韓國補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼法律制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-05-20 16:45
【摘要】：人口數(shù)量和資源等客觀因素決定了韓國的內(nèi)需不足，因此韓國制定了以出口為導(dǎo)向的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展模式。早在20世紀(jì)60年代中期，韓國就確立了“出口第一”和“貿(mào)易立國”的基本國策。韓國的對外貿(mào)易依存度1非常高，在2010年甚至達(dá)到了87.9%。2在中韓進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易方面，韓國是中國第三大貿(mào)易伙伴國、第三大出口對象國和第二大進(jìn)口來源國，3中國則是韓國第一大貿(mào)易伙伴。隨著國際市場競爭日益激烈，中國越來越多地遭到韓國的反傾銷調(diào)查以及反傾銷措施。雖然韓國還沒有對中國發(fā)起反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查的實(shí)踐，但在國際反補(bǔ)貼措施方興未艾，“雙反”措施層出不窮之際，對韓國的補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼制度進(jìn)行研究，可為中國應(yīng)對韓國將來的反補(bǔ)貼調(diào)查提供參考和借鑒。 本文是國內(nèi)第一篇全面介紹韓國補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼制度的論文。我國對韓國反傾銷制度的研究始于上個世紀(jì)，4但截至今日，，還沒有關(guān)于韓國補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼制度方面的研究。從國際層面來看，反傾銷案件的數(shù)量十倍于反補(bǔ)貼，研究反傾銷制度更具現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。特別是韓國尚無實(shí)施反補(bǔ)貼措施的實(shí)踐,而只是規(guī)定準(zhǔn)用反傾銷措施程序，這也是有關(guān)韓國反補(bǔ)貼制度的研究較少的一個原因。但是自21世紀(jì)初以來，加拿大、美國等國家開始對中國采取反補(bǔ)貼措施甚至“雙反”措施。在這種情況下，對中國主要貿(mào)易對象國的補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼制度研究成為必須。 論文在第一章分析了韓國補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼制度的立法體系及發(fā)展史，全面介紹了韓國反補(bǔ)貼機(jī)構(gòu)的職能與歷史沿革。論文第二章以韓國《關(guān)稅法》、《關(guān)稅法施行令》、《關(guān)稅法施行規(guī)則》等法律法規(guī)以及貿(mào)易委員會發(fā)布的法律文件為依據(jù)，并結(jié)合WTO的《SCM協(xié)定》，采用比較分析與法律條文分析的方法，介紹韓國的反補(bǔ)貼法律實(shí)體制度。第三章研究韓國的補(bǔ)貼與反補(bǔ)貼程序制度。第四章說明了韓國反補(bǔ)貼制度的實(shí)踐情況，分析了韓國對反補(bǔ)貼制度的政策立場，對其將來的情況做出了合理的預(yù)測。論文參考了大量法律法規(guī)、文獻(xiàn)、期刊、學(xué)位論文、案例及網(wǎng)站資料。
[Abstract]:Objective factors such as population and resources determine the shortage of domestic demand in South Korea, so South Korea has formulated an export-oriented economic development model. As early as the mid-1960 s, South Korea established the basic national policy of "export first" and "trade nation". South Korea's dependence on foreign trade is very high, reaching 87.9% in 2010. In terms of import and export trade between China and South Korea, South Korea is China's third largest trading partner, the third largest export target country and the second largest source of imports. China, on the other hand, is South Korea's largest trading partner. With the increasingly fierce competition in the international market, China is more and more subjected to anti-dumping investigations and anti-dumping measures by South Korea. Although South Korea has not yet launched a countervailing investigation into China, at a time when international countervailing measures are in the ascendant and "double countervailing" measures emerge in endlessly, the subsidy and countervailing system in South Korea has been studied. It can provide reference and reference for China to deal with South Korea's future countervailing investigation. This paper is the first comprehensive introduction of Korean subsidy and countervailing system in China. The study of Korean anti-dumping system in China began in the last century, but up to now, there is no research on Korean subsidy and countervailing system. From the international point of view, the number of anti-dumping cases is ten times that of countervailing, so it is of more practical significance to study the anti-dumping system. In particular, South Korea has not yet implemented countervailing measures, but only stipulates the procedure of allowing anti-dumping measures, which is also one of the reasons for the lack of research on South Korea's countervailing system. But since the beginning of the 21st century, Canada, the United States and other countries have begun to take countervailing measures or even "double countervailing" measures against China. In this case, it is necessary to study the subsidy and countervailing system of China's major trade target countries. In the first chapter, the paper analyzes the legislative system and development history of Korean subsidy and countervailing system, and comprehensively introduces the functions and historical evolution of Korean countervailing agency. The second chapter of the paper is based on the Korean Customs Law, the Customs Law Enforcement order, the Customs Law Enforcement rules and other laws and regulations, as well as the legal documents issued by the Trade Commission, and combined with the SCM Agreement of the WTO. This paper introduces the countervailing legal entity system in Korea by means of comparative analysis and legal provisions analysis. The third chapter studies the subsidy and countervailing procedure system in Korea. The fourth chapter explains the practice of Korean countervailing system, analyzes South Korea's policy position on countervailing system, and makes a reasonable prediction of its future situation. The paper refers to a large number of laws and regulations, literature, journals, degree papers, cases and website materials.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D931.26;DD912.29
本文編號：2481791
[Abstract]:Objective factors such as population and resources determine the shortage of domestic demand in South Korea, so South Korea has formulated an export-oriented economic development model. As early as the mid-1960 s, South Korea established the basic national policy of "export first" and "trade nation". South Korea's dependence on foreign trade is very high, reaching 87.9% in 2010. In terms of import and export trade between China and South Korea, South Korea is China's third largest trading partner, the third largest export target country and the second largest source of imports. China, on the other hand, is South Korea's largest trading partner. With the increasingly fierce competition in the international market, China is more and more subjected to anti-dumping investigations and anti-dumping measures by South Korea. Although South Korea has not yet launched a countervailing investigation into China, at a time when international countervailing measures are in the ascendant and "double countervailing" measures emerge in endlessly, the subsidy and countervailing system in South Korea has been studied. It can provide reference and reference for China to deal with South Korea's future countervailing investigation. This paper is the first comprehensive introduction of Korean subsidy and countervailing system in China. The study of Korean anti-dumping system in China began in the last century, but up to now, there is no research on Korean subsidy and countervailing system. From the international point of view, the number of anti-dumping cases is ten times that of countervailing, so it is of more practical significance to study the anti-dumping system. In particular, South Korea has not yet implemented countervailing measures, but only stipulates the procedure of allowing anti-dumping measures, which is also one of the reasons for the lack of research on South Korea's countervailing system. But since the beginning of the 21st century, Canada, the United States and other countries have begun to take countervailing measures or even "double countervailing" measures against China. In this case, it is necessary to study the subsidy and countervailing system of China's major trade target countries. In the first chapter, the paper analyzes the legislative system and development history of Korean subsidy and countervailing system, and comprehensively introduces the functions and historical evolution of Korean countervailing agency. The second chapter of the paper is based on the Korean Customs Law, the Customs Law Enforcement order, the Customs Law Enforcement rules and other laws and regulations, as well as the legal documents issued by the Trade Commission, and combined with the SCM Agreement of the WTO. This paper introduces the countervailing legal entity system in Korea by means of comparative analysis and legal provisions analysis. The third chapter studies the subsidy and countervailing procedure system in Korea. The fourth chapter explains the practice of Korean countervailing system, analyzes South Korea's policy position on countervailing system, and makes a reasonable prediction of its future situation. The paper refers to a large number of laws and regulations, literature, journals, degree papers, cases and website materials.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國社會科學(xué)院研究生院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D931.26;DD912.29
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條
1 戴仲川;國際反傾銷法中的行政復(fù)審機(jī)制探析[J];華僑大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1999年04期
2 任虎;馬光;;中韓反傾銷案中“期終復(fù)審”制度的比較研究[J];華東理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年01期
3 劉歡;日本、韓國反傾銷法律制度的啟示與借鑒[J];中國石油和化工;2001年11期
4 欒信杰;論韓國反傾銷法[J];外國經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;1997年06期
5 李哲煥;韓國反傾銷法的不足與完善[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報;2004年05期
6 ;韓國反傾銷法律制度[J];中國經(jīng)貿(mào)導(dǎo)刊;2000年19期
本文編號：2481791
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2481791.html
