發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-28 16:27

  本文選題：反恐 + 羈押模式��； 參考：《中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版)》2014年04期

【摘要】：羈押是偵查機(jī)關(guān)采取的對嫌疑人人身權(quán)利約束最嚴(yán)重的手段,同時(shí)由于其具有的人身控制性也成為各國面對嚴(yán)重犯罪采用率較高的強(qiáng)制措施之一�？植乐髁x犯罪在嚴(yán)重性、急迫性、危害性等方面與普通犯罪不可同日而語。各國為了有效反恐紛紛創(chuàng)設(shè)和改良羈押模式,羈押措施的程序控制成為亟需研究和解決的課題。美國從"法律真空"到有限審查、英國的無限羈押和控制令制度是反恐背景下羈押制度改革的典型。兩種模式在法律基礎(chǔ)、程序的剛性程度、對待基本人權(quán)的態(tài)度等方面體現(xiàn)出一定的差異性,同時(shí)在普遍強(qiáng)調(diào)公民身份、推崇行政權(quán)力等方面表現(xiàn)出一致性。我國未來的反恐羈押制度必須汲取兩國經(jīng)驗(yàn),堅(jiān)持人權(quán)保障的底線標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:Custody is the most serious means to restrain the personal rights of suspects, and it has become one of the compulsory measures in the face of serious crimes. The crime of terrorism can not be compared with ordinary crime in terms of seriousness, urgency and harmfulness. In order to effectively counter-terrorism, many countries have created and improved the detention mode, and the procedural control of detention measures has become a subject that needs to be studied and solved. From "legal vacuum" to "limited review" in the United States, the unlimited detention and control order system in Britain is a typical reform of detention system in the context of anti-terrorism. The two models show some differences in legal basis, degree of rigidity of procedure, attitude towards basic human rights and so on. At the same time, the two models show consistency in the aspects of emphasizing citizenship, advocating administrative power and so on. China's future anti-terrorism detention system must draw on the experience of the two countries, adhere to the bottom line standards of human rights protection.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué);
【基金】：重慶市社科規(guī)劃培育項(xiàng)目“恐怖主義犯罪立體化對策研究”(2013PYFX13) 重慶高校創(chuàng)新團(tuán)隊(duì)建設(shè)計(jì)劃資助項(xiàng)目(KJTD201301)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D918
，

本文編號：1947404