本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：眾所周知,由于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的地域性特征,國(guó)際私法的理論和實(shí)踐領(lǐng)域長(zhǎng)期堅(jiān)持在沒(méi)有國(guó)際公約和雙邊互惠協(xié)定的情況下,只有注冊(cè)地法院才能對(duì)其地域范圍內(nèi)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛進(jìn)行管轄,一國(guó)法院無(wú)權(quán)對(duì)外國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件進(jìn)行管轄,由此便會(huì)造成大量的管轄權(quán)沖突。 而隨著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際化的不斷發(fā)展,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)經(jīng)歷從國(guó)內(nèi)到國(guó)際,從雙邊到多邊的歷程,其嚴(yán)格地域性特征已經(jīng)隨著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際協(xié)調(diào)制度的建立和發(fā)展以及各國(guó)國(guó)際私法立法的發(fā)展而逐漸弱化,甚至有所突破。 隨著知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛地域管轄原則的局限性日益明顯,固守該原則使得保護(hù)本國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)處于明顯不利狀態(tài)�；谠摼窒扌�,很多國(guó)家特別是在技術(shù)和貿(mào)易上處于優(yōu)勢(shì)地位的發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家,在突破知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)地域性管轄方面做了諸多嘗試,產(chǎn)生大量豐富的實(shí)踐。 因此隨著國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易交往的日益頻繁,嚴(yán)格的地域性在有限的范圍內(nèi)逐漸弱化,由于種種原因,知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法也像其他民事權(quán)利立法一樣具有域外效力。同時(shí)隨著各國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)交往的頻繁深入,各種知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛也隨之而起,在沒(méi)有雙邊協(xié)定和公約的前提下,管轄權(quán)沖突不可避免,所以如何解決這種跨國(guó)管轄權(quán)沖突已成為當(dāng)前理論和實(shí)踐中亟待解決的問(wèn)題。 本文對(duì)國(guó)際上知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛管轄權(quán)的國(guó)際私法立法和實(shí)踐作出了深入的探討,一共分為六章,前兩章主要就知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的特性以及管轄權(quán)沖突產(chǎn)生的原因作出闡述,第三章對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的管轄權(quán)制度進(jìn)行描述。本文重點(diǎn)在第四章,即管轄權(quán)制度在具體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件中的運(yùn)用,該章把糾紛案件分為三類:一是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)確權(quán)糾紛,著重討論的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的建立、效力以及所有權(quán)的管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題;二是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)合同糾紛,著重討論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)在許可和轉(zhuǎn)讓過(guò)程中的管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題;三是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的侵權(quán)糾紛,著重討論的是知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)遭受侵權(quán)后的管轄權(quán)問(wèn)題。該章通過(guò)各國(guó)在知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)各類案件上的實(shí)踐和立法作出了深入的剖析,對(duì)其特點(diǎn)和缺陷作出評(píng)析,并對(duì)具體的制度設(shè)計(jì)作出了構(gòu)架。第五章對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)管轄權(quán)制度的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)作出了描述,由于各國(guó)對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)管轄權(quán)制度的立法和實(shí)踐帶有某種趨勢(shì),這對(duì)于其精神的把握至關(guān)重要。第六章著重描述了對(duì)中國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)管轄權(quán)制度的現(xiàn)狀以及對(duì)中國(guó)的具體制度構(gòu)建提出具體的建議。 國(guó)際上管轄權(quán)沖突的理論和實(shí)踐問(wèn)題必然帶來(lái)隨之而來(lái)的是中國(guó)的立法問(wèn)題,由于中國(guó)對(duì)于知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛管轄權(quán)方面的立法缺乏完整的體系,望本文對(duì)中國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛管轄權(quán)國(guó)際私法立法有一定的借鑒作用。
[Abstract]:As we all know, due to the regional character of intellectual property rights, the theoretical and practical field of private international law has long persisted in the absence of international conventions and bilateral reciprocal agreements. Only the court in the place of registration can have jurisdiction over intellectual property disputes in its territory, and the courts of a country have no right to jurisdiction over intellectual property cases of foreign countries, which will result in a large number of conflicts of jurisdiction. With the continuous development of the internationalization of intellectual property, intellectual property protection has experienced the course from domestic to international, from bilateral to multilateral. With the establishment and development of the international coordination system of intellectual property rights and the development of the legislation of private international law, its strict regional character has gradually weakened and even made a breakthrough. As the limitations of the principle of territorial jurisdiction in intellectual property disputes become increasingly evident, adherence to the principle puts the protection of intellectual property in a state of obvious disadvantage. Many countries, especially the developed countries which have advantages in technology and trade, have made a lot of attempts to break through the regional jurisdiction of intellectual property, which has produced a great deal of rich practice. Therefore, with the increasing frequency of international economic and trade exchanges, strict regionalism is gradually weakened in a limited range, for various reasons. Intellectual property law has the same extraterritorial effect as other civil rights legislation. Meanwhile, with the frequent deepening of intellectual property exchanges in various countries, various intellectual property disputes also arise. Without bilateral agreements and conventions, Jurisdiction conflict is inevitable, so how to solve this kind of transnational jurisdiction conflict has become an urgent problem in current theory and practice. This paper makes a deep discussion on the legislation and practice of international private international law on the jurisdiction of intellectual property disputes, which is divided into six chapters. The first two chapters mainly elaborate on the characteristics of intellectual property and the causes of the conflicts of jurisdiction. The third chapter describes the jurisdiction system of intellectual property rights. This paper focuses on Chapter 4th, namely, the application of jurisdiction system in specific intellectual property cases, this chapter divides the dispute cases into three categories: first, the intellectual property right dispute, Focusing on the establishment, validity and jurisdiction of ownership of intellectual property rights; second, disputes over intellectual property rights contracts, focusing on the jurisdiction of intellectual property rights in the process of licensing and transfer; and third, infringement disputes over intellectual property rights, Focusing on the issue of jurisdiction after intellectual property rights have been infringed upon, this chapter makes an in-depth analysis of the practice and legislation of various types of intellectual property rights cases in various countries, and makes an assessment of its characteristics and shortcomings, The development trend of intellectual property jurisdiction system is described in Chapter 5th, because the legislation and practice of intellectual property jurisdiction system in various countries have a certain trend. This is of great importance to its spirit. Chapter 6th focuses on describing the current situation of China's intellectual property jurisdiction system and putting forward concrete suggestions on the construction of China's specific system. The theory and practice of the conflict of international jurisdiction will inevitably bring with it the problems of China's legislation. Because of the lack of a complete system of legislation on the jurisdiction of intellectual property disputes in China, Hope this article has certain reference function to Chinese intellectual property dispute jurisdiction international private law legislation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 鄭成思;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的國(guó)際保護(hù)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1997年03期

2 何艷;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際私法保護(hù)規(guī)則的新發(fā)展——《知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán):跨國(guó)糾紛管轄權(quán)、法律選擇和判決原則》述評(píng)及啟示[J];法商研究;2009年01期

3 馮術(shù)杰;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突規(guī)則的擬定——保護(hù)國(guó)法主義與分割論的結(jié)合適用[J];法學(xué);2005年03期

4 高琦;;國(guó)際私法領(lǐng)域中知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的法律沖突[J];廊坊師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

5 范海燕,劉文;對(duì)我國(guó)未來(lái)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際私法制度的設(shè)想[J];前沿;2004年06期

6 呂巖峰;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)之沖突法評(píng)論[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;1996年06期

7 姜茹嬌;從沖突法角度論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的國(guó)際保護(hù)[J];學(xué)術(shù)界;2005年04期

8 龐惠卿;從知識(shí)霸權(quán)現(xiàn)象反思我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)國(guó)際私法保護(hù)問(wèn)題[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

9 徐祥;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的地域性[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 高曉力;論國(guó)際私法上的公共政策之運(yùn)用[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2005年

2 張淑鈿;中國(guó)內(nèi)地與香港區(qū)際民商事案件管轄權(quán)沖突問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 侯永珍;論國(guó)際私法中的法院地法傾向[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2003年

2 王圣哲;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的沖突法探討[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

3 李婧;商標(biāo)的國(guó)際私法保護(hù)[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

4 劉薇;論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)沖突規(guī)范的制定[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

5 謝凱;論國(guó)際知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的法律沖突與法律適用[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

6 余暉;版權(quán)的地域性和域外效力[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1566104