本文關(guān)鍵詞： WTO爭端解決機制 申訴 應(yīng)訴 策略　出處：《華東理工大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自2001年我國加入世貿(mào)組織至今已逾首個十年。在這十年中,中國的對外貿(mào)易飛速發(fā)展,與他國的貿(mào)易摩擦和糾紛也愈來愈多。入世后,中國開始運用WTO爭端解決機制解決與他國之間的爭端,逐漸積累爭端解決的實戰(zhàn)經(jīng)驗。在前五年的過渡期內(nèi),我國在WTO爭端解決機制下的訴訟環(huán)境相對平淡。我國主要以第三方身份參與爭端解決。申訴和應(yīng)訴的案例都較少。過渡期后,在全球金融危機的背景下,我國參與的爭端解決逐年增加。從整體來講,由于入世時間不長,與其他成員國相比,一方面,我國的申訴活動還相對較少,申訴效果也不甚理想。另一方面,以美國、歐盟等發(fā)達國家為首的經(jīng)濟體頻繁針對我國的各項對外貿(mào)易政策、法規(guī)等方面提出質(zhì)疑和挑戰(zhàn)。應(yīng)訴的案件顯著增加。但是,在爭端解決過程中,訴訟結(jié)果往往不盡如人意。本文從中國參與的爭端解決實際案例出發(fā),通過深入剖析案情,找出我國勝敗的原因和經(jīng)驗教訓(xùn),從而對我國提出一些建議。便于在將來的訴訟中達到比較理想的效果。
[Abstract]:Since 2001, China has joined the WTO for more than ten years. In this decade, China's foreign trade has developed rapidly, and trade frictions and disputes with other countries have become more and more. China began to use the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to resolve disputes with other countries, gradually accumulated the actual experience of dispute settlement. During the first five years of the transition period. The litigation environment of our country under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is relatively flat. Our country mainly participates in the dispute settlement as a third party. There are few cases of complaint and response. After the transition period, under the background of the global financial crisis. China's participation in dispute settlement is increasing year by year. On the whole, due to the short time of WTO accession, compared with other member countries, on the one hand, the appeal activities of our country are relatively less, and the appeal effect is not very good on the other hand. The economies led by developed countries such as the United States and the European Union frequently challenge and challenge China's foreign trade policies and regulations. The number of cases responding to the case has increased significantly. However, in the process of dispute settlement. Litigation results are often unsatisfactory. This article from the actual case of dispute settlement in China, through in-depth analysis of the case, to find out the reasons and lessons of China's victory and defeat. Some suggestions are put forward for our country, which is convenient to achieve the ideal effect in the future litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D996.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 申琳;簡析WTO《保障措施協(xié)議》救濟措施的缺陷[J];安陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年03期

2 陳喜峰,虞汪日;論WTO案例中的司法經(jīng)濟原則[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年04期

3 都亳;我國對WTO爭端解決機制的應(yīng)對策略[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2001年03期

4 楊榮珍;從WTO案例看如何理解“國內(nèi)稅的國民待遇”[J];稅務(wù)研究;2003年11期

5 唐青陽;WTO規(guī)則的法解釋學(xué)初探[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年05期

6 趙維田;WTO案例研究:1998年海龜案[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2001年02期

7 郭薇,翁杰;從權(quán)力導(dǎo)向型向規(guī)則導(dǎo)向型的嬗變——試析GATT/WTO爭端解決機制的演進和整合[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版);2005年08期

8 田青;對WTO爭端解決機制的評價及其啟示[J];浙江工程學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年04期

9 陳志超;WTO《反傾銷協(xié)議》新問題的思考──歐共體床單案的啟示[J];中國對外貿(mào)易;2001年12期

，

本文編號：1465102