島嶼與巖礁的法律要件論析——以沖之鳥(niǎo)問(wèn)題為研究視角
本文選題:島嶼制度 切入點(diǎn):法律要件 出處:《政治與法律》2010年12期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:日本向大陸架界限委員會(huì)提交了以沖之鳥(niǎo)為基點(diǎn)的外大陸架劃界案,企圖視沖之鳥(niǎo)為島嶼,并試圖以沖之鳥(niǎo)為基點(diǎn)主張專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)和大陸架,從而在國(guó)際社會(huì)引發(fā)了對(duì)海洋法島嶼制度中的島嶼和巖礁的法律地位的爭(zhēng)議。日本的這一行為,割裂了《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》第121條三款之間的關(guān)系。日本的這種立場(chǎng)和做法,違背了該公約第121條規(guī)定的宗旨,機(jī)械地解釋公約第121條三款的規(guī)定,使該條規(guī)定失去了總體的規(guī)范作用。通過(guò)對(duì)島嶼制度的結(jié)構(gòu)、成型過(guò)程和立法宗旨的考察可以發(fā)現(xiàn),島嶼制度條款應(yīng)整體看待,不可割裂,《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》第121條中的三款應(yīng)作整體理解,第1款規(guī)定了島嶼的廣義概念,第2款是關(guān)于狹義島嶼的規(guī)定,第3款規(guī)定了例外的島嶼,是對(duì)第2款的進(jìn)一步解釋和適用上的制約性規(guī)定;同時(shí),巖礁是島嶼的一種特別形態(tài),也應(yīng)滿足島嶼的所有要件。
[Abstract]:Japan has submitted to the Commission on the limits of the Continental Shelf a submission on the outer continental shelf, based on the bird of rush, in an attempt to treat the bird as an island and to claim the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf on the basis of the bird of rush. Thus, in the international community, disputes have arisen over the legal status of islands and reefs in the regime of islands of the law of the sea... this act of Japan has severed the relationship between article 121, paragraph 3, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea... this position and practice of Japan, Contrary to the purposes set forth in article 121 of the Convention, the mechanical interpretation of the provisions of article 121 of the Convention deprives the provisions of that article of the general normative function. An examination of the structure, shaping process and legislative purpose of the island system reveals that, The provisions of the island regime should be viewed as a whole and not separated from each other, and the three paragraphs of article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea should be understood as a whole, paragraph 1 establishing the broad concept of the island and paragraph 2 concerning the narrow meaning of the island, The islands provided for in paragraph 3, which provided for exceptions, constituted a further interpretation and application of paragraph 2; at the same time, the reef was a special form of the island and should satisfy all the elements of the island.
【作者單位】: 上海社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所;
【分類號(hào)】:D993.5
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 符信新;;社會(huì)組織經(jīng)濟(jì)屬性探析[J];社團(tuán)管理研究;2011年08期
2 劉霞;;略論馬克思主義資本屬性理論[J];人民論壇;2011年20期
3 王玉林;;人性與人權(quán)的關(guān)系論綱[J];西南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年08期
4 廣敏;;珍惜生命中的單純——也說(shuō)“棱角”[J];人民政壇;2011年08期
5 胡孝四;;人性、市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)與科學(xué)發(fā)展觀[J];前沿;2011年16期
6 陳佑武;;論人權(quán)的人本內(nèi)涵[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期
7 朱宏霜;;道德主體知行轉(zhuǎn)化過(guò)程的社會(huì)屬性論析[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年09期
8 陳振航;;馬克思關(guān)于人的社會(huì)性的詮釋與再思考[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2011年07期
9 蔣馥蔚;;刑法謙抑思想之根據(jù)[J];前沿;2011年14期
10 劉茂z,
本文編號(hào):1613929
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/guojifa/1613929.html