【摘要】：聽(tīng)證制度作為行政程序法基本制度的核心,為各國(guó)所廣泛采用。美國(guó)依其憲法中正當(dāng)程序條款發(fā)展了較為完善的聽(tīng)證程序,要求行政機(jī)關(guān)在作出對(duì)他人不利決定前必須聽(tīng)取對(duì)方的意見(jiàn),每一個(gè)人都有為自己辯護(hù)的權(quán)利。 1996年3月第八屆全國(guó)人大四次會(huì)議通過(guò)的《中華人民共和國(guó)行政處罰法》,充分注意到行政程序制度的價(jià)值,在我國(guó)法律制度中第一次確立了行政聽(tīng)證制度。隨后通過(guò)的幾部法律對(duì)行政聽(tīng)證制度又有了較大的發(fā)展。然而,作為一項(xiàng)全新的法律制度,我國(guó)的行政聽(tīng)證制度起步較晚,目前還存在許多缺陷與不足,這些問(wèn)題的存在,嚴(yán)重地妨礙了行政聽(tīng)證制度正常功能的發(fā)揮,亟待解決。 本文重點(diǎn)探討的是美國(guó)行政聽(tīng)證制度,對(duì)美國(guó)行政聽(tīng)證制度的重要問(wèn)題展開(kāi)深入研究和討論,目的是盡可能準(zhǔn)確、全面地介紹這一制度的情況,探討其產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展的歷史背景和理論原因。全文共分為導(dǎo)論、正文三章和結(jié)語(yǔ)。本文第一章重點(diǎn)闡釋了美國(guó)行政聽(tīng)證制度的理論淵源；第二章重點(diǎn)研究美國(guó)行政聽(tīng)證制度的種類及其具體的程序,以及美國(guó)的行政聽(tīng)證制度如何在一定的社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)條件下不斷發(fā)展變化,最終又是如何在實(shí)踐中逐步完善自己的；第三章在前兩章的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)照我國(guó)的行政聽(tīng)證制度提出設(shè)想和建議。希望能通過(guò)對(duì)美國(guó)行政聽(tīng)證制度的研究進(jìn)一步完善我國(guó)的行政聽(tīng)證制度。
[Abstract]:Hearing system, as the core of the basic system of administrative procedure law, is widely used by many countries. The United States has developed a more perfect hearing procedure in accordance with the due process provisions of its Constitution, requiring the administrative organs to listen to each other before making adverse decisions against others, and everyone has the right to defend himself. The Administrative punishment Law of the people's Republic of China, adopted by the fourth session of the eighth National people's Congress in March 1996, fully paid attention to the value of the administrative procedure system and established the administrative hearing system for the first time in the legal system of our country. Several laws passed subsequently have made great progress in the administrative hearing system. However, as a new legal system, the administrative hearing system in our country started relatively late, and there are still many defects and deficiencies at present. The existence of these problems seriously hinders the normal function of the administrative hearing system and needs to be solved urgently. This paper focuses on the American administrative hearing system, and deeply studies and discusses the important issues of the American administrative hearing system, in order to introduce the system as accurately and comprehensively as possible, and to explore the historical background and theoretical reasons for its emergence and development. The full text is divided into three chapters: introduction, main body and conclusion. The first chapter focuses on the theoretical origin of the administrative hearing system in the United States; the second chapter focuses on the types and specific procedures of the administrative hearing system in the United States, as well as how the administrative hearing system in the United States continues to develop and change under certain social and economic conditions, and finally how to gradually improve itself in practice; the third chapter puts forward ideas and suggestions against the administrative hearing system in our country on the basis of the first two chapters. It is hoped that the administrative hearing system of our country can be further improved through the study of the administrative hearing system in the United States.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD912.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王慧;行政處罰的非正式聽(tīng)證程序[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2498412