本文選題：經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪 + 經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪　； 參考：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：“白領(lǐng)犯罪”的概念最早是由美國學(xué)者薩瑟蘭教授提出的,主要是針對社會(huì)上層有一定地位的高智商、高學(xué)歷人群所從事的在其職業(yè)活動(dòng)中以非法牟利為目的的非暴力犯罪行為。在白領(lǐng)犯罪研究過程中,國內(nèi)外學(xué)者們從不同的角度出發(fā)對白領(lǐng)犯罪進(jìn)行了各種具體的分類。其中,我國學(xué)者根據(jù)我國具體國情以及現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)范調(diào)整范圍將白領(lǐng)犯罪具體分為以下幾類：1、貪污賄賂型。2、瀆職型。3、經(jīng)濟(jì)型。4、妨害型。5、侵權(quán)型。 經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪是我國學(xué)者根據(jù)我國白領(lǐng)犯罪的實(shí)際狀況并結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)行刑法典的結(jié)構(gòu)布局特點(diǎn)所提出的一個(gè)概念,主要的研究對象是指我國刑法典第三章破壞社會(huì)主義市場經(jīng)濟(jì)秩序類犯罪。具體包括：妨害對公司、企業(yè)的管理秩序類犯罪、破壞金融管理秩序類犯罪、金融詐騙類犯罪、危害稅收征管類犯罪以及擾亂市場秩序類犯罪等。在國外,通常根據(jù)其法律條文的設(shè)置,經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪可以表現(xiàn)為進(jìn)行貿(mào)易限制、財(cái)政金融欺詐操作、回扣等行為。因此,經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪存在著隱蔽性強(qiáng)、不易察覺、非暴力性、危害嚴(yán)重等特征。 經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪不單只存在于中國,在世界其他國家亦有發(fā)生發(fā)生。尤其是在歐美等市場經(jīng)濟(jì)較為發(fā)達(dá)的國家中,防控經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪已有近百年的歷史。其中,隨著實(shí)踐變化調(diào)整立法、建立事前防控體系、完善經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪人矯正體系等相關(guān)手段都在這些國家防控經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪的斗爭中取得了明顯的效果。值得我們研究借鑒。 隨著改革開放以來,我國社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅速發(fā)展,經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪在我國逐漸出現(xiàn)并開始蔓延。尤其是最近幾年,在社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期間,一些經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪人利用自身經(jīng)濟(jì)、權(quán)力等方面的優(yōu)勢以及相關(guān)法規(guī)制度不健全的漏洞,屢屢犯下各種罪行,例如近年來出現(xiàn)的黃光裕案、杭蕭鋼構(gòu)內(nèi)幕交易案等,給國家和社會(huì)造成了極其嚴(yán)重的損失,使得國家的經(jīng)濟(jì)信譽(yù)受到了嚴(yán)重的損害。 分析上述這些案例,不難發(fā)現(xiàn)中國的經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪主要體現(xiàn)出隱蔽性強(qiáng)、權(quán)錢交易泛濫、犯罪手段及工具新特性顯著等幾個(gè)主要特點(diǎn)；再加之大眾防范意識普遍淡薄,防控體系不夠健全等因素,使得近年來的經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪在我國的防控形勢日益嚴(yán)峻。 因此,解決中國的經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪問題,需要將國外一些學(xué)者的研究成果,如薩瑟蘭教授的差異交往理論、默頓的社會(huì)異常理論以及馬斯洛的需求理論等,有效的應(yīng)用到我國防治經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪的實(shí)踐中去。通過分析社會(huì)原因和個(gè)體原因,從拓展立法思路、更新刑罰手段、完善犯罪人矯正體系、建立有效的法外預(yù)防體系等方面出發(fā),齊抓共管,這樣才能從根本上有效的抑制中國經(jīng)濟(jì)型白領(lǐng)犯罪的發(fā)生。
[Abstract]:The concept of "white-collar crime" was first put forward by Professor Sutherland, an American scholar, mainly aimed at the high intelligence quotient of a certain position in the upper echelons of society. Non-violent crime committed by high-educated people in their professional activities for the purpose of illegal profit-making. In the process of white-collar crime research, scholars at home and abroad have carried out various concrete classification of white-collar crime from different angles. Among them, according to the specific conditions of our country and the scope of adjustment of existing legal norms, Chinese scholars divide white-collar crimes into the following categories: 1: 1, corruption and bribery. 2, dereliction of duty, economic. 4, nuisance. 5, tort. The economic white-collar crime is a concept put forward by Chinese scholars according to the actual situation of white-collar crime in our country and the structural layout characteristics of our country's current criminal code. The main research object is that the third chapter of the Criminal Code of China damages the order of socialist market economy. It includes: the crime of harming the management order of the company and the enterprise, the crime of destroying the order of financial management, the crime of financial fraud, the crime of harming the tax collection and administration, and the crime of disturbing the order of the market, etc. In foreign countries, usually according to its legal provisions, economic white-collar crime can be manifested in trade restrictions, financial fraud, kickbacks and other acts. Therefore, the economic white-collar crime has the characteristics of strong concealment, not easy to detect, non-violent, serious harm and so on. Economic white-collar crime not only exists in China, but also in other countries of the world. Especially in the developed countries such as Europe and America, the prevention and control of economic white-collar crime has a history of nearly 100 years. Among them, with the change of practice, adjustment of legislation, establishment of pre-control system, improvement of economic white-collar crime correction system and other relevant means in these countries to prevent and control the white-collar crime in the struggle has achieved obvious results. It is worth our study and reference. With the rapid development of China's social economy since the reform and opening up, the economic white-collar crime has gradually appeared and spread in our country. In particular, in recent years, during the period of social transformation, some economic white-collar criminals have repeatedly committed various crimes by taking advantage of their own advantages in economy, power, and other aspects, as well as loopholes in the relevant laws and regulations. For example, the case of Huang Guangyu and the case of Hangxiao Steel Insider Trading in recent years have caused extremely serious losses to the country and the society, and caused serious damage to the country's economic reputation. By analyzing these cases, it is not difficult to find that the economic white-collar crime in China mainly embodies several main characteristics, such as strong concealment, overflowing trading of power and money, remarkable new characteristics of criminal means and tools, and the general weak consciousness of public defense. The prevention and control system is not perfect, which makes the situation of economic white collar crime in our country more and more serious in recent years. Therefore, in order to solve the problem of economic white-collar crime in China, it is necessary to take the research results of some foreign scholars, such as Professor Sutherland's theory of differential communication, Merton's theory of social abnormality and Maslow's theory of demand, etc. Effective application to our country to prevent and cure the practice of economic white-collar crime. Through the analysis of social and individual reasons, from the aspects of expanding the legislative thinking, renewing the means of punishment, perfecting the criminal correction system, establishing an effective system of extra-legal prevention, and so on, Only in this way can the Chinese economy-type white-collar crime be restrained fundamentally and effectively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D917

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李強(qiáng);現(xiàn)代化對中國社會(huì)分層結(jié)構(gòu)之影響[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2000年02期

2 葉繼紅;薩瑟蘭與白領(lǐng)犯罪[J];福建公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào).社會(huì)公共安全研究;2000年06期

3 王芝祥;莫志成;;制定經(jīng)濟(jì)刑法芻議[J];法學(xué)雜志;1987年04期

4 龍宗智;論我國轉(zhuǎn)型期規(guī)制經(jīng)濟(jì)的刑事政策[J];法學(xué);2005年01期

5 黃錦就,梅建明,黃慧霞;論白領(lǐng)犯罪[J];中國人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2004年02期

6 史昭樂,黃勇;社會(huì)分層結(jié)構(gòu)變化與城市貧困問題[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);1999年06期

7 王振生;;保安處分在我國的法律命運(yùn)[J];河北法學(xué);2007年08期

8 聶慶;白領(lǐng)犯罪的若干問題研究[J];河南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

9 劉祖云;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型與社會(huì)分層——20世紀(jì)末中國社會(huì)的階層分化[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年04期

10 陳宗勝,武潔;收入分配差別與二元經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;1990年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 唐永軍;中國白領(lǐng)犯罪研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

2 萬國海;經(jīng)濟(jì)犯罪的刑事政策研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 都媛媛;論白領(lǐng)犯罪概念的界定[D];中國政法大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1946097