, The Philippine Congress passed the baseline Act for the Territorial Sea, which divides our Huangyan Island and some of the Nansha Islands islands into Philippine territory; in May 6th, Malaysia and Viet Nam jointly submitted to the United Nations Commission on the limits of the Continental Shelf, Made their respective "submission" on the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles in the southern part of the South China Sea; on May 7th, Viet Nam has also made separate "submissions" on the outer continental shelf in parts of the central South China Sea..1 recent actions by the South China Sea countries are mainly due to the approaching deadline for the delimitation of the continental shelf. However, the root cause is the abundance of the South China Sea. The South China Sea, in addition to its superior geographical location, It is rich in oil, natural gas and other mineral resources, and can be called the "Little Persian Gulf." the oil reserves of the world today have become an important indicator of a country. Having oil and gas resources can promote the country's economic growth and improve its social and economic situation. As a result of improving a country's comprehensive national strength, all countries have set their strategic objectives on further exploration and development of oil and gas. However, due to special geographical, historical, legal and other reasons, the South China Sea has a situation in which each country occupies one side. Therefore, it is of practical and theoretical significance to study the legal problems of oil and gas field exploration and development in the South China Sea. Based on the theory and practice of international law, this paper analyzes the legal problems of oil and gas field development in the South China Sea. The main body is divided into five parts: as the first part, the present situation of oil and gas resources exploration in the South China Sea is expounded, and Malaysia is listed respectively. Development of South China Sea oil and gas fields in Indonesia, Brunei, Vietnam, Philippines and China. The second part introduces in detail the legal basis of oil and gas field development in the South China Sea, expounds the system of continental shelf and the sovereign rights of coastal States in the continental shelf, and generalizes the relationship between continental shelf and exclusive economic zone. At the same time, it explains the basic principle of continental shelf delimitation-equity principle, and the relationship between continental shelf delimitation and joint development. The third part focuses on the South China Sea oil and gas field development and joint development system, the South China Sea oil and gas resources exploration and development has a variety of solutions, through the analysis of joint development is the most feasible. Combined with the present situation of the South China Sea, it is more suitable for the joint development of overlapping sea areas. At the same time, it discusses the legal characteristics and legal status of joint development, from the political and economic aspects, Four aspects of law and social culture comprehensively analyzed the influence factors of the joint development of the South China Sea oil and gas fields in order to promote the smooth development of the joint development. The 4th part starts with the international practice of joint development of offshore oil and gas fields and proves the necessity and feasibility of joint development with three concrete cases. The successful international practice provides the most valuable reference text for the joint development of the South China Sea. In the 5th part, the author summarizes the plans proposed by the neighboring countries in the South China Sea to solve the South China Sea problem, and collates the progress of joint development of the neighboring countries in the South China Sea in recent years, such as the negotiation process between China and the Philippines, China and Vietnam, and China and. Through comparative analysis, it is concluded that the problems to be solved in the joint development of oil and gas resources in the South China Sea, namely, the selection of common development zones, the main body of joint development, and the joint development projects, the joint development of oil and gas fields in the South China Sea has a long way to go. It needs the joint efforts of all parties in the South China Sea.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D993.5

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 溫耀原;;國(guó)際法視野下共同開(kāi)發(fā)南海的法律問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年10期

2 許浩;楊樂(lè);;共同開(kāi)發(fā)理論與案例綜述及南海發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì)研判[J];海南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 葉雷;東海與南海油氣資源共同開(kāi)發(fā)的比較研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1630112