發(fā)布時間：2018-10-15 20:03

【摘要】： 隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的不斷發(fā)展,現(xiàn)實中遇到高科技的糾紛或者依靠高科技的手段解決問題的狀況逐漸增多,比如說,環(huán)境污染、醫(yī)療事故、交通事故等由鑒定人出現(xiàn)在訴訟活動中的情況也時有發(fā)生。司法鑒定制度是司法制度的重要組成部分,鑒定人制度是司法鑒定制度的核心,是改革的重要環(huán)節(jié)之一。司法公正和法治理念的不斷追求和推廣,使得我國的鑒定活動面臨著進一步的改革與完善,事實上這也為開辟我國司法鑒定制度改革廣闊的新局面邁出了一大步。每一個國家的訴訟中鑒定活動都是一個非常重要的程序,雖然學(xué)者們對我國現(xiàn)行的鑒定體制的爭論已經(jīng)存在很長時間,但是在司法實踐中鑒定人的重要意義是顯而易見的。在審判中,作為科學(xué)含量較高又比較公正的鑒定結(jié)論的正確運用除了需要鑒定技術(shù)、鑒定客體、鑒定體制、鑒定設(shè)備等一些要件外,還需要鑒定人制度自身的公正性、科學(xué)性。筆者在廣泛收集國內(nèi)外有關(guān)鑒定人制度資料的基礎(chǔ)上用比較的方法分析了兩大法系國家鑒定制度的特點、利弊及發(fā)展的共同趨勢,用實證的方法分析了我國鑒定人制度的立法及運作特點,對我國鑒定人制度存在的主要問題提出一些建議,提出了完善我國鑒定人制度的具體措施,希望能夠為我國鑒定人制度的改革提供一些理論依據(jù)和制度依據(jù),從而為扭正我國鑒定活動的混亂局面和實現(xiàn)司法的權(quán)威性和公正性出一份力。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of science and technology, the actual situation of meeting high-tech disputes or relying on high-tech means to solve problems is gradually increasing. For example, environmental pollution, medical malpractice, Traffic accidents and so on by the expert appear in litigation activities also occur from time to time. The system of judicial identification is an important part of the judicial system, and the system of authenticator is the core of the system of judicial identification and one of the important links of the reform. The constant pursuit and popularization of the concept of judicial justice and the rule of law make the appraisal activities in our country face further reform and perfection. In fact, this has also taken a big step forward in opening up a new situation of the broad reform of the judicial expertise system in our country. The appraisal activity in every country is a very important procedure. Although scholars have been arguing about the current appraisal system of our country for a long time, the significance of the appraiser is obvious in the judicial practice. In the trial, the correct application of the appraisal conclusion, which has a higher scientific content and more justice, requires not only the identification technology, the object, the system and the equipment, but also the justice and scientific nature of the expert system itself. Based on the extensive collection of relevant experts' system data at home and abroad, the author analyzes the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of the appraisal system in the two major legal systems and the common trend of its development by means of comparative methods. This paper analyzes the legislative and operational characteristics of the system of experts in China by using the empirical method, puts forward some suggestions on the main problems existing in the system of experts in our country, and puts forward some concrete measures to perfect the system of experts in our country. It is hoped that it can provide some theoretical and institutional basis for the reform of the appraiser system in our country, thus contributing to the correction of the chaotic situation of our country's appraisal activities and the realization of the authority and impartiality of the judiciary.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D918.9

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈健;比較與借鑒:鑒定人制度研究[J];比較法研究;2004年02期

2 徐繼軍,謝文哲;英美法系專家證人制度弊端評析[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

3 方臻;論我國鑒定人制度現(xiàn)狀與改革[J];重慶郵電學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2003年05期

4 齊樹潔;洪秀娟;;英國專家證人制度改革的啟示與借鑒[J];中國司法;2006年05期

5 郭華;;論司法鑒定統(tǒng)一管理的困境癥結(jié)及破解路向——以全國人大常委會《關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問題的決定》為中心[J];中國司法;2007年03期

6 季美君;;國外專家證人、鑒定人的資格及選任[J];中國司法;2007年06期

7 何家弘;;外國法庭科學(xué)鑒定制度初探[J];法學(xué)家;1995年05期

8 吳倩;張旭勇;;英國專家證人制度研究[J];法制與社會;2008年13期

9 李學(xué)軍,陳霞;鑒定結(jié)論的證據(jù)地位及其質(zhì)證、認證[J];公安大學(xué)學(xué)報;2002年04期

10 武帥;論我國鑒定人制度的完善[J];河北公安警察職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王清科;論我國司法鑒定程序的調(diào)整與完善[D];西南政法大學(xué);2002年

2 孫艷玲;論我國司法鑒定制度的完善[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：2273691