本文關(guān)鍵詞： WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制 申訴 應(yīng)訴 策略　出處：《華東理工大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自2001年我國(guó)加入世貿(mào)組織至今已逾首個(gè)十年。在這十年中,中國(guó)的對(duì)外貿(mào)易飛速發(fā)展,與他國(guó)的貿(mào)易摩擦和糾紛也愈來(lái)愈多。入世后,中國(guó)開(kāi)始運(yùn)用WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制解決與他國(guó)之間的爭(zhēng)端,逐漸積累爭(zhēng)端解決的實(shí)戰(zhàn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)。在前五年的過(guò)渡期內(nèi),我國(guó)在WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制下的訴訟環(huán)境相對(duì)平淡。我國(guó)主要以第三方身份參與爭(zhēng)端解決。申訴和應(yīng)訴的案例都較少。過(guò)渡期后,在全球金融危機(jī)的背景下,我國(guó)參與的爭(zhēng)端解決逐年增加。從整體來(lái)講,由于入世時(shí)間不長(zhǎng),與其他成員國(guó)相比,一方面,我國(guó)的申訴活動(dòng)還相對(duì)較少,申訴效果也不甚理想。另一方面,以美國(guó)、歐盟等發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家為首的經(jīng)濟(jì)體頻繁針對(duì)我國(guó)的各項(xiàng)對(duì)外貿(mào)易政策、法規(guī)等方面提出質(zhì)疑和挑戰(zhàn)。應(yīng)訴的案件顯著增加。但是,在爭(zhēng)端解決過(guò)程中,訴訟結(jié)果往往不盡如人意。本文從中國(guó)參與的爭(zhēng)端解決實(shí)際案例出發(fā),通過(guò)深入剖析案情,找出我國(guó)勝敗的原因和經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn),從而對(duì)我國(guó)提出一些建議。便于在將來(lái)的訴訟中達(dá)到比較理想的效果。
[Abstract]:Since 2001, China has joined the WTO for more than ten years. In this decade, China's foreign trade has developed rapidly, and trade frictions and disputes with other countries have become more and more. China began to use the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to resolve disputes with other countries, gradually accumulated the actual experience of dispute settlement. During the first five years of the transition period. The litigation environment of our country under the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is relatively flat. Our country mainly participates in the dispute settlement as a third party. There are few cases of complaint and response. After the transition period, under the background of the global financial crisis. China's participation in dispute settlement is increasing year by year. On the whole, due to the short time of WTO accession, compared with other member countries, on the one hand, the appeal activities of our country are relatively less, and the appeal effect is not very good on the other hand. The economies led by developed countries such as the United States and the European Union frequently challenge and challenge China's foreign trade policies and regulations. The number of cases responding to the case has increased significantly. However, in the process of dispute settlement. Litigation results are often unsatisfactory. This article from the actual case of dispute settlement in China, through in-depth analysis of the case, to find out the reasons and lessons of China's victory and defeat. Some suggestions are put forward for our country, which is convenient to achieve the ideal effect in the future litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 申琳;簡(jiǎn)析WTO《保障措施協(xié)議》救濟(jì)措施的缺陷[J];安陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

2 陳喜峰,虞汪日;論WTO案例中的司法經(jīng)濟(jì)原則[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

3 都亳;我國(guó)對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的應(yīng)對(duì)策略[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

4 楊榮珍;從WTO案例看如何理解“國(guó)內(nèi)稅的國(guó)民待遇”[J];稅務(wù)研究;2003年11期

5 唐青陽(yáng);WTO規(guī)則的法解釋學(xué)初探[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年05期

6 趙維田;WTO案例研究:1998年海龜案[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2001年02期

7 郭薇,翁杰;從權(quán)力導(dǎo)向型向規(guī)則導(dǎo)向型的嬗變——試析GATT/WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的演進(jìn)和整合[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2005年08期

8 田青;對(duì)WTO爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制的評(píng)價(jià)及其啟示[J];浙江工程學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

9 陳志超;WTO《反傾銷協(xié)議》新問(wèn)題的思考──歐共體床單案的啟示[J];中國(guó)對(duì)外貿(mào)易;2001年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：1465102