本文選題：李莊案 + 誠(chéng)信　； 參考：《西北師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：律師執(zhí)業(yè)環(huán)境的好壞反映著一個(gè)國(guó)家的法治進(jìn)程，對(duì)法治進(jìn)程的進(jìn)退有著舉足輕重的影響。1997年，我國(guó)新《律師法》的頒布雖然使我國(guó)律師的執(zhí)業(yè)環(huán)境有所改善賦予了律師許多前所未有的權(quán)利，也確定了律師的合法地位，為深受古代訟師不良影響的現(xiàn)代律師正了名；但在司法實(shí)踐中，，律師的處境依然很困難，很難充分發(fā)揮其特有的功能。2009年，隨著重慶“打黑”運(yùn)動(dòng)轟轟烈烈的開展，李莊案成為了眾矢之的，引發(fā)了一直以來為大家所關(guān)注的關(guān)于律師執(zhí)業(yè)困境存在著許多阻礙律師發(fā)揮其重要作用的因素大討論。雖然李莊案并不是我國(guó)第一起維護(hù)律師權(quán)利的案件，但它卻全面的反映了我國(guó)律師在司法實(shí)踐中的執(zhí)業(yè)困境。它反映出了我國(guó)律師在執(zhí)業(yè)過程中遭受的種種不公的待遇，得不到公眾的信任，控辯雙方權(quán)利嚴(yán)重失衡，辯護(hù)變成了“白辯”，僅有的幾項(xiàng)可憐的權(quán)利也動(dòng)不動(dòng)就會(huì)被無緣無故的剝奪，還深受《刑法》306條的威脅，自己和犯罪嫌疑人就是一墻之隔，律師的種種尷尬的處境值得進(jìn)行研究。 本文運(yùn)用實(shí)證分析法、綜合分析法和文獻(xiàn)分析法對(duì)我國(guó)律師目前尷尬的執(zhí)業(yè)處境進(jìn)行了全面的考察，結(jié)合了《刑法》、《刑事訴訟法》和新《律師法》的相關(guān)法律條文，分析了導(dǎo)致我國(guó)律師執(zhí)業(yè)困境的各種原因，分析現(xiàn)階段我國(guó)的立法缺陷和法治環(huán)境的缺陷，并借鑒了國(guó)外專家的一些觀點(diǎn)，提出了自己的一些建議以期能對(duì)改善我國(guó)律師執(zhí)業(yè)的環(huán)境的司法實(shí)踐帶來一些啟發(fā)。 本文分為三個(gè)部分：第一部分是李莊案的案情回顧以及案件所反映出來的一些問題；第二部分是對(duì)李莊案所反應(yīng)出來的一些列問題產(chǎn)生的危害及其產(chǎn)生的原因進(jìn)行分析；最后一部分是筆者就上述問題所提出的一點(diǎn)自己的建議。
[Abstract]:The practice environment of lawyers reflects the process of the rule of law in a country, and has an important influence on the progress of the rule of law. Although the promulgation of the new lawyer Law in China has improved the practice environment of lawyers in our country, it has endowed lawyers with many unprecedented rights, and also confirmed the legal status of lawyers, which has become the name of the modern lawyers who have been adversely affected by the ancient lawyers. But in the judicial practice, the lawyer's situation is still very difficult, it is very difficult to give full play to its unique function. In 2009, with the "fight against the black" movement in Chongqing, the Li Zhuang case became the target of the public. It has caused a lot of discussion about the lawyer's difficult position in practice, which hinders the lawyer to play its important role. Although the Li Zhuang case is not the first one to protect the lawyer's rights, it reflects the practice dilemma of the lawyer in our country. It reflects the unfair treatment experienced by lawyers in our country in the course of practicing, which is not trusted by the public. The rights of both sides of the prosecution and defence are seriously out of balance, and the defense has become "white debate". Only a few poor rights can easily be deprived of for no reason, but also by the "Criminal Law" 306 threats, themselves and the suspect is separated from the wall, the lawyer's various embarrassing situation worth studying. This paper uses the empirical analysis method, the comprehensive analysis method and the literature analysis method to carry on the comprehensive investigation to our country lawyer's awkward practice situation at present, has combined the relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Law, the Criminal procedure Law and the new lawyer Law. This paper analyzes the various reasons leading to the dilemma of lawyer practice in our country, analyzes the defects of legislation and legal environment in our country at the present stage, and draws lessons from the views of foreign experts. Some suggestions are put forward in order to bring some inspiration to the judicial practice of improving the practice environment of lawyers in our country. This article is divided into three parts: the first part is the case of Li Zhuang case review and some problems reflected in the case; The last part is the author's own suggestions on the above-mentioned issues.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱秋;入世對(duì)我國(guó)律師業(yè)制度建設(shè)的要求及對(duì)策[J];長(zhǎng)春大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

2 鄭春乃;;我國(guó)律師行業(yè)管理探析[J];中國(guó)司法;2006年01期

3 閆朝秀,馬達(dá);控辯關(guān)系失衡的成因及對(duì)策[J];達(dá)縣師范高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

4 楊曉培;;論律師的法律地位和保障[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年08期

5 王冠軍,張偉;中日偵查階段律師辯護(hù)制度比較研究[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

6 法任飛;法官與律師關(guān)系規(guī)范化芻議[J];河北法學(xué);2005年01期

7 李巧芬;偵查行為的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];湖南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

8 湯火箭;中國(guó)律師的地位:現(xiàn)狀、反思與前瞻[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)研究;2002年01期

9 郭雙焦;我國(guó)律師業(yè)現(xiàn)狀及其發(fā)展[J];湖南稅務(wù)高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

10 何進(jìn)平;;淺論我國(guó)的律師刑事訴訟調(diào)查取證權(quán)[J];天府新論;2006年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 樊崇義（中國(guó)政法大學(xué)教授）;[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2001年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 郭雨泉;從李莊案探析刑事審前程序中的律師辯護(hù)制度[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1887237