城市社區(qū)中的多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-05-14 10:59
【摘要】：本文緣起于筆者親歷一個(gè)物業(yè)糾紛事件，單個(gè)事件本身有其獨(dú)特的背景與原因，但是卻折射出當(dāng)今中國社會(huì)普遍的一個(gè)現(xiàn)象。城市社區(qū)是中國轉(zhuǎn)型社會(huì)矛盾顯現(xiàn)的一個(gè)“小舞臺(tái)”，如何有效解決城市社區(qū)內(nèi)的矛盾沖突，尋求有效治理城市社區(qū)的治理模式，是構(gòu)筑和諧社會(huì)的整體的有益探索。對(duì)此，不管是理論界還是政府，都進(jìn)行了探討與實(shí)踐，城市社區(qū)中的糾紛類型多樣，呈現(xiàn)出專業(yè)化、復(fù)雜化、群體化趨向。反觀城市社區(qū)中的糾紛排解與解決機(jī)制面對(duì)龐大的現(xiàn)實(shí)需求卻顯得捉襟見肘，各種矛盾解決機(jī)制獨(dú)立分散，沒有體系性與連貫性，使社會(huì)矛盾存在一個(gè)“空白地帶”。 作為城市基本組成單位的社區(qū)中糾紛頻發(fā)，矛盾容易激化進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致重大群體性事件，危害整個(gè)城市的安全，無益于和諧社會(huì)的構(gòu)建；此類糾紛的產(chǎn)生也帶有明顯的時(shí)代印記，市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展帶來個(gè)體利益的追逐，各種利益需求相互交織，多元化力量相互對(duì)抗，演變?yōu)樯鐣?huì)轉(zhuǎn)型背景下城市社區(qū)所面臨的社區(qū)治理問題。帶著對(duì)于城市社區(qū)環(huán)境的關(guān)切以及營造和諧密切的生活環(huán)境的期望，筆者以空間為坐標(biāo)，比較傳統(tǒng)的農(nóng)村社會(huì)與當(dāng)下的城市社區(qū)，揭示出改革開放所帶來的變革性不僅僅體現(xiàn)在經(jīng)濟(jì)制度上，社會(huì)形態(tài)、居民心態(tài)都隨之發(fā)生了巨大轉(zhuǎn)變：在主體構(gòu)成多樣化，社會(huì)分化明顯的趨勢(shì)下，個(gè)體權(quán)利意識(shí)增強(qiáng)，彈性空間縮小，而傳統(tǒng)道德的規(guī)范作用下降，多元化主體之間缺乏長效的溝通平臺(tái)；然后以時(shí)間為脈絡(luò)，分析城市社區(qū)從“單位制”到“社區(qū)制”的轉(zhuǎn)變，以實(shí)踐角度揭示轉(zhuǎn)型社會(huì)背景下轉(zhuǎn)變管理模式是必然選擇，但是現(xiàn)有的管理模式卻無法有效地管理脫離“單位制”管轄的社區(qū)，居委會(huì)等基層組織職能定位模糊，功能發(fā)揮受到限制。 在分析的基礎(chǔ)上，本文通過提出以多元化合作構(gòu)筑協(xié)商溝通平臺(tái)，維護(hù)社區(qū)整體性為指導(dǎo)原則，通過培養(yǎng)“社區(qū)精神”，發(fā)揮社區(qū)內(nèi)生性力量；構(gòu)建溝通層——協(xié)調(diào)層——調(diào)節(jié)層——裁決層的分層過濾制度，促進(jìn)司法權(quán)力等正式權(quán)力在社區(qū)內(nèi)部的非正式運(yùn)作；建立社區(qū)內(nèi)公共平臺(tái)和綜合治理中心，系統(tǒng)地將具有時(shí)代新特征的社區(qū)矛盾糾紛歸入社會(huì)法律控制體系，完善社區(qū)治理。 社會(huì)穩(wěn)定是社會(huì)控制的最終目標(biāo)，如何更好地妥善解決社區(qū)矛盾糾紛，有利于彌補(bǔ)現(xiàn)有糾紛解決方式的不足，克服訴訟途徑的有限作用和現(xiàn)實(shí)困鏡，完善法律制度體系，促進(jìn)城市社區(qū)可持續(xù)性發(fā)展，促進(jìn)社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的建設(shè)，這也是本文之目的所在。
[Abstract]:This paper originates from the author's experience of a property dispute event, a single event itself has its own unique background and reasons, but reflects a common phenomenon in today's Chinese society. Urban community is a "small stage" for the contradiction of transitional society in China. How to effectively solve the contradiction and conflict in urban community and seek the governance mode of effective governance of urban community is a beneficial exploration to build a harmonious society as a whole. In this regard, both the theoretical circle and the government have carried on the discussion and the practice, the dispute type in the urban community is various, presents the specialization, the complexity, the group tendency. On the other hand, the dispute resolution and resolution mechanism in the urban community is overstretched in the face of the huge realistic demand. All kinds of contradiction resolution mechanisms are independent and scattered, and there is no system and coherence, so that there is a "blank zone" of social contradictions. As the basic unit of the city, disputes occur frequently in the community, and the contradiction is easy to intensify, which leads to major group events, endangers the safety of the whole city, and is not conducive to the construction of a harmonious society. The emergence of such disputes also has an obvious imprint of the times, the development of market economy brings the pursuit of individual interests, various interests and needs are intertwined with each other, and pluralistic forces confront each other. It has evolved into the problem of community governance faced by urban communities under the background of social transformation. With the concern for the urban community environment and the expectation of creating a harmonious and close living environment, the author takes space as the coordinate and compares the traditional rural society with the current urban community. It is revealed that the transformation brought about by reform and opening up is not only reflected in the economic system, but also in the social form and residents' state of mind. Under the trend of diversification of subject composition and obvious social differentiation, the awareness of individual rights is enhanced. The elastic space is reduced, while the normative role of traditional morality is declining, and there is a lack of a long-term communication platform among the diversified subjects. Then, taking time as the context, this paper analyzes the transformation of urban community from "unit system" to "community system", and reveals from the practical point of view that it is an inevitable choice to change the management mode under the background of transitional society. However, the existing management mode can not effectively manage the community which is out of the jurisdiction of the "unit system". The function orientation of grass-roots organizations such as neighborhood committees is vague, and the function play is limited. On the basis of analysis, this paper puts forward the guiding principle of constructing consultation and communication platform based on diversified cooperation and maintaining the integrity of the community, and giving full play to the intrinsic strength of the community by cultivating the "community spirit". To construct the hierarchical filtering system of communication layer, coordination layer, regulatory layer and adjudication layer, and to promote the informal operation of formal power such as judicial power within the community. Establish the public platform and comprehensive governance center in the community, systematically put the community contradictions and disputes with the new characteristics of the times into the social legal control system, and improve the community governance. Social stability is the ultimate goal of social control. How to better solve community contradictions and disputes is conducive to making up for the shortcomings of the existing dispute resolution methods, overcoming the limited role and practical difficulties of litigation channels, and perfecting the legal system. Promote the sustainable development of urban community and promote the construction of socialist harmonious society, which is also the purpose of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0
本文編號(hào)：2476655
[Abstract]:This paper originates from the author's experience of a property dispute event, a single event itself has its own unique background and reasons, but reflects a common phenomenon in today's Chinese society. Urban community is a "small stage" for the contradiction of transitional society in China. How to effectively solve the contradiction and conflict in urban community and seek the governance mode of effective governance of urban community is a beneficial exploration to build a harmonious society as a whole. In this regard, both the theoretical circle and the government have carried on the discussion and the practice, the dispute type in the urban community is various, presents the specialization, the complexity, the group tendency. On the other hand, the dispute resolution and resolution mechanism in the urban community is overstretched in the face of the huge realistic demand. All kinds of contradiction resolution mechanisms are independent and scattered, and there is no system and coherence, so that there is a "blank zone" of social contradictions. As the basic unit of the city, disputes occur frequently in the community, and the contradiction is easy to intensify, which leads to major group events, endangers the safety of the whole city, and is not conducive to the construction of a harmonious society. The emergence of such disputes also has an obvious imprint of the times, the development of market economy brings the pursuit of individual interests, various interests and needs are intertwined with each other, and pluralistic forces confront each other. It has evolved into the problem of community governance faced by urban communities under the background of social transformation. With the concern for the urban community environment and the expectation of creating a harmonious and close living environment, the author takes space as the coordinate and compares the traditional rural society with the current urban community. It is revealed that the transformation brought about by reform and opening up is not only reflected in the economic system, but also in the social form and residents' state of mind. Under the trend of diversification of subject composition and obvious social differentiation, the awareness of individual rights is enhanced. The elastic space is reduced, while the normative role of traditional morality is declining, and there is a lack of a long-term communication platform among the diversified subjects. Then, taking time as the context, this paper analyzes the transformation of urban community from "unit system" to "community system", and reveals from the practical point of view that it is an inevitable choice to change the management mode under the background of transitional society. However, the existing management mode can not effectively manage the community which is out of the jurisdiction of the "unit system". The function orientation of grass-roots organizations such as neighborhood committees is vague, and the function play is limited. On the basis of analysis, this paper puts forward the guiding principle of constructing consultation and communication platform based on diversified cooperation and maintaining the integrity of the community, and giving full play to the intrinsic strength of the community by cultivating the "community spirit". To construct the hierarchical filtering system of communication layer, coordination layer, regulatory layer and adjudication layer, and to promote the informal operation of formal power such as judicial power within the community. Establish the public platform and comprehensive governance center in the community, systematically put the community contradictions and disputes with the new characteristics of the times into the social legal control system, and improve the community governance. Social stability is the ultimate goal of social control. How to better solve community contradictions and disputes is conducive to making up for the shortcomings of the existing dispute resolution methods, overcoming the limited role and practical difficulties of litigation channels, and perfecting the legal system. Promote the sustainable development of urban community and promote the construction of socialist harmonious society, which is also the purpose of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李克;;完善多元糾紛解決機(jī)制——問題與思考[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期
2 梁平;;多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的制度構(gòu)建——基于公眾選擇偏好的實(shí)證考察[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2011年03期
3 肖揚(yáng);;進(jìn)一步完善多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制 推動(dòng)和支持人民調(diào)解工作不斷開創(chuàng)新局面[J];中國司法;2007年08期
4 浩春杏;;后單位時(shí)代城市社區(qū)的主要特征探討[J];大連干部學(xué)刊;2009年11期
5 徐文虎;;以人的主體性為本建立多元化糾紛解決方式的必要性[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期
6 范愉;以多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制 保證社會(huì)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];法律適用;2005年02期
7 王振清;多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制與糾紛解決資源[J];法律適用;2005年02期
8 范愉;;私力救濟(jì)考[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年06期
9 張櫻櫻,唐禮勇;信任理論的演進(jìn):從“個(gè)體行為”到“制度建構(gòu)”[J];科學(xué)·經(jīng)濟(jì)·社會(huì);2004年03期
10 范會(huì)芳;論社區(qū)研究的三種模式[J];理論月刊;2001年08期
，本文編號(hào)：2476655
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2476655.html
