本文選題：勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng) + 缺陷��； 參考：《暨南大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度是我國特有的一種法律制度。在勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)的五十多年歷史中,它已成功地教育和挽救了一大批違法和輕微犯罪人員,為維護(hù)社會(huì)穩(wěn)定,預(yù)防和減少違法犯罪,發(fā)揮了不可忽視的作用。但是,由于制度本身存在的嚴(yán)重缺陷,以及在實(shí)際運(yùn)作過程中存在的種種問題,勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度已與建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國家的目標(biāo)相背離�！吨腥A人民共和國行政處罰法》、《立法法》出臺、2004年我國憲法修正案中莊嚴(yán)寫入“國家尊重和保障人權(quán)”條款,使其正當(dāng)性和合法性遭到質(zhì)疑,客觀要求必須對它進(jìn)行全面的改革或者立法。 筆者結(jié)合公安工作中遇到的勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)問題,從實(shí)際出發(fā),從理性的角度來思考勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度。首先,在回顧勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度1955年以來兩個(gè)重要發(fā)展階段的基礎(chǔ)上,指出勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)在不同時(shí)期里發(fā)揮著不同社會(huì)效用的特點(diǎn),是一項(xiàng)具有濃厚的政治色彩和行政命令色彩的強(qiáng)制性行政處罰措施。其次,剖析現(xiàn)有勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度在法理上的沖突,即勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)違反了“處罰法定”原則、“罪刑相適應(yīng)”原則和“法律面前一律平等”原則,其執(zhí)行程序缺乏正當(dāng)性基礎(chǔ),缺乏完善的法律監(jiān)督機(jī)制和法律救濟(jì)機(jī)制,指出了這些問題對現(xiàn)行勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度造成的困惑。第三,為解決以上問題,提出要對勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)進(jìn)行重構(gòu)的重要性。只有對勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度進(jìn)行重構(gòu),才能使勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度有利于尊重和保障人權(quán),有利于限制公安機(jī)關(guān)的司法裁決權(quán),有利于將勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度納入司法程序。最后,按照現(xiàn)代法治“依法治國”的理念,提出了勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的立法構(gòu)想,明確勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)的法律性質(zhì)、適用對象、執(zhí)行期限、審批程序和執(zhí)行方式等內(nèi)容,并建議進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng)勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的改革與完善,使之能早日成為行之有效的法律制度。
[Abstract]:The system of reeducation through labor is a special legal system in our country. In the more than 50 years' history of reeducation through labor, it has successfully educated and saved a large number of illegal and minor criminals and played an important role in maintaining social stability and preventing and reducing illegal crimes. However, due to the serious shortcomings of the system itself and the problems in its practical operation, The system of re-education through labour has deviated from the goal of building a socialist country ruled by law. The Administrative punishment Law of the people's Republic of China, the Legislative Law, and the provisions of "the State respects and guarantees Human Rights" are enshrined in the 2004 amendment to the Constitution of our country. The legitimacy and legitimacy of the system are called into question, and it must be reformed or legislated comprehensively. Combining with the problems of reeducation through labor in public security work, the author thinks about the system of reeducation through labor from the point of view of reality and rationality. First of all, on the basis of reviewing the two important stages of development of the re-education through labour system since 1955, it is pointed out that reeducation through labour plays a different social role in different periods. Is a strong political color and administrative order color mandatory administrative punishment measures. Secondly, it analyzes the conflict in the legal principle of the existing system of re-education through labor, that is, it violates the principle of "punishment law", the principle of "the adaptation of crime and punishment" and the principle of "equality before the law", and its execution procedure lacks the basis of legitimacy. The lack of perfect legal supervision mechanism and legal remedy mechanism points out the puzzlement caused by these problems to the current reeducation through labor system. Third, in order to solve the above problems, put forward the importance of reconstructing reeducation through labor. Only by reconstructing the system of re-education through labor can we make the system of reeducation through labour be beneficial to respect and safeguard human rights, to limit the judicial power of public security organs, and to bring the system of re-education through labor into the judicial procedure. Finally, according to the concept of "ruling the country by law" of modern rule of law, this paper puts forward the legislative conception of the system of re-education through labor, and clarifies the legal nature, the applicable object, the time limit of execution, the procedure of examination and approval and the mode of execution, etc. It is suggested that the reform and perfection of the reeducation through labour system should be further strengthened so that it can become an effective legal system as soon as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：暨南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D926.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 司法部勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度改革與完善研究課題組;改革與完善中國勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度(上)[J];中國司法;2004年03期

2 王金泉;;試論勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)改革中的價(jià)值重建[J];中國司法;2007年03期

3 陳興良;勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度與中國法制建設(shè)問題研討(一)——?jiǎng)趧?dòng)教養(yǎng)之權(quán)力歸屬分析[J];法學(xué);2001年05期

4 陳瑞華;警察權(quán)的司法控制——以勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)為范例的分析[J];法學(xué);2001年06期

5 程書兵;;勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)聆詢制度探討[J];廣東行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期

6 丁軍;芻論公民的法律至上觀[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2005年09期

，

本文編號：1946513