本文關鍵詞： 貿易自由化 環(huán)境保護 協(xié)調 區(qū)域性組織 中國—東盟自由貿易區(qū)　出處：《西南政法大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：自由貿易與環(huán)境保護既有促進又存在沖突，，國際社會為了協(xié)調二者的關系進行了不懈的努力：WTO將環(huán)境問題和可持續(xù)發(fā)展納入其主要工作之一，并主要利用爭端解決機制來協(xié)調二者的沖突，但WTO貿易優(yōu)先的價值取向限制了其協(xié)調的步伐；歐盟和北美自由貿易區(qū)在貿易與環(huán)境的協(xié)調上發(fā)展迅速，二者均已形成了協(xié)調的法律機制并取得了良好的協(xié)調效果。 新興的中國—東盟自由貿易區(qū)在享受經貿利益的同時也遭遇了許多環(huán)境問題，加強區(qū)域內環(huán)境合作并構建貿易與環(huán)境協(xié)調的法律機制有利于促進自貿區(qū)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。本文綜合運用案例分析、比較分析等方法對相關問題進行了系統(tǒng)的研究，分為以下五個部分： 第一章從貿易與環(huán)境的相互促進和沖突入手，通過考察WTO對貿易與環(huán)境的協(xié)調和WTO與區(qū)域協(xié)調的關系，揭示出區(qū)域協(xié)調所具有的優(yōu)勢，最后以區(qū)域協(xié)調的最新發(fā)展來表現(xiàn)了這一優(yōu)勢。 第二章選取了區(qū)域協(xié)調中比較典型的歐盟和北美自由貿易區(qū)進行介紹，從貿易與環(huán)境協(xié)調的歷史發(fā)展入手，總結了它們各自的協(xié)調原則，并通過比較分析揭示出了這些原則在適用上的差別所在。 第三章介紹了歐盟通過征收碳稅、統(tǒng)一產品標準、簽訂自愿環(huán)境協(xié)議等措施和北美自由貿易區(qū)通過賦予多邊環(huán)境協(xié)議（MEAs）優(yōu)先適用地位、規(guī)定環(huán)境標準的等效承認等措施來協(xié)調貿易與環(huán)境的關系，并通過比較分析指出了這些規(guī)則的異同及優(yōu)劣之處。 第四章闡述了歐盟強制性的司法爭端解決模式和北美自由貿易區(qū)“協(xié)商+仲裁”的準司法爭端解決模式，并通過對爭端解決的程序及效果進行分析的揭示出一個適合的爭端解決機制對一個區(qū)域性組織的重要意義所在。 第五章詳細闡述了中國—東盟自由貿易區(qū)貿易與環(huán)境協(xié)調法律機制的構建。本章從自由貿易區(qū)貿易與環(huán)境協(xié)調的現(xiàn)狀及最新進展入手，通過分析協(xié)調法律機制構建的可行性及不利條件，揭示出自貿區(qū)具備構建協(xié)調法律機制的條件，并就協(xié)調法律機制構建的內容進行了詳細闡述。
[Abstract]:Free trade and environmental protection have both promotion and conflict. In order to coordinate the relationship between them, the international community has made unremitting efforts to integrate environmental issues and sustainable development into one of its main work. And mainly use the dispute settlement mechanism to coordinate the conflict between the two, but the value orientation of WTO trade priority limits its coordination step; The European Union and the North American Free Trade area have developed rapidly in the coordination of trade and environment, both of which have formed a coordinated legal mechanism and achieved a good coordination effect. The emerging China-ASEAN Free Trade area has encountered many environmental problems while enjoying the economic and trade benefits. Strengthening the regional environmental cooperation and constructing the legal mechanism of trade and environment coordination is beneficial to promote the sustainable development of the free trade area. The comparative analysis and other methods have carried on the systematic research to the related question, which is divided into the following five parts: The first chapter starts with the mutual promotion and conflict between trade and environment, and reveals the advantages of regional coordination by examining the coordination of trade and environment by WTO and the relationship between WTO and regional coordination. Finally, this advantage is demonstrated by the latest development of regional coordination. The second chapter introduces the typical European Union and North American Free Trade area in regional coordination, and summarizes their respective coordination principles from the historical development of trade and environment coordination. And through comparative analysis to reveal the differences in the application of these principles. The third chapter introduces the European Union through the collection of carbon taxes, unified product standards, signed voluntary environmental agreements and other measures and the North American Free Trade area through the granting of multilateral environmental agreements (Meas) priority status. The equivalent recognition of environmental standards is stipulated to coordinate the relationship between trade and environment, and the similarities and disadvantages of these rules are pointed out through comparative analysis. Chapter 4th expounds the compulsory judicial dispute settlement model of EU and the quasi-judicial dispute settlement model of "negotiated arbitration" in NAFTA. By analyzing the procedure and effect of dispute settlement, it reveals the importance of a suitable dispute settlement mechanism to a regional organization. Chapter 5th elaborates the construction of the legal mechanism of trade and environment coordination in China-ASEAN Free Trade area. This chapter starts with the current situation and the latest progress of the trade and environment coordination of the Free Trade area. By analyzing the feasibility and unfavorable conditions of the construction of the coordinated legal mechanism, this paper reveals that the trade zone has the conditions for constructing the coordinated legal mechanism, and expounds in detail the contents of the construction of the coordinated legal mechanism.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.9

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 賀小勇;論WTO體制下資源保障措施的法律問題——以中歐焦炭貿易爭端為分析視角[J];比較法研究;2004年05期

2 黃錫生,黃福輝;論WTO環(huán)境保護例外的適用[J];重慶大學學報(社會科學版);2003年01期

3 張鐵軍;;中國與東亞共同體建構[J];東北亞論壇;2006年02期

4 王傳麗;;歐洲法院的司法獨立性對歐洲一體化進程的貢獻[J];當代法學;2008年02期

5 陳志;;構建大湄公河次區(qū)域爭端解決機制的思考——以區(qū)域貿易爭端解決機制模式為鑒[J];東南亞縱橫;2008年09期

6 孫志煜;;區(qū)域經貿爭端解決的制度與實踐——以中國—東盟自由貿易區(qū)為例[J];法學評論;2011年01期

7 蔡守秋;王歡歡;;歐盟環(huán)境法的發(fā)展歷程與趨勢[J];福州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年04期

8 張冕;;淺析環(huán)境合作機制中的司法保障[J];經濟研究導刊;2011年19期

9 黃穎;;歐盟貿易環(huán)境政策對中國-東盟自由貿易區(qū)之啟示[J];昆明理工大學學報(社會科學版);2008年02期

10 宮輝;;“低碳風暴”下的航空運輸業(yè)[J];空運商務;2009年23期

本文編號：1493281