【摘要】：唐代是中國封建社會發(fā)展的鼎盛時期，唐代的刑事法律制度也達到了非常完善的程度。唐代的刑事法律制度的制定緊密結(jié)合由其政權(quán)性質(zhì)所決定的立法原則，，形成了包括犯罪與刑罰以及訴訟制度等非常完善的刑事法律制度體系，法律制度的篇章結(jié)構(gòu)井然有序，法律形式相得益彰，概念精練明確，用語確切簡要，邏輯嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)縝密，疏議得當(dāng)精深，有效地調(diào)整了當(dāng)時各種紛繁復(fù)雜的社會關(guān)系。刑法適用的原則、量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與以往相比較都更為周密，可操作性強。在刑事司法實踐中，充分體現(xiàn)了刑事立法中的等級特權(quán)思想和法律的倫理道德特征，同時，唐代的刑事立法和刑事司法也體現(xiàn)了慎刑的思想和原則，用刑持平，既保證了刑事法制維護封建統(tǒng)治的需要，同時刑事法制中對老少廢疾減免刑罰的規(guī)定也緩解了社會矛盾。唐代的刑事法制博大精深，對后世封建社會和周邊國家都產(chǎn)生了深遠影響，而且，唐代刑事法制中的慎刑思想和親親相隱制度以及保辜制度對當(dāng)代中國的刑事法制的發(fā)展與完善也具有重要的借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:Tang Dynasty is the heyday of the development of feudal society in China, and the criminal legal system of Tang Dynasty has also reached a very perfect degree. The formulation of the criminal legal system in Tang Dynasty closely combined with the legislative principles determined by the nature of its political power, formed a very perfect criminal legal system, including crime, penalty and litigation system, the text structure of the legal system was orderly, the legal form was complementary, the concept was concise, the language was precise and concise, the logic was rigorous and meticulous, and the discussion was thorough and meticulous. Effectively adjusted a variety of complex social relations at that time. Compared with the past, the applicable principles and sentencing standards of criminal law are more careful and operable. In the practice of criminal justice, it fully embodies the thought of hierarchical privileges in criminal legislation and the ethical and moral characteristics of the law. At the same time, the criminal legislation and criminal justice of Tang Dynasty also embody the thought and principle of cautious punishment. The use of punishment is the same, which not only ensures the need for the criminal legal system to maintain feudal rule, but also alleviates the social contradictions in the criminal legal system. The criminal legal system of Tang Dynasty was extensive and profound, which had a profound influence on the feudal society of later generations and the surrounding countries. Moreover, the thought of cautious punishment and the system of kinship and privacy in the criminal legal system of Tang Dynasty, as well as the system of protecting the Koo, also had important reference significance for the development and perfection of the criminal legal system in contemporary China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D929;D924

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣敏露;;保辜制度引進現(xiàn)行刑法的可行性探析——以界定故意殺人和故意傷害談起[J];法制與社會;2010年11期

2 齊昊;;以“矜老”為源談《刑法修正案(八)》[J];法制與社會;2011年18期

3 李中和;;從曲元衡杖殺柏公成之母案看唐代保辜制度[J];貴州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年03期

4 李東春;;封建倫理法的代表之作《唐律疏議》[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年09期

5 徐慧娟;;《唐律疏議》中的孝倫理思想[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2011年06期

6 葉劍鋒;;論等級特權(quán)制及其對封建專制主義的衛(wèi)護[J];湖北成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年03期

7 封志曄;;保辜制度：和諧視角的重新解讀[J];江漢論壇;2008年01期

8 王立民;;略論中國古代的法律倫理——以《唐律疏議》為中心[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2012年03期

9 王占通;;論違禮是唐律的刑事責(zé)任依據(jù)——兼論中華法系的特點[J];社會科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;1987年04期

10 王華;;唐律中自首制度研究[J];大眾商務(wù);2010年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊茗;試論唐代刑事訴訟審判制度[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 郭海霞;刑事法治視野中的親屬拒證權(quán)[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2005年

3 李忠建;《唐律疏議》法律倫理思想研究[D];重慶師范大學(xué);2009年

4 孟憲政;唐代慎刑論[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：2497829