本文選題：協(xié)議管轄　切入點(diǎn)：管轄協(xié)議　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：國(guó)際私法中的協(xié)議管轄制度,是國(guó)際民事訴訟中調(diào)和管轄沖突,確定訴訟管轄權(quán)的重要內(nèi)容之一。協(xié)議管轄是國(guó)際私法上的當(dāng)事人意思自治原則在國(guó)際民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)問題上的自然延伸和具體體現(xiàn),是確定管轄權(quán)歸屬的重要制度之一。國(guó)際私法中的協(xié)議管轄已經(jīng)成為現(xiàn)代國(guó)際社會(huì)中普遍接受的一項(xiàng)管轄原則,為世界上絕大多數(shù)國(guó)家接受和采納。目前世界上關(guān)于協(xié)議管轄的國(guó)際公約,受到廣泛好評(píng)的莫過于歐洲聯(lián)盟的《布魯塞爾公約》和《盧加諾公約》,它們以詳實(shí)的規(guī)定和廣泛的效力在協(xié)議管轄領(lǐng)域立法當(dāng)中處于遙遙領(lǐng)先的地位,在解決協(xié)議管轄問題上也成為諸多國(guó)家向往和參照的對(duì)象。布魯塞爾公約、盧加諾公約和布魯塞爾條例等歐盟通過的一系列公約、條例和指令共同構(gòu)成了布魯塞爾體系。布魯塞爾體系下協(xié)議管轄制度的立法內(nèi)容,為其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)提供了先進(jìn)的立法模式。協(xié)議管轄制度也隨著布魯塞爾體系的形成而不斷發(fā)展完善。本文在分析借鑒歐盟解決成員國(guó)間管轄權(quán)沖突方面的經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn),可為我國(guó)解決類似問題提供十分有益的參考。并結(jié)合我國(guó)的實(shí)際情況,提出一些建議,希望可以完善我國(guó)的涉外協(xié)議管轄制度。 從以上角度出發(fā),全文主要分四部分進(jìn)行闡述:首先,從協(xié)議管轄制度的產(chǎn)生入手,分析協(xié)議管轄制度的概念和理論基礎(chǔ),及協(xié)議管轄的效力所包含的內(nèi)容。這些是協(xié)議管轄制度的基礎(chǔ);其次,分析布魯塞爾體系的形成過程,介紹布魯塞爾體系中協(xié)議管轄制度的具體內(nèi)容,以及該制度在歐盟成員國(guó)的實(shí)施;第三,通過世界其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)的實(shí)踐,分析該制度對(duì)其他公約的影響,探討該制度的最新發(fā)展;最后,闡述布魯塞爾體系對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒意義并分析我國(guó)協(xié)議管轄制度的立法現(xiàn)狀,指出缺陷,提出完善修改的建議。
[Abstract]:The system of jurisdiction by agreement in private international law is to reconcile the conflict of jurisdiction in international civil proceedings. Agreement jurisdiction is the natural extension and concrete embodiment of the principle of party autonomy in private international law in international civil and commercial litigation jurisdiction. Agreement jurisdiction in private international law has become a universally accepted principle of jurisdiction in the modern international community, Accepted and adopted by the vast majority of countries in the world... the current international conventions on the jurisdiction of agreements in the world, Nothing more well received than the Brussels Convention and the Lugano Convention of the European Union, which, with their detailed provisions and extensive force, are well placed in the forefront of legislation in the area of agreement jurisdiction, It has also become the object of yearning and reference by many countries in resolving the issue of agreement jurisdiction. The Brussels Convention, the Lugano Convention and the Brussels regulations have been adopted by the European Union in a series of conventions. The regulations and directives together form the Brussels system. The legislative content of the agreed jurisdiction system under the Brussels system, It has provided advanced legislative model for other countries and regions. The system of agreement jurisdiction has also been developed and perfected with the formation of Brussels system. This paper analyzes and draws lessons from the EU's experience in resolving conflicts of jurisdiction among member states. It can provide a very useful reference for our country to solve similar problems. Combined with the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward some suggestions, hoping to perfect our country's foreign agreement jurisdiction system. From the above point of view, the full text is mainly divided into four parts: first, starting with the emergence of the agreement jurisdiction system, the concept and theoretical basis of the agreement jurisdiction system are analyzed. These are the basis of the agreement jurisdiction system. Secondly, the formation process of the Brussels system is analyzed, and the specific content of the agreement jurisdiction system in the Brussels system is introduced. And the implementation of the system in EU member States; third, through the practice of other countries and regions in the world, to analyze the impact of the system on other conventions, to explore the latest development of the system; finally, This paper expounds the reference significance of Brussels system to our country, analyzes on the present legislative situation of our country's agreement jurisdiction system, points out the defects, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect and amend it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王吉文;;我國(guó)批準(zhǔn)海牙《選擇法院協(xié)議公約》的必要性分析[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2009年01期

2 王克玉;;“布魯塞爾體系”和“海牙公約體系”下的正當(dāng)程序比較研究——基于外國(guó)判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行的目的[J];比較法研究;2009年03期

3 嚴(yán)紅;陳劍;;海牙《選擇法院協(xié)議公約》之防御性機(jī)制研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年02期

4 李薇薇;論《布魯塞爾公約》與外國(guó)民商事判決的承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行[J];中國(guó)司法;2000年05期

5 黃進(jìn);鄒國(guó)勇;;歐盟民商事管轄權(quán)規(guī)則的嬗變——從《布魯塞爾公約》到《布魯塞爾條例》[J];東岳論叢;2006年05期

6 奚曉明;論我國(guó)涉外民商事訴訟中協(xié)議管轄條款的認(rèn)定(上)[J];法律適用(國(guó)家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年03期

7 馮霞;論國(guó)際民商事訴訟中的協(xié)議管轄原則 兼評(píng)我國(guó)相關(guān)立法及立法建議[J];法律適用;2005年07期

8 朱萍;虛擬空間管轄權(quán)的確定——美國(guó)和歐盟實(shí)踐的啟示[J];法商研究;2002年04期

9 廖永安;;我國(guó)民事訴訟地域管轄制度之反思[J];法商研究;2006年02期

10 張?zhí)m蘭;國(guó)際民事訴訟協(xié)議管轄制度的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2000年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 肖靜;論布魯塞爾體系下的歐盟民商事管轄權(quán)[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1558560