本文關(guān)鍵詞： 專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū) 沿海國(guó) 非沿海國(guó) 平時(shí)軍事活動(dòng)　出處：《海南大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)(Exclusive Economic Zone,以下簡(jiǎn)稱EEZ)制度是《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱公約))的一大創(chuàng)舉,但《公約》是海洋大國(guó)與廣大發(fā)展中沿海國(guó)相互妥協(xié)的產(chǎn)物,因此存在眾多模糊之處,沿海國(guó)對(duì)其EEZ的外國(guó)平時(shí)海上軍事活動(dòng)的規(guī)制問(wèn)題就是其中之一。所以,對(duì)這類問(wèn)題的研究是有深遠(yuǎn)的理論意義和積極的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義的。 本文除前言和結(jié)語(yǔ)外,共分為五個(gè)部分： 一、概括論述平時(shí)軍事活動(dòng)的概念、分類。本文將研究對(duì)象界定在非沿海國(guó)的軍艦在沿海國(guó)的EEZ的平時(shí)軍事活動(dòng),主要探析沿海國(guó)對(duì)該區(qū)域的外國(guó)軍事活動(dòng)的規(guī)制問(wèn)題。 二、評(píng)析美國(guó)在我國(guó)EEZ進(jìn)行軍事活動(dòng)的法律依據(jù),包括EEZ是國(guó)際水域、進(jìn)行軍事活動(dòng)是航行自由和其他國(guó)際合法用途、測(cè)量活動(dòng)不是海洋科研以及美國(guó)不是《公約》締約國(guó)。 三、篩選出《公約》中的相關(guān)規(guī)定,并結(jié)合由第21專家組起草的《專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)航行和飛越指南》(以下簡(jiǎn)稱指南))對(duì)這些規(guī)定進(jìn)行評(píng)析,包括“和平利用海洋”、“禁止武力或以武力威脅”、“適當(dāng)顧及”、“權(quán)利濫用”和“剩余權(quán)利規(guī)則’原則。 四、列舉一些發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和發(fā)展中國(guó)家的相關(guān)實(shí)踐,包括澳大利亞的海事識(shí)別制度,日本、越南、印尼以及其他國(guó)家的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,以尋找沿海國(guó)規(guī)制其EEZ的軍事活動(dòng)的現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù)。 五、對(duì)我國(guó)規(guī)制EEZ內(nèi)的外國(guó)平時(shí)軍事活動(dòng)提出建議。包括對(duì)我國(guó)完善國(guó)內(nèi)立法和參與國(guó)際海洋事務(wù)的建議,以及為了及時(shí)應(yīng)對(duì)EEZ的軍事活動(dòng)的一些措施建議。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于,以《公約》為主線,在廣泛參閱《聯(lián)合國(guó)憲章》和《指南》的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合一系列國(guó)際法基本原則,充分駁斥了美國(guó)在我國(guó)EEZ進(jìn)行軍事活動(dòng)的法律依據(jù),系統(tǒng)地闡釋了沿海國(guó)規(guī)制在其EEZ的外國(guó)軍事活動(dòng)的國(guó)際法根據(jù),并對(duì)規(guī)制在我國(guó)EEZ內(nèi)的外國(guó)軍事活動(dòng)提出了諸多建議。
[Abstract]:Exclusive Economic one (hereafter referred to as EEZ) system is one of the innovations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (hereinafter referred to as the Convention), but the Convention is the product of mutual compromise between the major maritime powers and the vast number of developing coastal States, so there are many ambiguities. One of them is the regulation of foreign maritime military activities of EEZ by coastal states. Therefore, the study of this kind of problems is of profound theoretical significance and positive practical significance. In addition to the preface and conclusion, this paper is divided into five parts:. Firstly, the concept and classification of peacetime military activities are summarized. The object of study is defined as the peacetime military activities of warships in the coastal states in the EEZ of the coastal states, and the regulation of the foreign military activities in the region by the coastal states is mainly discussed in this paper. The second is to analyze the legal basis of American military activities in EEZ in China, including that EEZ is international waters, that military activities are freedom of navigation and other international legal purposes, that surveying activities are not marine scientific research and that the United States is not a signatory to the Convention. (III) to screen out the relevant provisions of the Convention and to assess them in the context of the Guide to Navigation and overflight in the exclusive Economic Zone (hereinafter referred to as the Guide), drafted by expert Group 21, These include "peaceful uses of the sea", "prohibition of force or threat of force", "due regard", "abuse of rights" and "residual rights rule". Fourth, enumerate the relevant practices of some developed and developing countries, including the maritime identification system of Australia, the relevant laws and regulations of Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia and other countries, In order to find the coastal state to regulate its EEZ military activities on the basis of reality. Fifthly, some suggestions are put forward to regulate foreign peacetime military activities in EEZ, including suggestions on perfecting domestic legislation and participating in international maritime affairs, as well as some measures to deal with the military activities of EEZ in time. The innovation of this paper is that, taking the Convention as the main line, and on the basis of extensive reference to the Charter of the United Nations and the Guide, and combining a series of fundamental principles of international law, This paper fully refutes the legal basis of American military activities in EEZ of our country, systematically explains the international law basis of the regulation of foreign military activities in China's EEZ by coastal states, and puts forward many suggestions for regulating foreign military activities in China's EEZ.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D993.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李元俊;;在他國(guó)專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)進(jìn)行軍事測(cè)量的法律分析[J];東方法學(xué);2010年06期

2 宿濤;;試論《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》的和平規(guī)定對(duì)專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)軍事活動(dòng)的限制和影響——美國(guó)軍事測(cè)量船在中國(guó)專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)活動(dòng)引發(fā)的法律思考[J];廈門大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2003年02期

3 王澤林;;論專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)的外國(guó)軍事活動(dòng)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年03期

4 羅保華;;論平時(shí)海上軍事行動(dòng)中《聯(lián)合國(guó)海洋法公約》的運(yùn)用[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年03期

5 鄭雷;;論中國(guó)對(duì)專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)他國(guó)軍事活動(dòng)的法律立場(chǎng)——以“無(wú)暇號(hào)”事件為視角[J];法學(xué)家;2011年01期

6 金永明;;專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)軍事活動(dòng)問(wèn)題與國(guó)家實(shí)踐[J];法學(xué);2008年03期

7 丁成耀;從國(guó)際法角度看美國(guó)測(cè)量船闖入中國(guó)專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)事件[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

8 呂建華;論我國(guó)海洋權(quán)益的現(xiàn)狀與保護(hù)[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2003年06期

9 邵津;專屬經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)內(nèi)和大陸架上的海洋科研制度[J];法學(xué)研究;1995年02期

10 于l，

本文編號(hào)：1546447