中韓公司破產(chǎn)重整制度的比較研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-20 10:37
【摘要】：破產(chǎn)重整作為一種特殊的企業(yè)救濟(jì)程序,是指對可能或已經(jīng)發(fā)生破產(chǎn)原因但又有挽救希望的法人型企業(yè),通過對各方利害關(guān)系人的利益協(xié)調(diào),強(qiáng)制進(jìn)行營業(yè)重組與債務(wù)清理,以使企業(yè)避免破產(chǎn)、獲得更生的法律制度。與破產(chǎn)和解、清算制度相比,重整在挽救債務(wù)人方面具有突出的效用,因而被公認(rèn)為是預(yù)防破產(chǎn)最為有力的制度。 在現(xiàn)代立法上,美國和日本的破產(chǎn)重整制度最具典型性。日本的公司更生法是乘襲了美國的舊破產(chǎn)法,而韓國的破產(chǎn)重整制度又是借鑒日本公司更生法制定的。韓國的破產(chǎn)重整制度立法已有40多年的歷史,而且經(jīng)過多次修訂,已經(jīng)形成了較為細(xì)致嚴(yán)密的規(guī)則體系。我國法律意義上的破產(chǎn)重整制度,取代舊法之整頓制度,在2006年制定的《企業(yè)破產(chǎn)法》上才得以確立。體現(xiàn)了現(xiàn)代破產(chǎn)法的社會(huì)價(jià)值取向,對于構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)具有重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。但與韓國的破產(chǎn)重整制度相比較,由于立法的歷史較短以及缺乏司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)作支撐,該制度的完善還有相當(dāng)長的路要走。本文為探求中國重整制度的改進(jìn)方案,通過與韓國破產(chǎn)重整制度的比較分析,提出了完善中國破產(chǎn)重整制度的一些建議。 本文首先論述了破產(chǎn)重整制度的基礎(chǔ)問題。包括破產(chǎn)重整制度的概念、特征,中國與韓國破產(chǎn)重整制度的歷史沿革。并將重整制度與破產(chǎn)和解制度和破產(chǎn)清算制度進(jìn)行相比較,先從法理上對破產(chǎn)重整制度有個(gè)總括的認(rèn)識(shí)。 其次分別介紹了中國《破產(chǎn)法》與韓國《統(tǒng)合倒產(chǎn)法》中有關(guān)破產(chǎn)重整制度的規(guī)定。從重整制度的適用范圍、重整申請、重整計(jì)劃的制定、表決與批準(zhǔn)、執(zhí)行和重整程序的終止與終結(jié)等方面,分別進(jìn)行展開。 之后對我國的破產(chǎn)重整制度整體架構(gòu)深入考察的前提下,結(jié)合韓國的破產(chǎn)重整實(shí)務(wù)的最新發(fā)展著重研究了重整制度的進(jìn)入機(jī)制,比較分析了中韓兩國破產(chǎn)重整程序的制度,得出了我國重整制度在適用范圍上受限制、重整原因過于寬泛、重整申請人的規(guī)定以及重整管轄法院的條件單一、重整計(jì)劃的起草人和重整計(jì)劃的表決和批準(zhǔn)制度的規(guī)定不夠完善等不足之處。針對我國破產(chǎn)重整制度發(fā)展途徑中產(chǎn)生的根本問題指出了韓國破產(chǎn)重整制度中擴(kuò)大重整申請主體、法院專屬管轄制度中的一些借鑒方法,并建議破產(chǎn)法上導(dǎo)入清算型計(jì)劃草案與事前計(jì)劃草案值得借鑒的改進(jìn)方案,以便完善我國破產(chǎn)重整制度。
[Abstract]:Bankruptcy reorganization, as a special enterprise relief procedure, refers to the compulsory business restructuring and debt cleaning of legal person enterprises that may or have occurred bankruptcy reasons but have hope of saving through the coordination of the interests of interested parties. In order to avoid bankruptcy and obtain a more legal system. Compared with bankruptcy settlement and liquidation system, reorganization has a prominent effect in saving debtors, so it is recognized as the most powerful system to prevent bankruptcy. In modern legislation, the bankruptcy reorganization system in the United States and Japan is the most typical. Japan's corporate life law has multiplied the old bankruptcy law of the United States, while South Korea's bankruptcy restructuring system has been formulated by using the Japanese company more law for reference. The bankruptcy reorganization system legislation in South Korea has a history of more than 40 years, and after many amendments, it has formed a more detailed and strict rule system. The bankruptcy reorganization system in the legal sense of our country, replacing the rectification system of the old law, was established in the Enterprise bankruptcy Law formulated in 2006. It embodies the social value orientation of modern bankruptcy law and has important practical significance for building a harmonious society. However, compared with the bankruptcy reorganization system in South Korea, due to the short history of legislation and the lack of judicial practical experience as support, the improvement of the system still has a long way to go. In order to explore the improvement scheme of China's reorganization system, this paper puts forward some suggestions for perfecting China's bankruptcy reorganization system through comparative analysis with South Korea's bankruptcy reorganization system. This paper first discusses the basic problems of bankruptcy reorganization system. Including the concept and characteristics of bankruptcy reorganization system, the historical evolution of bankruptcy reorganization system in China and South Korea. By comparing the reorganization system with the bankruptcy settlement system and the bankruptcy liquidation system, there is a general understanding of the bankruptcy reorganization system from the legal point of view. Secondly, it introduces the provisions of bankruptcy reorganization system between China bankruptcy Law and Korea Law. It is carried out from the aspects of the scope of application of the reorganization system, the application for reorganization, the formulation of the reorganization plan, the voting and approval, the termination and termination of the execution and the reorganization procedure, and so on. After that, on the premise of in-depth investigation of the overall structure of the bankruptcy reorganization system in our country, combined with the latest development of the bankruptcy reorganization practice in South Korea, this paper focuses on the entry mechanism of the reorganization system, and compares and analyzes the systems of the bankruptcy reorganization procedure between China and South Korea. It is concluded that the reorganization system in our country is limited in the scope of application, the reasons for the reorganization are too broad, the provisions of the reorganization applicant and the conditions of the reorganization jurisdiction court are single. The drafters of the reorganization plan and the inadequate provisions of the voting and approval system of the reorganization plan. In view of the fundamental problems arising from the development of bankruptcy reorganization system in China, this paper points out some reference methods in expanding the subject of reorganization application and the exclusive jurisdiction system of the court in the bankruptcy reorganization system in Korea. It is suggested that the draft liquidation plan and the draft prior plan should be introduced into the bankruptcy law in order to perfect the bankruptcy reorganization system of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D931.26;D922.291.92
本文編號(hào)：2481592
[Abstract]:Bankruptcy reorganization, as a special enterprise relief procedure, refers to the compulsory business restructuring and debt cleaning of legal person enterprises that may or have occurred bankruptcy reasons but have hope of saving through the coordination of the interests of interested parties. In order to avoid bankruptcy and obtain a more legal system. Compared with bankruptcy settlement and liquidation system, reorganization has a prominent effect in saving debtors, so it is recognized as the most powerful system to prevent bankruptcy. In modern legislation, the bankruptcy reorganization system in the United States and Japan is the most typical. Japan's corporate life law has multiplied the old bankruptcy law of the United States, while South Korea's bankruptcy restructuring system has been formulated by using the Japanese company more law for reference. The bankruptcy reorganization system legislation in South Korea has a history of more than 40 years, and after many amendments, it has formed a more detailed and strict rule system. The bankruptcy reorganization system in the legal sense of our country, replacing the rectification system of the old law, was established in the Enterprise bankruptcy Law formulated in 2006. It embodies the social value orientation of modern bankruptcy law and has important practical significance for building a harmonious society. However, compared with the bankruptcy reorganization system in South Korea, due to the short history of legislation and the lack of judicial practical experience as support, the improvement of the system still has a long way to go. In order to explore the improvement scheme of China's reorganization system, this paper puts forward some suggestions for perfecting China's bankruptcy reorganization system through comparative analysis with South Korea's bankruptcy reorganization system. This paper first discusses the basic problems of bankruptcy reorganization system. Including the concept and characteristics of bankruptcy reorganization system, the historical evolution of bankruptcy reorganization system in China and South Korea. By comparing the reorganization system with the bankruptcy settlement system and the bankruptcy liquidation system, there is a general understanding of the bankruptcy reorganization system from the legal point of view. Secondly, it introduces the provisions of bankruptcy reorganization system between China bankruptcy Law and Korea Law. It is carried out from the aspects of the scope of application of the reorganization system, the application for reorganization, the formulation of the reorganization plan, the voting and approval, the termination and termination of the execution and the reorganization procedure, and so on. After that, on the premise of in-depth investigation of the overall structure of the bankruptcy reorganization system in our country, combined with the latest development of the bankruptcy reorganization practice in South Korea, this paper focuses on the entry mechanism of the reorganization system, and compares and analyzes the systems of the bankruptcy reorganization procedure between China and South Korea. It is concluded that the reorganization system in our country is limited in the scope of application, the reasons for the reorganization are too broad, the provisions of the reorganization applicant and the conditions of the reorganization jurisdiction court are single. The drafters of the reorganization plan and the inadequate provisions of the voting and approval system of the reorganization plan. In view of the fundamental problems arising from the development of bankruptcy reorganization system in China, this paper points out some reference methods in expanding the subject of reorganization application and the exclusive jurisdiction system of the court in the bankruptcy reorganization system in Korea. It is suggested that the draft liquidation plan and the draft prior plan should be introduced into the bankruptcy law in order to perfect the bankruptcy reorganization system of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D931.26;D922.291.92
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 朱明陽;;企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整制度探析[J];中共成都市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期
2 袁嘉;;上市公司破產(chǎn)重整中債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)的實(shí)證分析[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期
3 丁國峰;;試論我國破產(chǎn)重整計(jì)劃制度之完善[J];法治研究;2010年01期
4 吳正綿;;破產(chǎn)重整操作模式之律師實(shí)務(wù)探究[J];法治研究;2010年02期
5 王遠(yuǎn)明,羅攀;論公司重整制度的價(jià)值取向和適用范圍[J];南方金融;2002年10期
6 呂慧娟;;論破產(chǎn)重整參與主體的角色定位[J];懷化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期
7 閆華紅;王安亮;;基于破產(chǎn)重整的企業(yè)價(jià)值評估方法探析[J];會(huì)計(jì)之友(下旬刊);2010年10期
8 王欣新;;試論重整制度之立法完善[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期
9 王衛(wèi)國;論重整制度[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年01期
10 涂晟;;上市公司破產(chǎn)重整“兩步走”問題探析[J];中共南昌市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 金星均;韓國公司重整制度立法的研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年
2 齊明;美國破產(chǎn)重整制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2009年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 潘聞怡;我國上市公司破產(chǎn)重整程序研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年
2 郭倫海;我國破產(chǎn)重整法律制度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年
3 李振;中美破產(chǎn)重整制度比較研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年
4 張宋娟;破產(chǎn)重整制度的研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2011年
5 付世利;破產(chǎn)重整制度價(jià)值目標(biāo)及其實(shí)現(xiàn)機(jī)制研究[D];河北大學(xué);2011年
6 孫心琳;中美日破產(chǎn)重整制度之比較研究[D];青島大學(xué);2006年
7 謝博;我國企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年
8 陳佳;我國企業(yè)破產(chǎn)重整程序研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年
9 薛敏;我國商業(yè)銀行破產(chǎn)重整制度研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年
10 許玉茹;上市公司重整中的股東權(quán)益研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年
，本文編號(hào)：2481592
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2481592.html
