法治唯理主義建構(gòu)及其批判
發(fā)布時間：2019-07-04 06:22
【摘要】：唯理主義是傳統(tǒng)理性主義極端化的變體,古希臘羅馬時代就有唯理主義的傳統(tǒng),而近代,隨著科學技術(shù)的發(fā)展,社會的進步和變革的加劇,需要迅速產(chǎn)生規(guī)則來適應(yīng)和維持社會的秩序,這為唯理主義法治建構(gòu)理論提供了適合的時代背景�，F(xiàn)代法治國家建構(gòu)本身作為一個理性的活動必定需要理性的參與,理性對于制度的構(gòu)建確實發(fā)揮著重大的作用。但重大并非唯一,理性并非萬能。如果迷信理性,認為理性能夠掌控、計劃人類社會的一切事務(wù),必將陷入唯理主義的泥淖,以為法律就是“以立法統(tǒng)合整個法律”,加上具有組織化政府的偏向推進,社會秩序?qū)⒊尸F(xiàn)出一元的法治秩序,而去除了習慣、風俗等社會內(nèi)部產(chǎn)生的秩序形式,這與真實的秩序形態(tài)不符。這也將帶來侵蝕自由,過度精英化,脫離真實生活的惡果。尊重理性,尊重人類生活就需要現(xiàn)代法治國家謹防唯理主義“元意識形態(tài)”支配下的法治建構(gòu),防范夸大知識和理性的作用,防范唯理主義的法治秩序觀,這對當下中國的法治建構(gòu)尤具意義。
[Abstract]:Rationalism is a variant of the extremes of traditional rationalism. In ancient Greece and Rome, there was the tradition of rationalism. In modern times, with the development of science and technology and the aggravation of social progress and change, it is necessary to produce rules quickly to adapt to and maintain the social order, which provides a suitable background for the construction theory of rationalism under the rule of law. The construction of modern country ruled by law itself as a rational activity must need rational participation, rationality does play an important role in the construction of the system. But great is not the only, reason is not omnipotent. If we believe that reason can control and plan all the affairs of human society, we will certainly fall into the quagmire of rationalism, thinking that the law is "integrating the whole law with legislation". In addition, with the bias of an organized government, the social order will present a unitary order of the rule of law, and the form of order produced within the society, such as habits and customs, will be removed. This is inconsistent with the real form of order. This will also lead to the erosion of freedom, excessive elitism, away from the consequences of real life. Respecting reason and human life requires modern countries ruled by law to guard against the construction of the rule of law under the domination of rationalism "meta-ideology", to prevent exaggerating the role of knowledge and reason, and to prevent the view of order of rule of law of rationalism, which is of particular significance to the construction of the rule of law in China at present.
【學位授予單位】：南京大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90
本文編號：2509700
[Abstract]:Rationalism is a variant of the extremes of traditional rationalism. In ancient Greece and Rome, there was the tradition of rationalism. In modern times, with the development of science and technology and the aggravation of social progress and change, it is necessary to produce rules quickly to adapt to and maintain the social order, which provides a suitable background for the construction theory of rationalism under the rule of law. The construction of modern country ruled by law itself as a rational activity must need rational participation, rationality does play an important role in the construction of the system. But great is not the only, reason is not omnipotent. If we believe that reason can control and plan all the affairs of human society, we will certainly fall into the quagmire of rationalism, thinking that the law is "integrating the whole law with legislation". In addition, with the bias of an organized government, the social order will present a unitary order of the rule of law, and the form of order produced within the society, such as habits and customs, will be removed. This is inconsistent with the real form of order. This will also lead to the erosion of freedom, excessive elitism, away from the consequences of real life. Respecting reason and human life requires modern countries ruled by law to guard against the construction of the rule of law under the domination of rationalism "meta-ideology", to prevent exaggerating the role of knowledge and reason, and to prevent the view of order of rule of law of rationalism, which is of particular significance to the construction of the rule of law in China at present.
【學位授予單位】：南京大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D90
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 鄧正來;;社會秩序規(guī)則二元觀——哈耶克法律理論的研究[J];北大法律評論;1999年02期
2 賈中海;蘇麗華;;理性與社會發(fā)展秩序[J];中共長春市委黨校學報;2006年03期
3 鄧正來;哈耶克批判的前提性準備 著譯者言[J];讀書;2003年04期
4 劉建軍;當代中國政治思潮的興起與變遷[J];華東師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年03期
5 單中惠;劉亮;;社會精英與統(tǒng)治秩序：西方雄辯家教育的闡釋與訴求[J];華東師范大學學報(教育科學版);2008年02期
6 周安平;;許霆案的民意:按照大數(shù)法則的分析[J];中外法學;2009年01期
7 蘇力;《無需法律的秩序》[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2004年01期
8 陳坤;;論價值領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的智識可能性[J];學術(shù)月刊;2007年09期
9 喬瑞華;;笛卡爾“上帝存在”證明與其理性主義哲學的關(guān)系[J];理論學習;2008年01期
10 高鴻鈞;;法律移植:隱喻、范式與全球化時代的新趨向[J];中國社會科學;2007年04期
，本文編號：2509700
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2509700.html
