發(fā)布時間：2018-03-15 11:07

  本文選題：私人軍事公司　切入點：國際法律地位　出處：《華東理工大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：私有軍事服務自從戰(zhàn)爭產(chǎn)生之日起便有了萌芽,并且隨著歷史的演進不斷的發(fā)展。近年來,關于PMC在履行合同的過程中不法行為的報道引發(fā)了人們對此問題的極大關注。二戰(zhàn)以來出現(xiàn)的越來越多的PMC使得原來的國際公約措手不及,至今也尚未形成直接針對PMC的、具有普遍約束力的法律文件。PMC的發(fā)展仍然持續(xù)進行,而PMC在國際人道主義法上處于一個灰色地帶,因為國際法上并沒有對他們有任何明確的規(guī)定。PMC的國際法律規(guī)制的空缺,將給國際人權和國際和平帶來了極大的威脅。而要明確誰應為武裝沖突中PMC雇員的行為負責,首先必須要明確武裝沖突中PMC雇員的國際法律地位。也就是,按照現(xiàn)行的國際武裝沖突法,就必須考慮PMC雇員是為平民還是戰(zhàn)斗員。在提供合同軍事服務中具有平民地位的PMC就應該為其違反國際法的行為負責,而承擔個人的國際刑事責任。在這種情況下,可視為PMC的行為是通過合同、被授權行使政府權力要素的其他實體的行為,因此其行為也是可歸屬于國家的行為,國家就應該為其違反國際法的行為承擔國家責任。而提供合同軍事服務的PMC有少數(shù)因符合“其他民兵或其他志愿部隊”的條件而具有戰(zhàn)斗員的地位時國家更應該為這些具有戰(zhàn)斗員法律地位的PMC的違反國際法的行為負責。另外,按照現(xiàn)行國際法,PMC母國也有義務對其本國的PMC進行監(jiān)管和規(guī)范,當其監(jiān)管或者規(guī)制缺失而出現(xiàn)PMC違反國際法時,PMC母國也應該為此承擔國家責任。
[Abstract]:Private military services have sprouted since the day of the war, and have continued to evolve with the evolution of history. The report on the illegal behavior of PMC in the course of performing the contract has aroused great concern about this problem. Since World War II, more and more PMC have caught the original international conventions by surprise and have not yet been directly targeted at PMC. The development of a universally binding legal document, .PMC, is still ongoing, and PMC is in a grey area of international humanitarian law, because there is no explicit provision for them in international law. Will pose a great threat to international human rights and international peace. And to know who is responsible for the actions of PMC employees in armed conflict, we must first clarify the international legal status of PMC employees in armed conflict. Under the current law of international armed conflict, it is necessary to consider whether PMC employees are civilians or combatants. PMC, who has civilian status in the provision of contracted military services, is responsible for violations of international law. And the international criminal responsibility of individuals... in this case, the conduct that can be regarded as PMC is an act of other entities authorized to exercise elements of governmental authority through a contract, and therefore its conduct is also an act attributable to the State, States should be held responsible for their violations of international law. A small number of PMC, which provide contracted military services, have the status of combatants because they meet the requirements of "other militias or other voluntary forces". Responsible for these violations of international law by PMC, who has legal status as a combatant. According to the current international law, the home country also has the obligation to supervise and regulate the PMC in its own country. When the PMC is in breach of international law due to its lack of supervision or regulation, the home country should also bear the national responsibility for this.
【學位授予單位】：華東理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D995

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 唐小松;楊柳;;論當代雇傭軍的發(fā)展原因及其功能引導[J];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學學報;2007年06期

2 王宏偉;私人軍事公司的興起原因及發(fā)展前景[J];國際論壇;2005年03期

3 閻文虎;論國外雇傭軍對我國安全的影響[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治論壇;2002年04期

4 王秀梅;;私營軍事公司及其國際規(guī)制問題初探[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2009年04期

5 宋世鋒;;私人軍事和安全公司的國際法地位述評[J];探索與爭鳴;2009年03期

6 朱文奇;;雇傭軍問題對國際人道法的沖擊及影響[J];西安政治學院學報;2008年05期

7 詹世明;塞拉利昂內(nèi)戰(zhàn)中的外國雇傭軍[J];西亞非洲;2003年04期

，

本文編號：1615762