【摘要】：韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》是目前世界上唯一一部以統(tǒng)一立法模式制定的行政調(diào)查的法規(guī)。這部法規(guī)頒布實施以來,韓國國內(nèi)重復(fù)行政調(diào)查嚴重、行政調(diào)查混亂無序的狀況得到了顯著的改善,它的實效性在韓國今天的行政調(diào)查現(xiàn)狀中得到了充分的體現(xiàn)。 鑒于我國行政調(diào)查實施混亂無序、行政調(diào)查法規(guī)嚴重缺失,行政調(diào)查學術(shù)研究止步不前的現(xiàn)狀；又考慮到在行政調(diào)查方面,韓國與我國基本情況的諸多相似之處。所以筆者選擇以韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》作為研究對象,從立法角度對其進行考察,包括它的立法背景、歷程、立法成果和施行后韓國學者們提出的完善建議等諸多內(nèi)容,筆者都將一一對它們進行介紹與探討。最后總結(jié)這些內(nèi)容對我國行政調(diào)查立法的啟示。 本文共分為五個部分,第一部分：行政調(diào)查概述,主要介紹行政調(diào)查的概念,世界各國行政調(diào)查的立法現(xiàn)狀和選擇韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》為考察對象的原因。這一章中首先介紹行政調(diào)查的概念,然后以英、美、日、韓四國對行政調(diào)查立法的現(xiàn)狀,引出目前世界關(guān)于行政調(diào)查立法的三種模式,最后闡述由于韓國與我國在各方面的諸多相似之處,所以選擇韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》為考察對象的原因。 第二部分：韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》的立法歷程,主要介紹韓國行政調(diào)查立法的背景,方案的選擇及制定與修訂。按照時間順序,介紹立法前韓國行政調(diào)查的狀況,突出立法背景的特色；然后介紹韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》立法方案比較分析與選擇,最后介紹韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》立法的經(jīng)過,突出韓國國內(nèi)對該法的重視。 第三部分：韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》的主要內(nèi)容評述,按照該法的自身結(jié)構(gòu),分總則、分則兩部分介紹它的主要內(nèi)容,并對部分條款結(jié)合韓國國內(nèi)學者們的立法討論進行分析,闡述筆者個人的觀點。 第四部分：韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》的特色與缺陷,根據(jù)前面講過的內(nèi)容及其在頒布實施后曝露出的缺陷,總結(jié)《基本法》的特色與缺陷,并結(jié)合韓國國內(nèi)的學者們?yōu)橥晟圃摲ㄋ岢龅慕ㄗh,進一步提出完善這些缺陷的辦法。 第五部分：肯定韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》對我國的借鑒意義,并著重總結(jié)韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》對我國行政調(diào)查的立法啟示。承認韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》的立法模式、理念和程序性內(nèi)容對我國行政調(diào)查立法的正面意義,并結(jié)合上一章講過的該法中的缺陷,從反面吸取教訓,實現(xiàn)正反兩面的借鑒；并結(jié)合我國的實際情況,闡述我國行政調(diào)查從韓國《行政調(diào)查基本法》中得到的立法啟示。
[Abstract]:The basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea is the only administrative investigation law formulated by unified legislation in the world at present. Since the promulgation and implementation of this law, the repeated administrative investigation in South Korea has been serious, the disorder of administrative investigation has been significantly improved, and its effectiveness has been fully reflected in the current situation of administrative investigation in South Korea. In view of the chaos and disorder in the implementation of administrative investigation in our country, the serious lack of administrative investigation laws and regulations, and the present situation of administrative investigation academic research, and considering the similarities between the basic situation of South Korea and our country in the aspect of administrative investigation, it is also considered that there are many similarities between South Korea and our country in the basic situation of administrative investigation. Therefore, the author chooses the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea as the research object, and investigates it from the legislative point of view, including its legislative background, course, legislative achievements and suggestions put forward by Korean scholars after its implementation, and so on. The author will introduce and discuss them one by one. Finally, it summarizes the enlightenment of these contents to the legislation of administrative investigation in our country. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part: an overview of administrative investigation, mainly introduces the concept of administrative investigation, the legislative status of administrative investigation in the world and the reasons for choosing the basic Law of Administrative investigation in Korea as the object of investigation. In this chapter, the concept of administrative investigation is first introduced, and then the current situation of administrative investigation legislation in Britain, the United States, Japan and South Korea leads to three modes of administrative investigation legislation in the world at present. Finally, this paper expounds the reasons why the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea is chosen as the object of investigation because of the similarities between South Korea and China in all aspects. The second part: the legislative process of the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea, mainly introduces the background of the legislation of administrative investigation in Korea, the choice, formulation and revision of the scheme. According to the time order, this paper introduces the situation of Korean administrative investigation before the legislation, and highlights the characteristics of the legislative background. Then it introduces the comparative analysis and selection of the legislative scheme of the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea, and finally introduces the legislative process of the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea, highlighting the importance attached to the Law in South Korea. The third part: comments on the main contents of the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea, according to its own structure, divided into general provisions, divided into two parts to introduce its main contents, and some provisions combined with the legislative discussion of domestic scholars in South Korea are analyzed. This paper expounds the author's personal point of view. The fourth part: the characteristics and defects of the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea, according to the contents mentioned earlier and the defects exposed after its promulgation and implementation, this paper summarizes the characteristics and defects of the basic Law. Combined with the suggestions put forward by scholars in South Korea to improve the law, the methods of perfecting these defects are further put forward. The fifth part: affirm the reference significance of the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea to our country, and focus on summing up the legislative enlightenment of the basic Law of Administrative investigation in Korea to the administrative investigation in our country. To recognize the positive significance of the legislative mode, concept and procedural content of the basic Law of Administrative investigation in South Korea to the legislation of administrative investigation in our country, and to draw lessons from the negative side and realize the positive and negative reference in the light of the defects in the law mentioned in the previous chapter. Combined with the actual situation of our country, this paper expounds the legislative enlightenment of the administrative investigation in Korea from the basic Law of Administrative investigation in Korea.
【學位授予單位】：延邊大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D931.26;DD912.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜明安;;全球化時代的“新行政法”[J];法學雜志;2009年10期

2 張娟;;行政調(diào)查基本概念初探[J];法學雜志;2009年10期

3 黃岳;;“革命性的變化”——美國最高法院對于行政調(diào)查權(quán)態(tài)度變化的觀察(20世紀40年代到80年代)[J];研究生法學;2009年03期

4 姜明安;;共和國行政法治的發(fā)展圖景[J];法學家;2009年05期

5 康貞花;;韓國行政調(diào)查基本法的特色及對中國的立法啟示[J];河北法學;2011年10期

6 宋雅芳;;論行政調(diào)查中相對人協(xié)助義務(wù)的限度[J];河南社會科學;2006年05期

7 徐寅哲,周平平;論行政調(diào)查的程序要件[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學院學報;2005年04期

8 應(yīng)松年;莊漢;;行政調(diào)查的現(xiàn)狀與未來發(fā)展方向[J];江蘇社會科學;2008年05期

9 李莉;;大陸法系行政調(diào)查中公民調(diào)查義務(wù)的規(guī)范實證分析[J];經(jīng)濟研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年14期

10 李莉;;英、美、法三國行政調(diào)查制度的比較研究[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學院學報;2010年04期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 衛(wèi)行;[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2004年

2 浙江省湖州市食品藥品監(jiān)管局 朱春妹;[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 覃蓉;行政調(diào)查法律規(guī)制研究[D];華東師范大學;2011年

2 陳燕妮;行政調(diào)查取證的證據(jù)效力問題研究[D];華東政法大學;2011年

3 徐寅哲;行政調(diào)查基礎(chǔ)理論研究[D];蘇州大學;2006年

4 李宏坤;行政調(diào)查的權(quán)力反思與理性規(guī)制[D];長春理工大學;2007年

5 張獎勵;論行政陷阱調(diào)查[D];中國政法大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2479293